1 / 52

Convective Parameterization

Convective Parameterization. Jack Kain and Mike Baldwin OAR/NSSL/CIMMS. What is Convective Parameterization?.

como
Download Presentation

Convective Parameterization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Convective Parameterization Jack Kain and Mike Baldwin OAR/NSSL/CIMMS

  2. What is Convective Parameterization? • A technique used in NWP to predict the collective effects of (many) convective clouds that may exist within a single grid element…As a function of larger-scale processes and/or conditions

  3. Eta Grid Points

  4. Why do NWP models need to worry about it? • Direct concern • To predict convective precipitation • Feedback to larger scales • Deep convection “overturns” the atmosphere, strongly affecting mesoscale and larger scale dynamics • Changes vertical stability • Redistributes and generates heat • Redistributes and removes moisture • Makes clouds, strongly affecting surface heating and atmospheric radiation

  5. How Does the Feedback Occur in a Model? • At every grid point, predictive variables change at each time step as a function of a number of processes, including convection…

  6. …when activated, a convective parameterization computes the changes in temperature and moisture (and possibly cloud water, momentum, etc.) that would occur at each vertical level if convection developed in the given grid-point environment • for example • where tc is a convective timescale, typically 30min to 1hr

  7. How to Parameterize... • Relate unresolved effects (convection) to grid-scale properties using statistical or empirical techniques • What properties of convection do we need to predict? • convective triggering (yes/no) • convective intensity (how much rain?) • vertical distribution of heating • vertical distribution of drying

  8. When, where, and how much... • Triggering (always requires positive area on a thermodynamic [e.g., Skew-T Log-P] diagram) - Different approaches 1.) mass or moisture convergence exceeding a certain threshold at a grid point, or 2.) positive destabilization rate, or 3.) perturbed parcels can reach their level of free convection, or 4.) sufficient cloud layer moisture

  9. When, where, and how much... • Convective intensity (net heating) • proportional to mass or moisture convergence • sufficient to offset large-scale destabilization rate • sufficient to eliminate CAPE (constrained by available moisture)

  10. When, where, and how much... • Vertical distribution of heating and drying • determined by nudging to empirical reference profiles • estimated using a simple 1-D cloud model to satisfy the constraints on intensity

  11. Quasi-equilibrium schemes • Arakawa-Schubert for example • Large-scale destabilization rate ~ convective stabilization rate • Convective stabilization is achieved by an ensemble of cloud types

  12. Convergence schemes • Kuo-type schemes • If: • atmosphere is conditionally unstable • horizontal moisture (or maybe mass) convergence is positive • Then: • converged moisture is assumed to go up in deep convective clouds (rather than broadscale ascent) • convective heating is distributed vertically according to the distribution of T’-T where T’ is the moist adiabatic profile of most unstable air • moisture is all condensed out (or a specified fraction is condensed out)

  13. Current EMC models use different approaches • RUC II: Grell scheme • Eta: Betts-Miller-Janjic (Kain-Fritsch used experimentally) • MRF/AVN: Grell-Pan scheme • Grell, Grell-Pan, and Kain-Fritsch schemes are Mass-Fluxschemes*, meaning they use simple cloud models to simulate rearrangements of mass in a vertical column • Betts-Miller-Janjic adjusts to “mean post-convective profiles” based on observational studies

  14. Grell and Grell-Pan Schemes • Initiation (on/off) 1.) Find highest qe air in column below ~400mb level…does CAPE exist? 2.) Evaluate CAP strength: Does lifted parcel reach LFC (level of free convection) within 150 mb of its source level? 3.) Is large-scale destabilization rate > 0? (i.e. is d(CAPE)/dt > 0?) • If yes to all 3, initiate convection...

  15. Grell and Grell-Pan Schemes • Characteristics of convection • use simple models of an updraft and downdraft to simulate mass rearrangements by convection • make updraft and downdraft mass fluxes strong enough that their stabilizing effect approximately balances rate of large-scale destabilization:

  16. Grell and Grell-Pan Schemes • Feeding back the effects of convection • Introduce tendency terms in the prognostic equations for temperature and moisture: • where a represents T or qv

  17. Kain-Fritsch Scheme • Basic operating procedures are similar to Grell-type schemes except… • Convective inhibition evaluated in terms of negative area, not pressure depth • Large-scale destabilization not required, only CAPE • Updraft and downdraft formulations more sophisticated • Convective intensity based on instantaneous CAPE value rather than d(CAPE)/dt

  18. Betts-Miller-Janjic Scheme • Checks for CAPE, cloud depth, using highest qe air in lowest 130mb above surface • makes a “first-guess” at a reference temperature profile based on a moist adiabat • makes a corresponding first guess reference profile for moisture based on an imposed sub-saturation (~relative humidity) • imposes enthalpy conservation

  19. Enthalpy conservation • This usually requires an adjustment to the “first-guess” profiles (“sliding over” on a skew-T) of both T and q • Implications of this adjustment: • BMJ convection will be weak (or non-existent) when cloud column RH is low even if CAPE exists, increase with intensity as column moistens • Nudges grid-scale T, q to convectively adjusted profiles over a ~1h time scale

  20. Kain-Fritsch convective initiation check • Beginning at the surface, mix in model layers overhead until a mixture 50-100mb deep is found. This compromises a potential updraft source layer. Find mean q, qv of this layer. • Lift a parcel with these characteristics to its LCL. At the LCL, compute a temperature perturbation, DTp based on grid point vertical velocity: • DTp = (wg - wc)1/3 + DTp(RH) • where wg is the grid point vertical velocity (cm/s), • wc is a correction factor wc=2*Z(LCL)/2km

  21. Kain-Fritsch convective initiation check • For example: • wg - wc=1 cm/s -> DTp=1.0 K • wg - wc=10 cm/s -> DTp=2.5 K • In the Eta Model, an additional perturbation, DTp (RH) (magnitude ~0.5K) is given to account for low RH • So…In a typical convective environment with some larger-scale forcing, • DTp ~ 1 - 2 K

  22. Kain-Fritsch convective initiation check • Is (DTp(LCL) + DTp) > Tg???? • If no, move up one model level and repeat process above • If yes, compute a vertical velocity perturbation, Wp, based on magnitude of DTp. • For DTp=1.5K, Wp ~ 4-5 m/s

  23. Kain-Fritsch convective initiation check • Release a parcel at the LCL with T given by Tp(LCL) and vertical velocity Wp, begin solving “parcel buoyancy equation” at model levels overhead • Determine cloud top as highest model level where Wp > 0

  24. Kain-Fritsch convective initiation check • Is Z(top) - Z(LCL) > 3km? • If yes, initiate deep convection from this source layer • If no, remember this layer as a possible source for shallow convection, move up to next potential source layer and repeat all above steps • If no potential source layer in the lowest 300mb can generate a convective cloud, move on to next grid point

  25. Stabilizing mechanisms of Kain-Fritsch • Convective Updraft • removes high qe air from lower troposphere, transports it aloft • generates condensation

  26. Stabilizing mechanisms of Kain-Fritsch • Convective Downdraft • draws mass from layer beginning at cloud base and extending up 150-200mb • deposits low qe air in sub-cloud layers • assumed to be saturated above cloud base, RH decreasing at ~10%/km below • continues until it either 1) reaches the surfaces or 2) becomes warmer than the environment • mass flux = updraft mass flux at cloud base

  27. Stabilizing mechanisms of Kain-Fritsch • Return flow, i.e., “compensating subsidence” • compensates for any mass surplus or deficit created by updraft and downdraft • typically the updraft creates a mass surplus aloft and deficit below so that return flow is downward

  28. Kain-Fritsch precipitation amounts • It depends… • Updraft generates condensation • Updraft dumps condensate into environment • Downdraft evaporates condensate at a rate that depends on • RH of downdraft source air • depth of downdraft • Any leftover condensate accumulates at the ground as precipitation

  29. Consider some typical convective environments

  30. Negative Precipitation

  31. Shallow convection allowed

  32. BMJ Heating/Drying profiles • heating K/hr • drying %RH/hr

  33. Increase cloud layer RH by 20%

  34. Deep convection allowed

  35. Heating/Drying profiles

  36. Kain-Fritsch Trigger • Increase source layer Td by 1 K • some parcels break cap, initiate deep convection updraft path updraft source layer downdraft path

  37. Kain-Fritsch adjusted profile

  38. Heating/Drying profiles

  39. BMJ 1st guess profiles

  40. After enthalply adjustment • Deep convection allowed • Strong cooling from 850-600mb • rainfall = 0.032 cm/h

  41. Heating/drying profiles

  42. Increase cloud-layer RH by 5% • Rainfall = 0.211 cm/h

  43. Increase cloud-layer RH by 10% • Rainfall = 0.388 cm/h

  44. RH increased 10%

  45. Convective Rainfall vs. Change in cloud-layer RH Precip Amount Change in cloud-layer RH

  46. BMJ Oklahoma Tornadoes • Too dry for deep convection • can see shallow convection grow with time

  47. BMJ Oklahoma Tornadoes • Still too dry • 24h fcst valid 5 Oct 98

More Related