1 / 18

Progress and Promise: Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools

Progress and Promise: Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools. Center for Collaborative Education January 2006. History of Pilot Schools. Pilot Schools are the result of a unique partnership between the Boston Teachers Union and the Boston Public Schools

cody
Download Presentation

Progress and Promise: Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Progress and Promise:Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools Center for Collaborative Education January 2006

  2. History of Pilot Schools • Pilot Schools are the result of a unique partnership between the Boston Teachers Union and the Boston Public Schools • They were created in 1994 to provide increased choice to Boston families and to serve as laboratories for innovation.

  3. Pilot Schools Have Autonomy • Budget • Staffing • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment • Governance and Policies • Schedule

  4. Additional Key Features of Pilot Schools • Accountable • Small • Vision-Driven • Focused on Equity

  5. Boston Pilot Schools Network • Same per pupil expenditure • Goal of being demographically representative of district students • Not selective by prior academic achievement or entrance exam

  6. 1. Pilot high schools outperform the district average on every indicator of student engagement • Higher attendance rate • Lower out-of-school suspension rate • Lower district leaver rate • Lower in-district transfer rate

  7. Student Engagement Findings

  8. 2. Pilot high schools outperform the district average on every indicator of student performance • Lower grade level retention rate • Higher MCAS proficiency rates • Higher MCAS pass rates • Higher college enrollment rate

  9. Percent

  10. 3. Pilot high school demographics are representative of district enrollment. • Race/ethnicity • Free/reduced lunch eligibility • Mainstream special education • Substantially separate special education • English proficiency

  11. 4. Pilot Schools achieve their results by using control over their resources to shape the school in three areas: • Instruction • Structure • Culture

  12. Instruction • A core curriculum for all students • A competency-based approach to graduation • Integrated curriculum (e.g., Humanities) • Multiple forms of assessment

  13. Structure • Small school size • Lower class size (18 students) • Low student-teacher loads (55 per teacher in secondary grades) • Long instructional periods • Significant amounts of collaborative planning time for faculty

  14. Culture • Unifying vision • Professional collaborative culture • Shared decision making inclusive of staff, families, students • Focus on equity through use of data • Support for students (advisories)

  15. Implications for High Schools and Districts • The Pilot Schools represent a powerful district - teachers union model of reform. • Autonomy and accountability go hand-in-hand. • School size is an important factor. • Autonomy and school size are not the solution in and of themselves, but critical ingredients of high school reform.

  16. www.cce.org

More Related