1 / 7

Recall: sensitivity vs Higgs mass

Recall: sensitivity vs Higgs mass. 3 s significance. With 10 fb -1 we can have a 3 s significance for the discovery of the Higgs boson over the mass range between ~115 and ~600GeV. Some Stuff. My CSC DQM shifts are going Very Well  At P5, FED (DCC) errors continue

connor
Download Presentation

Recall: sensitivity vs Higgs mass

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recall: sensitivity vs Higgs mass 3s significance With 10 fb-1 we can have a 3s significance for the discovery of the Higgs boson over the mass range between ~115 and ~600GeV.

  2. Some Stuff My CSC DQM shifts are going Very Well  At P5, FED (DCC) errors continue Various versions of firmware, software UCLA strategy on HSCP Chris to push stau-type (charged in tracker) Greg to push neutral-in-tracker w/RPC trigger, dE/dX

  3. Other Items Look forward to about 4x luminosity this year “Adiabatic” changes to currents and emittance? Hold off on 25 ns running? Tracker systems and trigger may struggle but looks promising/okay CSCs will probably be okay, designed for 10^34 ME4/2 review last week Panels are a couple of months behind schedule ALCT electronics production needs to get going (see next slide) Other UCLA boards (TMB and RAT) can be delayed if necessary and/or desirable

  4. ALCT plan ($328K) • On-chamber 384-channel board • 72 boards needed, 29 spares but only ~15 working • Not enough for one endcap • Propose to repair what we can by ~Apr. 2012 (tight)… expedite making 80 new ones meanwhile • UCLA to do the job, as originally • FPGAs are still available • Not a full survey on the parts yet

  5. TMB plan ($90K) • 9U VME, 480-channel + ALCT input • Medium/high-complexity 9U VME board • A mezzanine card holds the large FPGA • Mezzanine boards can be harvested from ME1/1 • New base boards are needed • 73 existing spares, so not time-critical • Want 56 spares eventually, so will need to make 56 new base boards • UCLA to do the job, as originally • Not a full survey on the parts yet

  6. RAT plan ($40K) • Small VME transition board • 72 boards needed, 56 spares • Enough for one endcap • Propose to build 50 new ones • Match TMB spares • UCLA to do the job, as originally

  7. Timeline for production • Definitions: • T0==start final assly. ~Nov. 1, 2011 (4 mos.) • T1==starting assly. of 2ndendcap ~July 1, 2013 (24 mos.) • T2==3 mos. before running ~Oct. 1, 2014 (39 mos.) • Board schedules: • CFEB: T1 most relevant (DCFEB and ME1/1 board harvesting) • AFEB: produce boards by T1 • ALCT: fix or produce boards by T0+4 mos. • LVDB, LVMB: T1 most relevant (ME1/1 board harvest) • DMB: -not needed- • TMB: produce base boards by T2 • RAT: produce boards by T1

More Related