20 likes | 36 Views
Visit Below Link, To Download This Course:<br>https://www.coursetutor.us/product/devry-hrm-330-week-5-assignment-latest/<br>DeVry HRM 330 Week 5 Assignment Latest<br>MODULE 5: YOU DECIDE ACTIVITY<br>There is a written assignment due this weeku2014You Decide. You have three areas of focus for this assignment.<br>1.tAs an attorney for Bainbridge Borough, develop a case to support the councilu2019s rejection of Carol Fernu2019s unpaid maternity leave request.<br>
E N D
DeVry HRM 330 Week 5 Assignment Latest Visit Below Link, To Download This Course: https://www.coursetutor.us/product/devry-hrm-330-week-5-assignment- latest/ Or Email us on HELP@COURSETUTOR.US DeVry HRM 330 Week 5 Assignment Latest MODULE 5: YOU DECIDE ACTIVITY There is a written assignment due this week—You Decide. You have three areas of focus for this assignment. 1. As an attorney for Bainbridge Borough, develop a case to support the council’s rejection of Carol Fern’s unpaid maternity leave request. 2. As an attorney for AFSCME Local 10, develop an argument to support your client’s contention that the council’s rejection of Carol’s unpaid maternity leave request violated the collective bargaining agreement. 3. As an arbitrator, how would you rule? Why? Write a two- to three-page paper, (double-spaced, 12 point type, APA style) that outlines the case for Bainbridge Borough, the case for AFSCME Local 10, and how you would rule as an arbitrator based on the facts you have for this case. Submit your assignment. RUBRIC HRM 330 You Decide Rubric
HRM 330 You Decide Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBainbridge Rejection Based on the collective bargaining agreement wording, defend why Carol’s request should be denied. 40.0 pts Full Marks 32.0 pts Mid Marks 24.0 pts Low Marks 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnion’s Contention Based on the collective bargaining agreement, defend why Carol’s request should be granted. 40.0 pts Full Marks 32.0 pts Mid Marks 24.0 pts Low Marks 40.0 pts 60.0 pts Full Marks 48.0 pts Mid Marks 36.0 pts Low Marks This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArbitrator’s Perspective Present the issues that the arbitrator has to analyze in making a decision on the grievance. 60.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion You have thoroughly presented both sides of the argument and have shown the arbitrator’s rationale in the decision to sustain or deny the grievance. 10.0 pts Full Marks 8.0 pts Medium Quality 6.0 pts Low Quality 10.0 pts Total Points: 150.0 Download File Now