1 / 3

RESOLUTE US

RESOLUTE US. One-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal Multicenter RESOLUTE US Study. Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in a US population SUBJECTS 1,402 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries

conlan
Download Presentation

RESOLUTE US

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RESOLUTE US One-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal Multicenter RESOLUTE US Study Objective • To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in a US population SUBJECTS • 1,402 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries PRIMARY ENDPOINT • 12-month target lesion failure (TLF) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) CONTROL • Historical data from Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) trials, adjusting for baseline covariates through propensity scores

  2. RESOLUTE US • 12 Month Results • TLF was 3.7% in R-ZES versus 6.5% in historical E-ZES data • R-ZES met the 3.3% margin of noninferiority • Overall TLF rate was 4.7

  3. RESOLUTE US Conclusions • Very low rate of clinical restenosis and low need for repeat revascularization that was achieved on very high compliance of dual antiplatelet therapy are reassuring for challenging patients with diabetes mellitus and small-sized vessels • Low rates of important clinical safety events, such as death, MI, and stent thrombosis (similar rates with R-ZES compared with earlier E-ZES) • Further trials are required to demonstrate long-term efficacy and safety of the R-ZES

More Related