1 / 8

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT: A TEACHING EXERCISE

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT: A TEACHING EXERCISE. Clark D. Cunningham, Director National Institute for Teaching Ethics and Professionalism (USA) and W. Lee Burge Professor of Law & Ethics Georgia State University cdcunningham@gsu.edu

connien
Download Presentation

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT: A TEACHING EXERCISE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT: A TEACHING EXERCISE Clark D. Cunningham, Director National Institute for Teaching Ethics and Professionalism (USA) and W. Lee Burge Professor of Law & EthicsGeorgia State University cdcunningham@gsu.edu Home Page: law.gsu.edu/ccunningham

  2. Teaching Exercise Developed By • Clark Cunningham • Emma Oettinger, Anti-Money Laundering Policy Officer, Law Society of England & Wales • Nigel Duncan, Professor of Legal Education, The City Law School, City University London • Produced with the assistance of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

  3. The Videos • Roles: • Nigel Grayson, Solicitor, partner in a small firm in Durham, played by Nigel Duncan • Emma Patrick, Client – Estate Agent in Durham, played by Emma Oettinger • When: Friday, October 28 at 2:30pm • Where: Solicitor’s office in Durham, England • Part 1 (2:41 minutes) • Part 2 (3:50 minutes) • Part 3 (5:14 minutes)

  4. Four Component Model of Morality (FCM) (Rest, 1983) Motivation & Identity Professional Misconduct Adapted from presentation by Dr.Muriel Bebeau to 2011 ABA Associate Deans Conference

  5. Four Component Model of Morality (FCM) (Rest, 1983) Motivation & Identity Effective Professional Conduct

  6. For more on the FCM • Cunningham & Alexander, Developing Professional Judgment: Law School Innovations in Response to the Carnegie Foundation's Critique of American Legal Education • in The Ethics Project in Legal Education(Eds. Michael Robertson, Francesca Bartlett, Kieran Tranter & Lillian Corbin) (London: Routledge-Cavendish 2010) • http://www.teachinglegalethics.org/content/developing-professional-judgment

  7. Cunningham, "Remediation Program for Dentists Provides Data on Moral Development Important to All Professions," 76 Journal of the American College of Dentists 50 (2009): http://www.teachinglegalethics.org/content/remediation-program-dentists Dentists referred for misconduct • 14 points lower than dental students on test of moral reasoning (FCM2) • When tested for understanding of “professional responsibilities of a dentist” (FCM3) • On a scale of 1-12, avg score of 3.8

  8. 1. Ethical Sensitivity 2. Moral Reasoning 3. Professional Identity 4. Effective Implementation Four Discussion Topics

More Related