1 / 19

FM Model Assessment: Old scores and New Combinations

FM Model Assessment: Old scores and New Combinations. ShuoYong Shi Nick Grishin Lab. Scores used in CASP5 Assessment* : Ten scores encompass structure and sequence characteristics. GDT Distance DALI Qdali CE Qce Mammoth Qmm LGA Qlga SOV. Generate Scores.

Download Presentation

FM Model Assessment: Old scores and New Combinations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FM Model Assessment: Old scores and New Combinations ShuoYong Shi Nick Grishin Lab

  2. Scores used in CASP5 Assessment*:Ten scoresencompass structure and sequencecharacteristics GDT Distance DALI Qdali CE Qce Mammoth Qmm LGA Qlga SOV Generate Scores Q ratios: Correctly aligned residues/ target length *Kinch LN, et al. Proteins. 2003; 53 Suppl 6:395-409

  3. Structure Score Distributions: Target 531 GDT Dali Distance Mammoth

  4. Structure Score Distributions: Target 531 GDT Dali 399_5 113_1 360_4 Distance Mammoth 113_2 119_1 215_1 399_5

  5. Sequence Score Distributions: Target 531 Qlga Qdali 1_3 399_5 SOV Qmm 55_1 208_2

  6. Bad Score Distributions: Target 531 CE Qce

  7. Replace Score Distributions: Target 531 CE Qce Tmalign Qtm 113_4 490_2

  8. Combine Ten Scores: TenS • Strategy to combine scores: • Transform raw scores to Z-scores • 2) Sum of Z-scores using equal weight (TenS) • Throw out zeros, calculate Z-score • Throw out raw score with Z-score<-2, recalculate mean and std • Recalculate Z-score on entire population, and assign Z-score <-2 to -2.

  9. Combine Scores (TenS): Target 531 GDT winner: TS399_5 TenS winner: TS208_2 GDT TenS

  10. Combine Main Scores: TenS, QCS, GDT, and CS Score Used in Components Raw Form TenS new 10 (GDT) Z score QCS new 6 (CS) % Max GDT CASP* % Max CS CASP8 % Max Strategy to combine scores: 1) Transform raw scores to Z-scores 2) Sum of Z-scores for each target (ComS)

  11. Additional Score: Comparison to top server Model Motivation: Top performing groups use similar strategies that rank server models with various scoring functions and refine top picks Who did better than servers? Score Strategy: Ratio of best group model scores to top server model for each of the main scores

  12. Additional Score: Comparison to top server Model • Server Ratio Score Combinations: • Ratio scores below 1 are ignored • Average Scores(4) for each target • Sum score averages The Sum of average ratios (which are rarely much larger than 1) indicates the number of times each group outperformed servers

  13. Additional Score: Comparison to top server Model (Target 531 Example) Top Servers

  14. Additional Score: Comparison to top server Model (Combined Scores) Outperformed servers 14 times Servers

  15. Report Scores: Many, Many, Many Sortable Tables and a Web Site http://prodata.swmed.edu/CASP9/evaluation/CASP9Home.htm

  16. Report Scores: Many, Many, Many Sortable Tables and a Web Site

  17. Report Scores: Many, Many, Many Sortable Tables and a Web Site

  18. Report Scores: Many, Many, Many Sortable Tables and a Web Site

  19. Report Scores: Many, Many, Many Sortable Tables and a Web Site What’s the final ranking?

More Related