150 likes | 290 Views
Routine PSA: Evaluating the Evidence. Sheldon Greenfield, MD Health Policy Research Institute University of California, Irvine October 23, 2012. Management of Intellectual Conflict of Interest.
E N D
Routine PSA:Evaluating the Evidence Sheldon Greenfield, MDHealth Policy Research InstituteUniversity of California, IrvineOctober 23, 2012
Management of Intellectual Conflict of Interest “Academic activities that create the potential for an attachment to a specific point of view that could unduly affect an individual’s judgment about a specific recommendation” - Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust Institute of Medicine, 2011
“Conclusions: Analyses after 2 additional years of follow-up consolidated our previous finding that PSA-based screening significantly reduced mortality from prostate cancer but did not affect all-cause mortality.”
Why Doesn’t ScreeningWork Better? • Co-morbidity (life expectancy) • Lead time bias • Over diagnosis bias (no progression over time)
Clinical Policy Options • No routine PSA screening • Screen all over 50 or 55 • Biopsy only those with PSA> 10 • Active surveillance for those with high levels of comorbidity (decreased 10 year life expectancy) • Treatment only by high quality urologists
Clinical Policy Options (cont’) Screen all those with high life expectancy Leave it to the patient and the doctor to decide (USPSTF Level C)