1 / 18

Simulating Mergers

Simulating Mergers. MSc Regulation and Competition March 2005. Overview. This talk on ideas and methods Instruction for the software Practice with the software Input into coursework. Merger simulation overview. Legal framework Limitations of earlier approaches What merger simulation is

colman
Download Presentation

Simulating Mergers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simulating Mergers MSc Regulation and Competition March 2005

  2. Overview • This talk on ideas and methods • Instruction for the software • Practice with the software • Input into coursework

  3. Merger simulation overview • Legal framework • Limitations of earlier approaches • What merger simulation is • Key assumptions: the economics • Implementation • Uses and limitations

  4. Legal framework “Balance of advantage” arguments admitted: • US anti trust enforcement: application of rule of reason. Merger guidelines on HHI • EU Merger Regulation and task force • “create or strengthen an dominant position” • UK Enterprise Act 2002…“substantial lessening of competition”

  5. Standard approaches • Define the market • Work out market shares and entry barriers • Apply judgement on dominance and likely effects

  6. Difficulties • Delineation of market not clear (geographic or product) • Differing degrees of substitution • What would be the impact of merger • pricing • allowing for cost savings

  7. Merger simulation Used in arguing for or against • A model of market • typically calibrated by econometric analysis • Making assumptions about behaviour • Effects on prices and welfare estimated • Alternative scenarios and assumptions can be tested

  8. Example cases • Staples/Office Depot (FTC) • FTC predict 7% increase • 15% pass-through rate • WorldCom/Sprint (FCC) • Effects on long distance prices • Volvo/Scandia (EU - example) • Price rises in national markets • Kimberley Clark (Company)

  9. Behaviour assumptions • Mainly Nash equilibria: • Cournot (quantity setting) • Bertrand (price setting) Nash equilibria look at “unilateral effects” • Also possibility of looking at collusion effects

  10. The Cournot model • Other firms’ outputs are fixed • Choose output to maximise profits • Unique equilibrium: • market share depends on relative marginal cost • Most relevant for: • homogeneous products • markets with important capacity decisions

  11. Bertrand • Mainly for differentiated products=> Chamberlin model • Own- and cross-elasticities relevant • Simple formula: (Pi - MCi)/Pi = -1/ Ei • BUT Ei may not be constant • choice of demand function matters (Crooke et al)

  12. Demand functions Depends on how fast elasticity rises with price • Extremes: • constant elasticity • linear • Intermediate • Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS) • Logit • Probit

  13. Qualifications • No substitute for understanding the market • Apparent precision is spurious • Miss out key features of reality e.g. potential competition

  14. Arguments for • “Scientific” – assumptions explicit

  15. “Merger Simulation is Science • “Based on well-established economic theory • E.g., econometric theory, theory of consumer demand, and oligopoly theory • Underlying assumptions are clearly laid out and can often be tested • Demand model can be tested • Nash-Bertrand assumption can be tested by comparison to pre-merger margins • Process and results can be replicated • A third party following the same steps would reach the same results • Even though there are modeling choices along the way, these choices are fully described “ • (extract from Leonard presentation)

  16. Sources of software • Canadian Competition Authority • Cournot model • http://csgb.ubc.ca/ccpp/simulation/ • Vanderbilt University • Bertrand, linear demand • http://mss.math.vanderbilt.edu/~pscrooke/MSS/linearmerger.html • http://www.antitrust.org/simulation.html • These give limited control over outputs For this exercise we grew our own teaching aids

  17. Running the software • Excel file with macros • DiffProdStud1.xls or Coursework handout • cournot-102.xls

  18. Further reading • Numerous papers by Froeb and Werden • Crooke Froeb and Tschantz on functional forms • Greg Leonard (Nera) In defense of merger simulation http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/workshops/docs/202615.pdf • Mike Walker (Charles Rivers Associates) Paper to Industrial Economics Study group Nottingham, December 2005

More Related