70 likes | 160 Views
Points of view for our choise of control system: Commercially availability Reliability Man power necessary to implement the system Maintainance and future developments PLC (Siemens Simatic, Beckhoff Busterminals) for process layer WinCC (Siemens) for slow control
E N D
Points of view for our choise of control system: • Commercially availability • Reliability • Man power necessary to implement the system • Maintainance and future developments • PLC (Siemens Simatic, Beckhoff Busterminals) for process layer • WinCC (Siemens) for slow control • PXI with Labwindows/ Labview (National Instruments) for image acquisition and beam diagnostics
WinCC (Windows Control Center) Running on PCs with Windows NT/ 2000 SCADA System including Runtime System and Development Tools Contains: Data manager Data base (Sybase SQL Anywhere) Archiving system Alarm modul Tag logging Access control Editor for graphical user interface
WinCC – Mainfeatures: • Up to 6 WinCC Server with Redundancy • Up to 16 WinCC Clients • Max. 64.000 “Power Tags” • Min. time for Tag Logging 250ms • OPC Service • SQL Interface • Web Service
Integration of Labwindows/ Labview Applications • Used for triggered DAQ at Diagnostic Elements as are: • Stripline Monitors • Rf- Parameters • Beam Viewers with Cameras and Frame Grabber • Interaction with WinCC via OPC
Experience and Conclusions The Systems are suitable to implement a Control System for an Accelerator Facility The System works stable and reliable Drawbacks are: To implement a modified Project one has to stop the WinCC Server The Access Control in WinCC is associated to the Objects in the GUI, not to the Parameter itself