290 likes | 424 Views
慈濟大學醫學資訊系演講簡報. 題目 運用叢集組合及分散法則於無線網路點遷移 拓樸之定型 (Cluster Association and Dissociation Method due to node migrations for Topology Dominating in Wireless Networks). Presented by Reu-Ching Chen. 2009/10/26. 個人簡歷.
E N D
慈濟大學醫學資訊系演講簡報 題目 運用叢集組合及分散法則於無線網路點遷移 拓樸之定型 (Cluster Association and Dissociation Method due to node migrations for Topology Dominating in Wireless Networks) Presented by Reu-Ching Chen 2009/10/26
個人簡歷 • 學歷: 逢甲大學資訊博士(95年畢業) • 經歷: 中華電信高級技術員(70/1~95/3) • 現職: 南開科技大學助理教授(95/8~迄今) • 證照: 高考及格 • 榮譽: 中央研究院 JISE 2007 Annual best paper award
可教授科目 • 1. 演算法, 計算機結構, 作業系統 • 2. 線性代數, 機率論, 隨機過程
Outline • 1. Introduction • 2. Model Description • 3. Mathematical Analysis • 4. Numerical Results and Discussions • 5. Conclusion
1.Introduction • Traditional organization on real-time communications Infrastructure-based ( which is fixed organization) • Modern organization Self-organized • Peer-to-peer communication will be unrealistic when the total number of communicating node become large
Conti. • Node partition method due to cluster association and dissociation will be useful for topology dominating. • Closed migration system(total number of nodes in the system N is fixed) is considered here. • Markov-chain(memory-less property) is adopted for the system topology dominating in our study.
2.Model Description • Continuous time Markov chain (CTMC) is used for analysis (Example: a two-state model is depicted as follows) State 0 State 1
Conti. • Where and are the transition probability for state 0 and 1, respectively • The system is assumed ergodic, I.e., for the existence of the steady state condition,we have
Conti.(Cluster organization) • Two clusters: cluster 1 and 2 contain five groups and three groups respectively Cluster 1 Cluster 2
Conti. • Therefore, in general, each group in cluster i contains i nodes Node 1 Node i
Conti. • The system includes finite number of clusters, where each group located in the same cluster owning the same number of nodes.
Conti. • Theoretically, since the system topology changes with time dynamically, then in a unit of time,any nodes of a group (belongs to a specific cluster) can dissociate and be combined with other nodes to constitute one group of a cluster.
Conti. • For convenience, the system state transitions are carried by the following migration rules. Rule1: U individuals of cluster 1 can associate to constitute a group of cluster U. Rule 2:one group of cluster U can only dissociate to constitute a U individuals of cluster 1.
Conti.(migration rule) M 1 1 N 1 M 1 N Cluster M Cluster 1 Cluster N
3. Mathematical analysis • The following notations are adopted for parametersLet N indicate the total number of nodes. Let indicate the total number of groups in cluster i then
Conti. • Letindicate the probability intensity that cluster 1 associates its U individuals to generate a group of cluster U • Letindicate the probability intensity that a group in cluster U disassociate into U individuals
Conti.(state transition diagram) • Let indicate the countable state space, and be the state, then the CTMC is as follows
Conti. • Where • Define the disassociate and associate operators as follows
Conti. • Then the transition rates between states are and
Conti. • We have the following theorem Theorem: if there exist a positive numbers denoted by satisfying the following relation then the solution for the N nodes system has the closed form.
Conti.(closed form solution) • I.e., • Proof > the proof is completed by conjunction of the above Equations and the balanced equation Where is the unique collection of positive numbers summing to unity, I.e.,
Conti. • Since the group number is a stochastic process with state space {1,2,…,k} that restart itself , then we can think the process is a regenerated counting process.
Conti. • Using the strong law,The A/D ratio is
Conti. • a more accurate estimation for system performance is obtained from the the dominating topology provided here. • The proposed method cab be easily implemented in any topology dominating. • Node association and disassociation can be generalized without constraint.
General case considerations State(2,2,1,0,…,0) State (5,2,0,…,0)) Only allow one association or disassociation occurring In an infinite small time unit
5. Conclusions • <1>A/D ration has an critical influence to the system topology dominating • <2>the clustering method is wide spread applicable to other systems for the topology validation. • <3>our contribution is focused on provide simple estimation for topology construction
Conti. • <4>future challenge (1): concentrating on searching more generic topology to achieve optimal performance. • <5>future challenge(2): extend the system of closed migration process to open migration process (allow node to enter or leave the as well as to move between clusters).