1 / 163

802.11 TGmb Editor Report – Sept 2011

802.11 TGmb Editor Report – Sept 2011. Authors:. Date: 2011-09-12. Abstract. This document summarises editorial activities on the TGmb Draft since the last meeting Status of Draft Status of comments E-Motions

colette-austin
Download Presentation

802.11 TGmb Editor Report – Sept 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 TGmb Editor Report – Sept 2011 Authors: Date: 2011-09-12 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  2. Abstract • This document summarises editorial activities on the TGmb Draft since the last meeting • Status of Draft • Status of comments • E-Motions • This document is cumulative, newer data at the front – i.e., it will be revised per meeting to show updated status. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  3. Sept 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  4. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  5. Numbering • Keeping all comments from WG and Sponsor ballots in the same spreadsheet. • The initial sponsor ballot is shown as LB 1000 • Comments from 10000 onwards • The first recirc is LB1001 • Comments from 11000 onwards • The second recirc is LB1002 • Comments from 12001 to 12863 • The third recirc is LB1003 • Comments from 13001 to 13209 and comments 13300-13306 • The fourth recirc is LB1004 • Comments from 14001 to 14257 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  6. SB4 Commenters Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  7. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 (WG0) • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. (WG1) • D3.0, 2010-03 – balloted as LB162 (WG2) • D4.0, 2010-06 – for ballot (WG3) • D5.0, 2010-08 – for ballot (WG4) • D6.0, 2010-09 – first sponsor ballot, includes MEC change (SB0) • D7.0, 2011-02 – Sponsor recirc #1 (SB1) • D8.0, 2011-03 – Sponsor Recirc #2 (SB2) • D9.0, 2011-05 – Sponsor Recirc #3 (SB3) • D10.0, 2011-08 – Sponsor Recirc #4 (SB4) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  8. Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D10.0.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D10.0 Redline*.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-10-1284-13-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-10-1455-12-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments.xls • Not yet published – no resolutions completed yet Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  9. Comment Status (2011-09-12) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  10. Editorial comment resolutions • None proposed yet Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  11. Status of 802.11s • A pre-publication version of 802.11s was received from the IEEE-SA editors in order to allow balloting of .11s in this recirculation. • IEEE Std 802.11s-2011 was approved by the IEEE-SA standards board and published the same day on 10 Sept. • There are some minor editorial tweaks made between the pre-publication version and the published version. These will be propagated into D11. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  12. Plan (as of July 2011) • We slipped about 1 week due to holidays Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  13. Plan - 2 • Current goal is November EC approval and Jan RevCom (continuous process), with publication in Jan/Feb. • Given we are unlikely to complete SB4 comment resolution during the September meeting, what impact might this have? Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  14. July 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  15. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  16. Numbering • Keeping all comments from WG and Sponsor ballots in the same spreadsheet. • The initial sponsor ballot is shown as LB 1000 • Comments from 10000 onwards • The first recirc is LB1001 • Comments from 11000 onwards • The second recirc is LB1002 • Comments from 12001 to 12863 • The third recirc is LB1003 • Commends from 13001 to 13208, plus comment 13209 and comments 13300-13306 received after the close of the ballot Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  17. SB3 Commenters Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  18. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 (WG0) • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. (WG1) • D3.0, 2010-03 – balloted as LB162 (WG2) • D4.0, 2010-06 – for ballot (WG3) • D5.0, 2010-08 – for ballot (WG4) • D6.0, 2010-09 – first sponsor ballot, includes MEC change (SB0) • D7.0, 2011-02 – Sponsor recirc #1 (SB1) • D8.0, 2011-03 – Sponsor Recirc #2 (SB2) • D9.0, 2011-05 – Sponsor Recirc #3 (SB3) • D9.01 Speculative editing of SB3 editorials/terminology Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  19. Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D8.0.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D8.0 Redline*.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-10-1284-08-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-10-1455-06-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments.xls Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  20. Comment Status (2011-07-07) Note – Ad-hoc Notes counts those comments with non-blank ad-hoc notes, an indication of some progress towards a resolution. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  21. Editorial comment resolutions • Comment resolutions are proposed in document 11-10/1455r8. • The group is requested to pay particular attention to the “Technical*” tabs, as these introduce some normative language. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  22. Status of MIB • MIB compiles, after fixing one compilation error (see CID 13013) • Please also be aware that the 802.11 MC process proposal (see 11-11-0615-03-0000-WG802.11 MC process) requires the MIB to compile prior to sponsor ballot and to resolve any compliance issues introduced by an amendment. • There is a meeting slot (monday pm2) set aside to review this process and determine support or otherwise for it • TGaa, TGae and TGad have been through the 11MC process and their MIBs have been modifies to comply – i.e. they compile and introduce no new compliance issues. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  23. Status of 802.11s • D12 will the version edited. • IEEE-SA are working on this now and understand our need for “early August” sources. • If necessary, I will edit in a “pre-publication” edit and track subsequent changes to publication. • Any slip here will directly impact our plan Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  24. Plan • Note – does not include effect of Editor holiday Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  25. Plan - 2 • The submission deadline for Dec RevCom is prior to the November EC sessions. • This is not possible • So best route to approval is November EC and Jan RevCom (continuous process), with publication in Jan/Feb. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  26. E-motion 1 • Approve comment resolutions in 11-10-1455-08-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments on the following tabs: • Editorials • MEC • Technical • Technical - Ensures • Moved: • Seconded: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  27. E-motion 2 • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the initial Sponsor Ballot on P802.11REVmb D9.0, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 10.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Sponsor Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D10.0 be forwarded to RevCom?” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  28. May 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  29. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  30. Numbering • Keeping all comments from WG and Sponsor ballots in the same spreadsheet. • The initial sponsor ballot is shown as LB 1000 • Comments from 10000 onwards • The first recirc is LB1001 • Comments from 11000 onwards • The second recirc is LB1002 • Comments from 12001 to 12863 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  31. SB2 Commenters Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  32. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. • D3.0 – balloted as LB162 • D3.02 – editing of LB162 technical • D4.0 – for ballot • D4.01 – Speculative editing of LB163 editorials • D5.0 – for ballot • D6.0 – first sponsor ballot, includes MEC change • D7.0 – Sponsor recirc #1 (SB1) • D7.01 – 802.11v roll-in • D7.02 – Speculative editing of LB1001 editorials • D7.03 – 802.11u roll-in • D7.04 – Editing of remaining approved comment resolutions + Defects from D7.01, D7.02 & D7.03 • D 7.05 – defect resolution from D7.04 • D8.0 – Sponsor Recirc #2 (SB2) • D8.01 Speculative editing of SB2 editorials/terminology Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  33. Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D8.0.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D8.0 Redline*.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-10-1284-08-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-10-1455-06-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments.xls Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  34. Comment Status (2011-05-09) Note – Ad-hoc Notes counts those comments with non-blank ad-hoc notes, an indication of some progress towards a resolution. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  35. Editorial comment resolutions • Comment resolutions are proposed in document 11-10/1455r6. • See also document 11-11-0595-00-000m-SB2-editorials, which describes resolutions in detail • The group is requested to pay particular attention to the “Terminology – technical impact” tab, as this introduces some normative language. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  36. Status of MIB • MIB compiles, but many conformance errors • Please see 11-11-0544-00-000m-fixing-the-mib • Please also be aware that the 802.11 MEC process proposal (see 11-11-0615-00-0000-WG802.11 MEC process) assumes we will continue to maintain the MIB, and attempts to avoid some of the errors of the past and will require the MIB to compile prior to sponsor ballot. • Telecon on 6 May 2011 shows that there is inadequate support for either deleting the MIB, partitioning it, or addressing compliance issues. So the status quo will be preserved, with a warning. • Add the following to the DESCRIPTION at 1842.37 (D8.0): • “Note that not all objects within this MIB are referenced by a group, and not all groups are referenced by a MODULE-COMPLIANCE statement. Some existing groups and the dot11Compliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE have been modified since the previous revision of this standard. Implementations should not claim compliance to dot11Compliance.” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  37. E-motion 1 • Approve comment resolutions in 11-10-1455-06-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments on the “Editorials and Trivial Technical” tabs. • 40 Agree, 17 Principle, 8 Disagree • Moved: • Seconded: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  38. E-motion 2 • Approve comment resolutions in 11-10-1455-06-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments on the “Terminology” tab. • 31 Agree, 10 Principle, 1 Disagree • Moved: • Seconded: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  39. E-motion 3 • Approve comment resolutions in 11-10-1455-06-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments on the “Terminology – may be a” tab. • 104 Agree, 268 Principle, 108 Disagree • Moved: • Seconded: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  40. E-motion 4 • Approve comment resolutions in 11-10-1455-06-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments on the “Terminology – technical impact” tab. • 41 Agree, 19 Principle, 14 Disagree • Moved: • Seconded: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  41. E-motion • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the initial Sponsor Ballot on P802.11REVmb D8.0, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 9.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Sponsor Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D9.0 be forwarded to RevCom?” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  42. March 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  43. Balloting Status Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  44. Numbering • Keeping all comments from WG and Sponsor ballots in the same spreadsheet. • The initial sponsor ballot is shown as LB 1000 • Comments from 10000 onwards • The first recirc is LB1001 • Comments from 11000 onwards Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  45. Comment Status (2011-03-10) ** This was the comment to which two comments were attached. As a placeholder, it doesn’t need approval of TGmb as the comments attached appear separately in the database. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  46. REVmb Draft Numbering History (part) • D1.0, 2009-05 – balloted as LB149 • D2.0, 2009-12 – completion of LB149 edits. Balloted version. • D3.0 – balloted as LB162 • D3.02 – editing of LB162 technical • D4.0 – for ballot • D4.01 – Speculative editing of LB163 editorials • D5.0 – for ballot • D6.0 – first sponsor ballot, includes MEC change • D7.0 – Sponsor recirc #1 • D7.01 – 802.11v roll-in • D7.02 – Speculative editing of LB1001 editorials • D7.03 – 802.11u roll-in • D7.04 – Editing of remaining approved comment resolutions + Defects from D7.01, D7.02 & D7.03 • D 7.05?? – defect resolution from D7.04 • D8.0 – Sponsor Recirc #2 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  47. Documents • REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website) • Draft P802.11REVmb_D7.03.pdf • Draft P802.11REVmb_D7.03 Redline*.pdf • Composite comments (all ad-hocs) • 11-10-1284-05-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls • Comments assigned to / held by editor • For: resolution, editing or other action • 11-10-1455-05-000m-revmb-sponsor-ballot-editor-comments.xls Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  48. 802.11v Roll-in Status • D7.01 contains .11v • D7.01 has completed review by volunteers from former TGv (71 defects were reported) • Defects will be resolved in a revision prior to D8.0 • There are a significant number of Editor’s Notes highlighting issues that need to be addressed. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  49. 802.11u Roll-in Status • Our current Plan of Record shows rolling in 802.11u in March. However, .11v roll-in went quicker than expected, and IEEE-SA publication editing for .11u completed earlier than expected • D7.03 contains .11u. D7.03 is currently in review by volunteers from former TGu. • There are a number of Editor’s Notes highlighting issues that need to be addressed. • Editorial Defects will be resolved in a revision prior to D8.0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  50. Planning • As indicated earlier, 802.11v and 802.11u will be in D8. • Experience from .11v suggests 2 weeks roll-in duration (not including review) is reasonable for.11s. • An adjusted plan of record has been produced taking this into account – see later • Shows completing comment resolution In Oct • Dependent on .11s being available for editing at the start of June Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

More Related