350 likes | 508 Views
Field Quantization Without Divergences. John R. Klauder University of Florida Gainesville, FL. Dirac on Divergences.
E N D
Field Quantization Without Divergences John R. Klauder University of Florida Gainesville, FL
Dirac on Divergences Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: 'Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.' I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this so-called 'good theory' does involve neglecting infinities which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics. Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a quantity when it is small - not neglecting it just because it is infinitely great and you do not want it! .
Frequently Asked Questions • No divergences. Is that possible? YES • What is the ‘‘cost’’? AN UNUSUAL LOCAL COUNTER TERM • Basic strategy? SOLVE NONRENORMALIZABLE CASES • Which fields? SCALARS (HIGGS), [GRAVITY, FERMIONS]
Outline • Background (Scalar Fields); Basic Proposal • Free/Pseudofree Models • Why Divergences Arise • How Divergences Appear • Relevance for Scalar Fields • The Cure: ‘‘Measure Mashing’’ • Lattice Hamiltonian • Lattice Action • Monte Carlo Evidence • Other Fields • Origin of Measure Mashing
Free/Pseudofree Models F CON. g
Free/Pseudofree Models PF DISCON. F CON. AN “AMPUTATED” ACTION FUNCTIONAL g
Scalar Fields B.I. PF NONREN. F REN. g o AN “AMPUTATED” ACTION FUNCTIONAL
Ground State Distribution WILL THE GUILTY VARIABLES THAT LEAD TO DIVERGENCES PLEASE RAISE THEIR HANDS
Counter Term s=2
Lattice Hamiltonian B.I.
Summary • Lattice ground state wave function ‘‘=’’ Lattice Hamiltonian‘‘=’’Lattice action • Origin of divergences traced to power of the hyper-spherical radius • Measure mashing changes mutuallysingular measures into equivalent measures • Finite spatial moments implies finite spacetime moments • Monte Carlo supports non-triviality
Feynman on Divergences . The shell game that we play ... is technically called 'renormalization'. But no matter how clever the word, it is still what I would call a dippy process! Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. It's surprising that the theory still hasn't been proved self-consistent one way or the other by now; I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.
References • ``Scalar Field Quantization Without Divergences In All Spacetime Dimensions'' J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.44, 273001 (2011); arXiv:1101.1706 • ``Divergences in Scalar Quantum Field Theory: The Cause and the Cure'', Mod. Phys. Lett. A27, 1250117 (9pp) (2012); arXiv:1112.0803 • Ultralocal model scalar quantum fields: ‘‘BeyondConventional Quantization’’ (Cambridge, 2000 & 2005) • ‘‘Recent Results Regarding Affine Quantum Gravity’’, J. Math. Phys. 53, 082501 (19pp) (2012); arXiv:1203.0691