150 likes | 280 Views
HIV/AIDS COORDINATION AND FAITH BASED ORGANISATIONS: EXPERIENCES FROM UGANDA. JOHN RWOMUSHANA, MD, MSc Director, Research and Policy Development UGANDA AIDS COMMISSION ACET INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Entebbe –Uganda JAN 2005. CONTEXT AND RATIONALE.
E N D
HIV/AIDS COORDINATION AND FAITH BASED ORGANISATIONS:EXPERIENCES FROM UGANDA JOHN RWOMUSHANA, MD, MSc Director, Research and Policy Development UGANDA AIDS COMMISSION ACET INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Entebbe –Uganda JAN 2005
CONTEXT AND RATIONALE • Definition: Pooling efforts for a common goal • Purpose: Timely, efficient and equitable delivery of quality services • Imperative: Multi-sectoral approach, multiplicity • Structure and Location: UAC in the Presidency • Objective: To rally all sectors
DEVOLVING COORDINATION TASKS • Evolution of coordination: Devolution of tasks through Partnership alignment into Self-Coordinating Entities (SCEs) • Decentralization of Administration, programmes and support
UAC Mandate and role • Established by Statute of Parliament in 1992 to oversee, plan and coordinate the response to HIV/AIDS in Uganda; • Mandated to establish structures necessary to assist in the coordination function at various levels
Coordination functions • Defining and supporting development of policies • Promoting leadership initiatives and advocacy • Leading strategic planning, M&E • Developing, Partnerships • Managing strategic information and knowledge • Supporting and promoting research • Mobilising resources and overseeing utilisation
Uganda AIDS Partnership • Multi-sectoral coordination system • Supporting the coordination task of UAC • Rallies partners in all constituencies around common action • Support of strengthened coordination
The Uganda AIDS Partnership Uganda AIDS Commission & Secretariat THE HIV/AIDS PARTNERSHIP COMMITTEE Media AIDS PARTNERSHIP FORUM Uganda HIV/AIDS Partnership UGANDA AIDS COMMISSION
Uganda AIDS Partnership • Multi-sectoral coordination system supporting the coordination task of the Uganda AIDS Commission • Rallies partners of all constituencies around common action. • A Strategy in support of strengthened coordination
AIDS Partnership structures at national level • Self-Coordinating Entities: SCEs Actors of same constituency e.g. young people • Ensure input into Partnership Committee • Share experiences/set up peer support mechanisms • Facilitate joint AIDS actions and collaboration with other SCEs • AIDS Partnership Committee • Representatives of 12 SCEs meet monthly, chaired by UAC • Sets agenda for the update, implementation and monitoring of the NSF • AIDS Partnership Forum • All implementing and funding partners meet annually • Review progress and set priorities for next year • AIDS Partnership Fund:to cover coordination costs of Partnership
Strengths of the Partnership • Representatives selected, therefore accountable to their constituency • Stakeholders exchange ideas in democratic forum at same level as donors • Promotes transparency, consensus building, accountability, etc • Stakeholders take on responsibility to improve coordination • Beyond classic government/donor ‘partnerships”
Decentralized Coordination • District coordination policy guideline developed in 2002 • Provides for 2 arms ( Policy / Political and Technical) • Executive/ Political : thrust on Advocacy for attention to HIV/AIDS issues, policy guidance, community mobilization, strategic direction, partnership development & social mobilization • Technical : Planning, monitoring activities and resources, information sharing
SUCCESS FACTORS • Dialogue, open debate • Timely, accurate info. • Political involvement • Multisectorality • Flexible policies
OPPORTUNITIES • FBOs well placed for prevention, care, impact mitigation • Global and national political goodwill • Alignment around “3 Ones” principles
CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES • Pragmatism and tolerance • Further scale up • Constituency “self” coordination • Administrative decentralization • Resources: Effective utilization
Conclusion & Recommendations • No one partner alone can scale up effectively • No effective coordination without participatory, representative and accountable system • Tools for improved coordination under exist • Shared responsibility to promote and practice • Openness, respect and honest will for participation is key for Partnership • Continued guidance and support be ensured