1 / 27

E-165 (FLASH) Experiment Status Report

E-165 (FLASH) Experiment Status Report. Johnny S.T. Ng SLAC EPAC Meeting, Nov. 15, 2003. SLAC E-165 Experiment. Fl uorescence from A ir in Sh owers (FLASH) J. Belz 1 , Z. Cao 2 , F.Y. Chang 4 , P. Chen 3* , C.C. Chen 4 , C.W. Chen 4 ,

corbin
Download Presentation

E-165 (FLASH) Experiment Status Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. E-165 (FLASH) ExperimentStatus Report Johnny S.T. Ng SLAC EPAC Meeting, Nov. 15, 2003

  2. SLAC E-165 Experiment Fluorescence from Air in Showers (FLASH) J. Belz1, Z. Cao2, F.Y. Chang4,P. Chen3*, C.C. Chen4, C.W. Chen4, C. Field3, P. Huentemeyer2, W-Y. P. Hwang4, R. Iverson3, C.C.H. Jui2, G.-L. Lin4, E.C. Loh2, K. Martens2, J.N. Matthews2, J.S.T. Ng3, A. Odian3, K. Reil3, J.D. Smith2, P. Sokolsky2*, R.W. Springer2, S.B. Thomas2, G.B. Thomson5, D. Walz3 1University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 3Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, CA 4Center for Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics (CosPA), Taiwan 5Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey * Collaboration Spokespersons

  3. Outline • Introduction: Motivation and Goals • Report on the Sep.2003 Run • Thin-target results • Spectrograph results • Plans and outlook • Thick-target stage

  4. Motivation • Recent observations of ultra-high energy cosmic ray events extend out to 1020 eV • However, there is apparent discrepancy between AGASA and HiRes > ~1019 eV

  5. Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays • Cosmic Rays have been observed with energies beyond 1020 eV • The flux(events per unit area per unit time) follows roughly apower law: ~E-3 • Changes of power-law index at “knee” and “ankle”. Onset of different origins/compositions? Where does the spectrum stop?

  6. Discrepancy Between Two UHECR Experiments AGASA HiRes

  7. Motivation (cont.) • Recent observations of ultra-high energy cosmic ray events extend out to 1020 eV • However, there is apparent discrepancy between AGASA and HiRes > ~1019 eV • Systematics in energy measurement being investigated by both experiments. • One possible contribution to the discrepancy is the air fluorescence yield.

  8. Current Understanding of the Air Fluorescence Spectrum • Bunner (1967), Kakimoto et al. (1995), Nagano et al. ( 2002) indicates ~15% systematic errors in overall yield and larger errors in individual spectral lines. • Ground based experiments – non-linear effects possible due to λ-4 dependence of atmospheric attenuation. • At 30 km, event energy can change by 25% if 390 nm line intensity changes by 40%.

  9. Experimental Program T-461 • The T-461 Test (June 2002) showed that we can measure the pressure dependence and fluorescence lifetime integrated over 300-400 nm with FFTB beams The E-165 program: • Spectrally resolved pressure and lifetime measurements • Energy dependence over realistic shower energies Thin target Thick target

  10. Objectives Of E-165 • Spectrally resolved measurement of fluorescence yield to better than 10%. • Study effects of atmospheric impurities. • Observe showering of electron pulses in air equivalent substance (Al2O3) with energy equivalents around 1018 eV. • Investigate dependence on electron energy.

  11. Sep. 2003 Run: Thin Target • FFTB Beam: 28.5 GeV, 5E8 – 2E9 e/pulse • Main target vessel: • Dry air, N2, “SLAC Air”, 10-760 Torr • Narrow-band filters (10nm BW, 300-420 nm) • Calibrated HiRes PMTs • Spectrograph system • Dry air, N2, “SLAC Air”, 15-760 Torr • Hamamatsu linear-array MPMT’s • Grating spectrograph system: 6 nm and 4 nm per pixel

  12. Thin-Target Run: Main Vessel Layout Pressure vessel Pressure vessel e NB Filter wheel Filter wheel Calibration LED housing PMT e

  13. OTR Beam Spot Monitor 45-deg OTR foil Wonderful contribution from the CosPA (Taiwan) group e • Monitor beam spot size and position • Provide energy profile diagnostics as well

  14. E-165: Air Fluorescence Spectrum Preliminary • Narrow Band filters • Dry-Air • 750 Torr • Arbitrary normalization Bunner • N1A: Corrected for filter transmission and quantum efficiency

  15. Air Fluorescence vs. Pressure E-165 Preliminary

  16. Effects of Contaminants E-165 Preliminary • “SLAC Air”: H2O, and traces of CO2 and Ar • Possible slight difference, but within our present measurement accuracy.

  17. Beam-related Background Various measurements as cross-checks: “Black”-filter, “Blind”-PMT, and Ethylene (non-fluorescent) gas.

  18. Narrow-Band Data Analysis • Data have been corrected for • Filter transmission efficiency • PMT Quantum efficiency • Background contribution • Further systematic issues (some examples): • Absolute calibration: PMT + Mirror + Filter • Absolute calibration of low-current toroid • Stability (gain variation over time, etc.) • Uncertainty in background subtraction • Detector acceptance (ray-tracing + modeling)

  19. Grating Spectrograph e Light pipe and mirror Grating Spectrograph

  20. Spectrograph Measurement: Air E-165 Preliminary!

  21. Spectrograph: Fluorescence vs. Pressure At low pressure (<100 Torr): • Fluorescence mechanisms extremely complex! • Sensitive to non-linear effects. Above ~150 Torr (for HiRes,eg): • Small pressure variation • Allows altitude spectral correction E-165 Preliminary

  22. Spectrograph Data Analysis • Data have been corrected for: • PMT quantum efficiency vs wavelength • Anode - anode difference in response • Wavelength dependence of transmission to PMT • Spectral dispersion at the PMT face (measured using a mercury lamp with 4 useful lines.) • Further systematic issues (some examples): • Independently measure transmission and associated uncertainties. • Calibrate dispersion for the wider-range grating set-up • Quantify the non-linear effects seen at higher beam intensities and low pressures.

  23. Summary on Thin-Target Run • Over-all successful thin-target run • Measured spectrally resolved fluorescence for various pressures and gas mixtures • Took reference data at low beam charge (1E7 e/pulse) for the thick-target stage • Beam-related background (most likely soft photons from shower) was a major problem • Detailed data analysis underway – plan to present results at the upcoming “International Workshop on Air Fluorescence – Air Light 03” in December 2003.

  24. The Next Step: Thick-Target • For a 1018 eV cosmic-ray proton, or a 30 GeV electron, the cascade consists of electrons with energies between 100 keV and a few GeV at shower-max. • Pass electron beam through varying amounts of approx. air equivalent showering material (Al2O3). • Measure light yield as a function of depth in the shower • Is fluorescence proportional todE/dx? • What are the contributions of low-energy (<1 MeV)electrons? • Can existing shower models(EGS, GEANT, CORSIKA)correctly predict fluorescence light?

  25. Thick Target Requirements • Low beam intensity ~ 107 e/pulse • Beam monitor and control • Showering beam spreads out at target exit – Careful calculation/measurement of optical acceptance necessary. • Need shower profile measurements to constraint Monte Carlo simulations • Beam-related background issue • Beam test scheduled for Jan. 5-7, 2004 to optimize layout and shielding

  26. Thick Target Setup • Design to be finalized pending beam test and further simulation studies.

  27. Summary • E-165 is an experiment with the aim to contribute and support astrophysics investigations using high energy beams. • We’re making good progress thanks to the strong support from SLAC.

More Related