1 / 21

Mean-field electrodynamics → no local fields considered

Cellular Dynamo in a Rotating Spherical Shell Alexander Getling Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow, Russia Radostin Simitev, Friedrich Busse University of Bayreuth, Germany. The problem of solar dynamo: interplay between global and local magnetic fields needs to be included.

colman
Download Presentation

Mean-field electrodynamics → no local fields considered

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cellular Dynamo in a RotatingSpherical ShellAlexander GetlingLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscow, RussiaRadostin Simitev,Friedrich Busse University of Bayreuth, Germany

  2. The problem of solar dynamo:interplay between global and local magnetic fields needs to be included Mean-field electrodynamics → no local fields considered Possible alternative → “deterministic” dynamo with well-defined structural elements in the flow and magnetic field

  3. Kinematic model of cellular dynamo(cell = toroidal eddy): A.V. Getling and B.A. Tverskoy, Geomagn. Aeron. 11, 211, 389 (1971)

  4. Convective mechanism of magnetic-field amplification and structuring

  5. This study is based on numerical simulations of cellular magnetoconvection in a rotating spherical shell

  6. The problem • Spherical fluid shell • Stress-free, electrically insulating boundaries with perfect heat conductivity • Uniformly distributed internal heat sources • Boussinesq approximation • A small quadratic term is present in thetemperaturedependence of density

  7. The geometry of the problem

  8. Static temperature profile

  9. Physical parameters of the problem

  10. The case discussed here Geometrical parameter: η = 0.6 Physical parameters: Ri = 3000, Re = − 6000, τ= 10, P= 1, Pm=30 Computational parameter: m = 5

  11. Static profiles of temperatureand its gradient

  12. Pseudospectral code employed: F.H. Busse, E. Grote, and A. Tilgner,Stud. Geophys. Geod.42, 211 (1998)

  13. Radial velocity at r=ri+0.5d t = 98.73

  14. Azimuthal velocity and meridional streamlines t = 98.73

  15. Radial magnetic field at r=ro+0.7d t = 98.73 t = 101.73

  16. Radial magnetic field at r=ro

  17. Azimuthal magnetic field and meridional field lines t = 95.73 t = 101.73

  18. Variations in poloidal components H10and H20at r = 0.5

  19. Variations in full magnetic energy

  20. Variations in dipolar-field energy axisymm. pol. axisymm. tor. asymm. pol. asymm. tor.

  21. Thank you for your attention

More Related