1 / 15

Lecture 11

Lecture 11. Today: 4.2 Next day: 4.3-4.6. Analysis of Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs. For cost reasons, 2 k factorial experiments are frequently unreplicated Can assess significance of the factorial effects using a normal or half-normal probability plot

corina
Download Presentation

Lecture 11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 11 • Today: 4.2 • Next day: 4.3-4.6

  2. Analysis of Unreplicated 2k Factorial Designs • For cost reasons, 2k factorial experiments are frequently unreplicated • Can assess significance of the factorial effects using a normal or half-normal probability plot • May prefer a formal significance test procedure • Cannot use an F-test or t-test because there are no degrees of freedom for error

  3. Lenth’s Method • Situation: • have performed an unreplicated 2k factorial experiment • have 2k-1 factorial effects • want to see which effects are significantly different from 0 • If none of the effects is important of the factorial effects is an independent realization of a N( , ) • Can use this fact to develop an estimator of the effect variance based on the median of the absolute effects

  4. Lenth’s Method • s0= • PSE= • tPSE,i=

  5. Example: Original Growth Layer Experiment • Effect Estimates and QQ-Plot:

  6. Lenth’s Method • s0= • PSE= • tPSE,i=

  7. Fractional Factorial Designs at 2-Levels • 2k factorial experiments can be very useful in exploring a relatively large number of factors in relatively few trials • When k is large, the number of trials is large • Suppose have enough resources to run only a fraction of the 2k unique treatments • Which sub-set of the 2k treatments should one choose?

  8. Example • Suppose have 5 factors, each at 2-levels, but only enough resources to run 16 trials • Can use a 16-run full factorial to design the experiment • Use the 16 unique treatments for 4 factors to set the levels of the first 4 factors (A-D) • Use an interaction column from the first 4 factors to set the levels of the 5th factor

  9. Example

  10. Fractional Factorial Designs at 2-Levels • Use a 2k-p fractional factorial design to explore k factors in 2k-p trials • In general, can construct a 2k-p fractional factorial design from the full factorial design with 2k-p trials • Set the levels of the first (k-p) factors similar to the full factorial design with 2k-p trials • Next, use the interaction columns between the first (k-p) factors to set levels of the remaining factors

  11. Fractional Factorial Designs at 2-Levels • Use a 2k-p fractional factorial design to explore k factors in 2k-p trials • In general, can construct a 2k-p fractional factorial design from the full factorial design with 2k-p trials • Set the levels of the first (k-p) factors similar to the full factorial design with 2k-p trials • Next, use the interaction columns between the first (k-p) factors to set levels of the remaining factors

  12. Example • Suppose have 7 factors, each at 2-levels, but only enough resources to run 16 trials • Can use a 16-run full factorial to design the experiment • Use the 16 unique treatments for 4 factors to set the levels of the first 4 factors (A-D) • Use interaction columns from the first 4 factors to set the levels of the remaining 3 factors

  13. Example • The 3 relations imply other relations • Defining contrast sub-group • Word-length pattern

  14. How can we compare designs? • Resolution • Minimum aberration

  15. Example • Suppose have 7 factors, each at 2-levels, but only enough resources to run 32 trials • Can use a 27-2 fractional factorial design • Which one is better? • D1: I=ABCDF=ABCEG=DEFG • D2: I=ABCF=ADEG=BCDEG

More Related