1 / 101

Managing Milfoil: Control Options for Eurasian Water Milfoil

Learn effective control options for managing Eurasian Water Milfoil, including physical, biological, mechanical, and chemical methods. Understand the life history of milfoil and implement an integrated pest management approach for successful control.

conlon
Download Presentation

Managing Milfoil: Control Options for Eurasian Water Milfoil

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 14 Sept 2019, NJCOLAPart 1 – Managing MilfoilPart 2 – What the HABs is Going On? Stephen J. Souza, Ph.D. Clean Waters Consulting, LLC SJSouza.CWC@gmail.com

  2. Thanks To

  3. Part 1 Managing Milfoil

  4. Eurasian Water Milfoil

  5. Life History Eurasian Watermilfoil • Submerged and weakly rooted, perennial plant. • Grows in variety of conditions – depth, clarity, pH, salinity • Prefers disturbed areas, with fine sediments, and ample nutrients • Spreads by seeds and fragments...vegetative growth primary reproductive strategy. • Autofragmentation or fragmentation by wind, waves, etc. scatters fragments that set root resulting in a new plant. • Autofragmentation and flowering/seed peak in July. • Plants die back in fall, but roots remain alive...enable plant to start growing quickly in spring.

  6. Milfoil vs. Coontail vs. Parrot Feather

  7. Before You Begin Sample Map milfoil density and distribution

  8. Control Options • Physical • Biological • Mechanical • Chemical

  9. The IPM Approach • Integrated Pest Management • Know your pests, know life history the target species • Define management objectives • Be proactive – not reactive • Combine techniques...don’t put all “eggs in one basket” • Understand pros/cons, etc. of control techniques • When using herbicides understand selected product, mode of action, dose rate and application technique

  10. Physical Controls

  11. Weed Roller • Powered device used to slowly and continuously disrupt soft sediment • Agitation limits establishment of weeds • Applicable only for small areas; dock or pier

  12. Schematic of Unit in Operation

  13. Weed Roller Controlled Weed Growth Plants Vs. No Plants Note furrows in sand caused by fins on roller

  14. Benthic Mats • Used like black plastic in the flower bed. • Screen sediments from sunlight hampering weed and mat algae growth. • Need to use special material (negatively buoyant, durable and capable of venting trapped gas). • Cost approx $.70/ft2 for material only, $1.50/ft2 installed.

  15. Benthic Mat – Basic Material

  16. Benthic Mat - Preparation

  17. Benthic Mats https://lakebottomblanket.com/

  18. Lake Lowering • Lower lake in fall • Expose sediments to air • Allow sediments to freeze • Kill off milfoil fragments, roots and seeds

  19. Lake Lowering • Inexpensive • Unpredictable results • May increase spread of some other invasives ( e.g., curly leaf pond weed and water chestnut) • Requires NJDEP permit – • Extent of lower • Duration of lowering • Start of refill • Potential impact to fishery

  20. Water Dyes • Only feasible for small lakes/ponds with very slow flushing rate • Relatively inexpensive • Proactive, most effective if added before onset of a bloom • Could potentially increase water temp, but very unlikely significant • Bench test as could cause “off” color due to dissolved solids or turbidity • Some require NJDEP permit

  21. Biological Controls

  22. Biological ControlsGrass Carp and Milfoil Weevils

  23. Grass Carp • Not same fish as common carp • White amur, Ctenopharyngodon idella • Native to Amur River basin,China • Member of minnow family • May live 20 years, but usual life span is 5 to 7 years • May grow to as large as 20” and a weight of 5.5 pounds in 2 years

  24. Grass Carp vs Common Carp Grass carp Common carp

  25. NJDEP Permit Requirements • Certified triploid sterile fish. • Waterbody <10 acres in size. • Must have 40% weed cover . • Outlet barrier required. • Stocking guided by NJDEP. • Stock at least 8” fish in spring. • Stock conservatively…3-5/acre. • Monitor conditions.

  26. Milfoil Weevil • Aquatic milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsislecontei) feed exclusively on species of watermilfoil including Myriophyllum spicatum. • Native to U.S., but more common naturally in New England states than Mid-Atlantic • The southern limit is northern New Jersey • Larvae purchased from commercial “nurseries” http://aquaweed.com/pdf/progressive%20weevil.pdf

  27. Milfoil Weevil • Milfoil control mostly via larvae • The larvae are stem miners, but adults feed on the leaves • The weevil larvae about the size of a pin head

  28. Milfoil Weevil • As larvae bore through and feed on internal content of the stems, the plant is weakened and collapses • Weakened plant may be less able to over winter or to out-compete other aggressive plants

  29. Stocking Milfoil Weevils • Optimal stocking density approximately 1-3 weevils per stem...about $1.00/weevil • Typically introduce roughly 500 – 700 /acre • Introduced literally one at a time, laborious and costly • May take full season to see results, need to be patient!

  30. Milfoil Weevil – Down Side • Results may come slowly • Expensive • Larvae susceptible to climatic events (prolonged ice cover, exposed shoreline) • Larvae susceptible to fish predation • As milfoil densities decline so will densities of weevils…lake can become re-infested

  31. Mechanical Controls

  32. Harvesting • Cut and remove milfoil • Selectively reduce the density and coverage of nuisance or invasive plant species • Create boat access and navigation channels • Create fishing lanes • Improve circulation and water movement • Improve swimming and decrease plant density issues that affect safety

  33. Hand Harvesting

  34. Semi-Mechanical Harvesting

  35. Small Harvesters Most small, “homeowner” machines cut but don’t harvest. Need to manually rake up cut plant material. Lack the ability to handle dense growth.

  36. Truxor – Intermediate “Harvester” • Highly portable maneuverable. • Works in very shallow, confined areas. • Lightweight. • Relatively powerful. • Available with various attachments.

  37. Truxor Cut, Rake, Collect.

  38. Typical 8 ft Diesel Powered Harvester Pilot House Cut Weed Storage Area Cutting Bar Paddle Wheel Diesel Engine Compartment

  39. “Business End” Of Harvester Conveyor Side Cutter Bars Lower Cutter Bar

  40. Supplemental Transport Barge Barge docks on lake with harvester. Load conveyed from harvester to barge. Barge transports cut weeds to shore for offloading

  41. Shore Conveyors

  42. Off Loading and Disposal Fully automated, involves minimal manual labor. Filled trucks offload at disposal site which could be landfill, composting facility, or farm.

  43. Dewatering of Harvested Weeds

  44. Hydroraking • Mechanically remove milfoil by roots...longer term weed control. • Can be conducted selectively • Can operate in shallow water (< 2 ft, rake to 9 ft) and confined areas where harvesting is difficult • Slower, more expensive, “sloppier” than harvesting...NJDEP now requires permit.

  45. Hydroraking – Harvesting Alternative Paddle Wheel Propelled Barge Deep Tine Rake on Articulating, Extendable Arm

  46. Weeds Transferred to Harvester or Transport Barge Hydrorake Operation Extracted Weeds and Hydrosoil On Rake

  47. Miscellaneous Options • Suction dredge • Diver assisted hand pulling • Hand pulling • OK for small areas • Questionable efficiency • Could require NJDEP permit • Diver assisted options expensive

  48. Chemical Controls

More Related