1 / 25

Importance of Regional Collaborations in Biomedicine: Case Study of Western Sweden

Delve into the significance of regional collaborations in biomedicine using a case study of Western Sweden, focusing on collaborative patterns, motives, and partners in the industry.

connie
Download Presentation

Importance of Regional Collaborations in Biomedicine: Case Study of Western Sweden

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Do regional collaborations matter in biomedicine? The case of Western Sweden Jens Laage-HellmanIMIT and RIDE at Chalmers University of Technology Annika RickneIMIT, The Dahmén Institute and Lund University

  2. Background • ”Interactive research” on a regional development project (”Biomedical Development in Western Sweden”) • Purpose: study the dynamic mechanisms involved in RIS development • Underlying theoretical approach: Innovation systems • Functional approach • Research activities: • Documentation of the early history • Survey to biomedical firms • Survey to biomedical researchers • Present paper: collaboration patterns in industry

  3. Research puzzle • The interactive character of the innovation process • Acquisition and development of knowledge/resources • Learning • Customers/users, suppliers, universities… • Esp. In science-based and knowledge-intensive industries • The importance of regional collaboration/networking • Tacit nature of knowledge • Regions are the locus of innovation • Proximity matters! • Clustering of firms (e.g. in biotech) • Advantageous for individual firms to locate in strong clusters/RIS • The role of globalised collaboration/networking

  4. Research questions • Main question: Do regional collaborations matter in biomedicine? • Specific issues: • How does the firms value different types of knowledge? • Through what types of channels is knowledge identified and acquired? • What is the relative importance of different types of partners? • What are the reasons for collaboration? • To what extent is the geographical dimension important?

  5. Research design • Case: a) biomedicine, b) Western Sweden • Data collection: a) survey, b) complementing interviews

  6. The collaborative patterns in biomedicine: Crucial types of knowledge & their sources

  7. Patterns of collaboration

  8. Motives for collaboration with companies

  9. Motives for collaboration with universities

  10. Location of partners

  11. Main location of partners (industrial and health care)

  12. Location of partnering universities and research institutes

  13. Discussion and conclusions • 1. Collaboration with business partners • a/ Customers • Important R&D partners • Usually located outside the region • - small region/country + niche products • - ”borne globals” - need for country-specific adaptations • Important for small/young firms to have pioneering customers nearby (e.g. Sahlgrenska University Hospital)

  14. b/ Suppliers • Almost as important as customers (ESI) • Spurred by increasing ”outsourcing” (esp. medtech) • Advantageous to have local suppliers (esp. for SMEs) …..but often difficult to find • Lack of ”critical mass” in the industry: stimulate entry of supplier firms

  15. b/ Suppliers • Almost as important as customers (ESI) • Spurred by increasing ”outsourcing” (esp. medtech) • Advantageous to have local suppliers (esp. for SMEs) …..but often difficult to find • Lack of ”critical mass” in the industry: stimulate entry of supplier firms • Some policy-implications (business partners) • HC organ. that is open to industry collaboration • Not enough to support collaboration within the region • Need to support internationalisation of SME • Support of local industry should include suppliers

  16. 2. Universities • Almost as important as the business partners, but in a different way • Science-based industry • Basic technology (inventions or knowledge) • Regional partners are important • Creation of new firms (USOs) • Cooperation opportunities for established firms • Tacit knowledge need for proximity • Natural for USOs, but important to broaden the interface • The Oulo case: tight U-I networking strong cluster

  17. 3. Other biomedical firms Relatively little collaboration between biomedical firms in the region Specialisation in different technology/product areas One exception: biomaterials and cell therapy cluster

  18. Concluding remark Yes, regional collaborations matter in biomedicine – to some extent The role of regional universities Esp. for SMEs Business partners: regional collaboration is less important

  19. Biomedical industry • Broad definition • Firms involved in development, manufacturing and/or marketing of: • Pharmaceuticals • Medical devices (incl. aids for disabled) • ”Biotech supply” products • Clinical/contract research services

  20. Biomedical industry in Western Sweden More than 200 biomedical firms Six large firms: one pharma five medtech Three sub-sectors: Pharma: one giant; few others Medtech: many companies (large – small) fragmented cluster in biomaterials (+ cell therapy) ”Biotech supply”: no large companies some small companies

  21. R&D and innovation activities R&D expenditures: Spend more than 10% on R&D: 60% of the firms Spend more than 20% on R&D: 38% of the firms (75% spend less than 10 man-years) Mainly product development 95% of the firms Scientific work: 60% of the firms Radical innovations: 80% Incremental innovations: 80% 75% run 1-3 projects

  22. Biomaterials and cell therapy cluster

More Related