1 / 14

New F&A Waiver Strategy

New F&A Waiver Strategy. Tentative! Pending final approval at this time!. Current F&A Challenges. Large amounts of foregone F&A restrict institutional capabilities Institutional risk exists due to inconsistent treatment F&A Waiver process needs to be streamlined

Download Presentation

New F&A Waiver Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New F&A Waiver Strategy Tentative! Pending final approval at this time!

  2. Current F&A Challenges • Large amounts of foregone F&A restrict institutional capabilities • Institutional risk exists due to inconsistent treatment • F&A Waiver process needs to be streamlined • $1.87M waived in first four months of FY08 • 76 requests • ~50% for projects under $50K direct costs/yr • Spread across all fund sources

  3. Peer Positions • F&A Waivers not granted to for-profits (UC all campuses, Stanford, Michigan, Washington, MIT, Michigan State, Purdue) • F&A Waivers not granted to foreign entities (UC all campuses, Stanford, Penn State, MIT, Michigan State, Purdue)

  4. Minnesota F&A Rates are Competitive • U of Washington 56.0% • UC San Diego 54.5% • UC San Francisco 54.0% • UC Los Angeles 54.0% • UC Berkeley 53.5% • U of Illinois 53.0% (UIC at 57%) • U of Michigan 52.0% • U of Minnesota 51.0% • Ohio State 50.0% • Wisconsin 48.5% • North Carolina 46.0% (FY08 under negotiation)

  5. Proposed New Strategy F&A Waiver Requests • SPA • PI Transfers • Non-profits with • published policy • Special governmental • programs • Projects which move • from off-campus to • on-campus. Administrative Waivers Strategic Waivers Regular Waivers • Deans • Small Project Waiver • (<$50K direct cost/yr) • Other Reductions • above minimums • VPR • Waivers or reductions • below minimums Tracked Tracked

  6. Proposed F&A Rate Minimums (awards over $50K direct costs/year) • Federal ……………………………… Federally negotiated rate* • Foreign government ………………... Federally negotiated rate* • For-profit …………………………… 34% • State of Minnesota ………………….. 0% (for now) • Non-profit/foundations ……...…….. Published policy or 10% TDC** • Corporate affiliate programs ……….. 10% TDC • Industry-funded clinical trials …… 26% TDC * or as approved by SPA ** Use published policy if it exists, otherwise, 10% TDC

  7. Waivers No Longer Available for: • Projects that did not receive institutional endorsement prior to submission to Sponsor • F&A waivers or reductions of rates negotiated by PIs with Sponsors If reduced F&A is needed in these instances, the Unit must set up a cost-sharing account to pay the difference between the Sponsor- approved rate and the federally negotiated rate or approved minimum for this type of project.

  8. Potential Reasons to Approve Waivers • Seed grants which may attract larger awards • Hardship for new PI • Awards which include equipment or building funds • Community relations or library projects • Student services projects (or increase funding to pay for students) • Capped awards • Department committed to undertake the research regardless of external funding (e.g., any dollar gained is better than nothing) • Small cost • Junior faculty or incoming faculty member • Enhance cultural/artistic activities (small projects only) • Only available source of funds in an area • Strategic partnerships

  9. Potential Reasons to Disapprove Waivers • Precedent setting • Grounds on which the waiver might be justified to other faculty whose projects carry full overhead • Consistency with similar sponsors or programs • Large total cost to the University • Any IP rights granted to the sponsor • Past history of PI requesting waivers • Profit-making entities • Foreign entities

  10. F&A Waiver Process Improvements • Eliminate formal waiver process for projects less than $50K/year –dean’s signature on PRF will signify approval • SPA has created a list of agencies with pre-approved rates (based on policy); proof of agency policy is no longer required to accompany PRFs when submitting to these entities • SPA has new “Foregone F&A calculator” to help Deans and SPA better understand and track foregone amounts • Waiver requests must be submitted in advance (4 business days for regular waivers, 7 business days for strategic waivers) • Can’t make the deadline? Submit with full F&A!

  11. Approval Timelines Timeline Still under Consideration! Regular Waivers • Day 1: Info to Dean(s) • Day 2: PI notified by Dean of approval/disapproval • Day 3: PI/Dept adjusts proposal if needed & submit to SPA • Day 4: SPA proposal review Strategic Waivers • Day 1: Info to Dean(s) • Day 2-4: Dean(s), VPR, Chair, PI, SPA confer • Day 5: PI notified of approval/disapproval • Day 6: PI/Dept adjusts proposal if needed & submit to SPA • Day 7: SPA proposal review

  12. Proposal for New Waiver Strategy Rollout Proposed for April 1, 2008 • Streamlined waiver approval process implemented • Dean’s approval for small waivers implemented • SPA endorsement for administrative waivers implemented • No waivers granted for proposals submitted without endorsement • Reductions for for-profits and foreign governments beyond pre-set minimum level requires VPR approval • Other F&A minimums considered “targets” • PIs informed that they may not negotiate F&A rates Proposed for January 1, 2009 • F&A minimum levels for all categories implemented

  13. Questions?

More Related