100 likes | 107 Views
This is the agenda and schedule for the DCCP Working Group Meeting at IETF-58 in Minneapolis, including design review follow-up, open issues, and discussions on CCID-3 Thin and the User Guide.
E N D
Datagram Congestion Control (DCCP) working group Slides are available at http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/ietf58 Mailing list: http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dccp IETF-58 Minneapolis 1
DCCP Meeting Agenda • Agenda bashing, schedule discussion, etc 10 min • Design Review Followup 60 min • Open issues • Changes made • No change needed • CCID-3 Thin discussion 15 min • User Guide 15 min IETF-58 Minneapolis 2
DCCP Working Group Schedule • Sep-Nov 03 Incorporate review and implementation feedback into spec • Oct 03 Collaborate with avt wg on API • IETF-58 Prepare for WGLC • Nov 03 WGLC for spec, CCIDs • Dec 03 WGLC on User Guide IETF-58 Minneapolis 3
Revised Schedule • IETF-58 Collaborate with avt wg on API • IETF-58 Prepare for WGLC • Nov 03 Revise spec, CCIDs • Dec 03 WGLC for spec, CCIDs • Dec 03 Publish user-guide rev1 • Feb 04 Publish user-guide rev2 • Mar 04WGLC on User Guide IETF-58 Minneapolis 4
API feedback from AVT • Some discussion of issues on dccp list • Issue summary sent to mmusic • Forwarded to avt • Eddie on AVT agenda, Wed 0900 IETF-58 Minneapolis 5
CCID-3 Thin poll • Should DCCP take draft-ietf-dccp-ccid3-thin-00.txton as a new deliverable? • How hard is this? • Pretty simple • Keep thinking about how to express this task as a possible future work item • Consider making CCID3-thin an appendix to spec as an existence proof of simplicity • Why not: multiple profiles all requiring state machine changes is BAD • May be premature, consider CCID-4 future IETF-58 Minneapolis 7
Work to be done Can you send slightly above congestion control allowed rate? (up to twice allowed rate) Possibly a work item in tsvwg During slow start or after idle, are you allowed to send at more than twice the current rate? Clearly research TFRC w/variable packet sizes Expected in tsvwg, on Sally’s list IETF-58 Minneapolis 8
Moving forward, a poll • How many are following the working group (reading list, drafts…)? • Of those, how many are planning on going to Korea? IETF-58 Minneapolis 9
Adjourn. Thanks! IETF-58 Minneapolis 10