170 likes | 185 Views
TG EHIS 23-24 January 2012 Item 4.1 of the agenda EHIS wave 2 Implementing Regulation Bart De Norre, Eurostat. Overview. Introduction Content: context, principles Articles Reported derogations Time line. Introduction. Events and actions since last TG EHIS March 2011
E N D
TG EHIS 23-24 January 2012Item 4.1 of the agendaEHIS wave 2Implementing RegulationBart De Norre, Eurostat
Overview • Introduction • Content: context, principles • Articles • Reported derogations • Time line TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Introduction Events and actions since last TG EHIS March 2011 • Working Group Public Health Statistics June 2011 • Written consultation Round July-September 2011 • Core Group HIS September 2011 • End of ESS-net Public HealthCore Group and subcontractors • Assessment / lessons from EHIS wave 1 • Synthesis of quality reports, experienced problems, comparability question wording, comparison of indicator calculations • End of Grant “Improvement EHIS – Alcohol consumption, physical activity and mental health”: • RKI-DE, IPH-BE, NIHD - EE • implication of subject matter experts • Workshop, new instruments • Definition / priority EC policy services TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content • Implementing measure and act on derogations in accordance with: • Framework Regulation 1338/2008 – 16 December 2008 • ESS (European Statistical System) policy context • Modernisation of social statistics • New legislative policysunset clause all new regulations • Core social variables(set of standardised variables for all European Population Surveys) • ESS code of practice(relevance, accuracy, comparability, cost-effectiveness, burden, …) • Cost/benefit assessment for decision at ESS-Committee • extra benefits and burden for an IR on an European HIS wave 2 • Feedback missing (8 MS), conditional or unclear, important costs (but amount in € ?), other problems, hope on financing • Related documents: guidelines, data file technical specifications TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content - principles • Compromise national – European HIS • Only the common kernelMS can add optional questions/answer categories • Detailed definition of variables • Specifications on minimum requirements in sample, use of proxies, … • “Freedom” in data collection modes, detailed sample design (subsidiarity / proportionality principles)(balance of quality criteria and cost-effectiveness) TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content - principles • Improving comparability across MS through increased input harmonisation: • Tackle problems of different and/or badly translated questions • Enforce the use of standard questions • Use of a conceptual translation protocol • Provide additional guidelines for understanding - implementation • But other issues in comparability: • same reference year • field work period • impact of modes of data collection, proxy • Options: • Questionnaire as annex in the IR • Article with reference to the standard questionnaire and guidelines as a methodological manual outside the regulation TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content - principles • Questionnaire as annex of the IR • Most countries in favour for increasing comparabilityeven if other distortion factors on comparability remain • WG PH June 2011: DE?, FR, NL, PT, UK, and NO not in favour • DSS Sept 2011: DE?, NL, PT, FI, SE, UK not in favour • not in line with new legislation policyhigh risk of rejection at Eurostat Directors Board and ESS-C • more derogations to be expected • crystal clear legal wording on permitted adaptation of wording is not possible, so still a risk of comparability problems • complications for conceptual translation • not all national linguistic and cultural aspects can be worded in IR TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content - principles • Article with reference to the standard questionnaire and guidelines as a methodological manual outside the regulation • Preferred option in new legislative policyHigh chance of approval by Eurostat Directors Board / ESS-C • Common practice in other surveys: detailed definitions and reference to use a standard questionnaire / guidelines do not per se jeopardise comparability • More time and flexibility in conceptual translation and adaptation to national (linguistic and cultural) context TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content - principles • Non-compliance by some MS on some topics in IR:how to handle? • Derogations always of temporary nature, afterwards MS have to comply fully • Overrule by qualified majorityto avoid, especially indifficult timesnegotiated compromise is always better • Reduce content of the IR: • Smaller common EHIS kernel (content : variables - questions) • Less legal requirements (questionnaire outside the IR) • Finally, comparability in both options rely on trust and interest of all MS TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Content - articles • Content • Intro with “where as” clauses • 7 articles • Annex I variables • Annex II questions • Annex III excluded territories • Annex IV sample sizes TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Articles • Intro with where as clauses • Framework regulation – Annex I • Statistical confidentiality • Cost-benefit • ESS-C • Article 1: scope • Article 2: definitions • Correction in definition “proxy answer” TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Articles • Article 3: data required • Micro data – list of variables in Annex I • For HS, HC and HD collection according questionnaire: • in Annex II or • “article with reference to standard questionnaire…” • Nationally representative probability samples • Eventually add reference to guidelines on sampling design • Excluded territories – Annex III • Minimum effective sample size(see also document) TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Articles • Article 4: Reference period and population • Reference year 2014 • Reference population: individuals living in private households • Only one person per household • persons aged 15 + • Collection over the whole year or at least 3 months covering the autumn season • Proxy answers below 5% TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Articles • Article 5: Metadata • Quality related metadata - ESS standard • 2 months after micro data delivery • Article 6: provision • Exchange standard Eurostat – single entry point • 30 September 2015 • Article 7: entry in force TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Reported derogations • Reference year / collection period: • BE: 2013 • DE: Sept 2013 – June 2014 • ? FR: Feb 2014 – Jan 2015 • ? GR: Oct – Dec 2014 • SI: March – June 2014 • No answer: CY, FI, IE, IT, LU, • Sample sizes: • CZ, IT: perhaps ? • LU, MT: still too big ? TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Reported derogations • Delivery time: • ? AT, FR, GR, IT, LU, LV, PT: end of 2015 or unknown • Also related to national embargos; partial/final release • Delivery of variables / use of questions • All derogations have to be formally communicatedwith a justification (EU Member States)(other procedure for EFTA countries) TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012
Time line • Technical Group EHIS=> revised draft • Written consultationTG EHIS members and WG Public Health => February 2012 (10/02-03/03) • Agreement revised draft • Completion cost/benefit info • Formal request for derogations + justification • DSS (Directors Social Statistics)=> March 2012information • Eurostat Directors Meeting=> mid March 2012 • DSS (Directors Social Statistics)=> Written consultation March - April 2012 • Inter Service Consultation Commission Services=> April – May 2012 • ESSC (ESS Committee)=> September 2012 • Regulation to be adopted end of 2012 TG EHIS, 23-24 January 2012