570 likes | 802 Views
Web Services Technologies. Jacek Kopeck ý. Overview. Introduction to Web Service technologies SOAP WSDL Further selected specfications. About Me. If I seem dry, now you'll know why Worked at Web Services Platform company Got involved in W3C SOAP 1.2 WSDL 2.0 Moved to STI Innsbruck
E N D
Web Services Technologies Jacek Kopecký
Overview • Introduction to Web Service technologies • SOAP • WSDL • Further selected specfications
About Me • If I seem dry, now you'll know why • Worked at Web Services Platform company • Got involved in W3C • SOAP 1.2 • WSDL 2.0 • Moved to STI Innsbruck • Working on connecting the lower layers to semantics
SOA Recap (in my words) • Service-oriented architecture • For large-scale distributed computing • Coarse-grained service interfaces • Evolvability, manageability • Interoperability within and among enterprises • Inspired by the goals of CORBA and such
Web Services: Main Points • Technology for SOA • Client-server messaging approach • With predefined Message exchange patterns • Independent of network protocols • Application-specific interfaces • Similar to Remote Procedure Calls – RPC • Contrasted to REST and the Web • Most data in XML • Descriptions in XML Schema
RPC vs. Web Services • RPC aims to hide the network • Distributed system looks like a local system • Some calls happen to go over the network • But network is important • Latency, bandwidth • Reliability – connection, nodes • RPC is harmful • Web Services keep the network in mind
Web Services Basics registry discover services publish descriptions client service (provider) invoke
Web Services Basics • SOAP • An XML messaging protocol • WSDL + XML Schema • An XML interface definition language • UDDI • A business-oriented service registry
More WS Specifications • Modular approach to adding features: • Attachments • Addressing, Policy • … many others • W3C, OASIS, WS-I • Plus ad-hoc industry alliances
SOAP in Detail: Overview • née Simple Object Access Protocol • In fact, simple messaging protocol • Current version: 1.2 @ W3C • Message structure • Processing model • Protocol bindings
SOAP Messages • XML Envelope • Body • Application payload • Faults • Headers • Metadata, processing instructions • Possibly mandatory (mustUnderstand) • Possibly targeted at intermediaries
SOAP Message Example <soap:Envelope> <soap:Header> <wsa:MessageID> unique ID </wsa:MessageID> <wsa:ReplyTo> endpoint </wsa:ReplyTo> </soap:Header> <soap:Body> <bank:BalanceRequest> data </bank:BalanceRequest> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
SOAP Message Envelope Body Header
SOAP Processing Model • Processing a message • Selecting headers targeted at me • The current intermediary or ultimate receiver • Checking for understanding • Do I understand all that is targeted at me and marked as mustUnderstand? • Processing everything in some order
SOAP MustUnderstand • Mandatory headers • The receiver must understand them • Implies agreement to act in accordance • Non-mandatory headers can be ignored • This mechanism enables gracious evolution • If a new feature can be ignored, its introduction won't harm older nodes • If a new feature must be understood, its introduction will be discovered early by older nodes, without unexpected behavior
SOAP Protocol Bindings • Transporting the message over a network • Addressing • What an endpoint address looks like • Serialization • How to put the XML message in on-the-wire bits and bytes • Connection • How to send the bits to the endpoint
SOAP HTTP Binding • Addressing: URIs • Serialization: HTTP message body • Media type application/soap+xml • Connection: TCP • Possibly Web-friendly • SOAP 1.1 only used HTTP POST
SOAP MEPs • Message Exchange Patterns • Request-Response • Input message followed by output or fault • SOAP-Response • Request without SOAP (e.g. HTTP GET) • SOAP output or fault
SOAP Summary • Still pretty simple even if the name doesn’t say so any more • Extremely extensible • HTTP binding for easy communication • The value of SOAP: XML and Processing Model
Attachments • XML is nice, but… not binary • XOP: XML-binary Optimized Packaging • Binary data in XML logically in the tree • On serialization, it is outside, raw, efficient • MIME multipart message • MTOM: XOP for SOAP • Message Transfer Optimization Mechanism • Extends SOAP HTTP binding
WS-Addressing • Simple routing protocol • Endpoint References for addressing • With parameters or metadata • Message headers for routing & correlation
WSA Msg Info Headers • To – let the middleware deliver the message • From, ReplyTo, FaultTo – channels back • MessageID, RelatesTo – simple correlation • Action – semantics implied by the message <S:Header> <wsa:MessageID> unique ID </wsa:MessageID> <wsa:ReplyTo> endpoint </wsa:ReplyTo> <wsa:To> address </wsa:To> <wsa:Action> URI </wsa:Action> </S:Header>
WSDL in Detail: Overview • Web Service Description Language • Interface Definition Language (IDL) for Web Services • Current version: 2.0 @ W3C • Version 1.1 still in widespread use • Interface – reusable, abstract • Operations with MEPs • Binding – reusable, concrete • Service implements an interface • Endpoints use bindings
WSDL Component Structure service service service
WSDL Component Structure service service service endpoint endpoint
WSDL Component Structure interface interface interface service service service endpoint endpoint
WSDL Component Structure interface interface interface operation operation operation fault fault fault service service service endpoint endpoint
WSDL Component Structure interface interface interface operation operation operation fault fault fault binding interface interface service service service endpoint endpoint
WSDL Component Structure interface interface interface operation operation operation fault fault fault binding interface interface operation operation operation service service service fault fault fault endpoint endpoint
WSDL Component Structure interface operation operation operation fault fault fault
WSDL Component Structure interface operation operation operation message ref msg ref msg ref fault ref msg ref msg ref fault fault fault
WSDL Component Structure interface operation operation operation types message ref msg ref msg ref fault ref msg ref msg ref fault fault fault
types element declaration operation operation type definition fault fault WSDL Component Structure interface operation operation operation message ref msg ref msg ref fault ref msg ref msg ref fault fault fault
types element declaration operation operation type definition fault fault WSDL Component Structure interface operation operation operation message ref msg ref msg ref fault ref msg ref msg ref fault fault fault
WSDL Interface • Design of application interface • Possibly extending other interfaces • Operations • Message exchange pattern (MEP) • Input/output messages, faults • Referencing XML elements defined in types • Faults • Used and reused by operations
WSDL Interface Example <interface name=“Banking”> <operation name=“transfer” pattern=“http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out”> <input element=“Transfer”/> <output element=“Balance”/> <outfault ref=“InvalidBankAccount”/> <outfault ref=“InsufficientFunds”/> </operation> <operation name=“balance” safe=“true” pattern=“http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out”> <input element=“BalanceRequest”/> <output element=“Balance”/> <outfault ref=“InvalidBankAccount”/> </operation> <fault name=“InvalidBankAccount” element=“InvalidAccountInfo” /> <fault name=“InsufficientFunds” element=“InsufficentFundsInfo” /> </interface>
Invocation: In-only In-out Out-only Out-in Messaging: Robust in-only In-optional-out Robust out-only Out-optional-in WSDL Predefined MEPs core additional, not formal standard
WSDL Invocation MEPs • In-only: a single input message • No faults • In-out: a single input message, a single output message • A fault may replace output message • Out-only and Out-in mirror images of the above
WSDL Messaging MEPs • Robust in-only: a single input message • May trigger a fault • In-optional-out: a single input message, possibly an output message • Either message may trigger a fault • Robust out-only, Out-optional-in mirrored
WSDL Binding • Networking details necessary for accessing the service • Copies interface structure • SOAP and HTTP bindings provided
WSDL Bindings • SOAP binding: • XML message in SOAP envelope • Transport using a SOAP protocol binding (HTTP) • HTTP binding: • Web-friendly • XML message in payload, or as parameters in the URI
WSDL Service • A logical node of the application • One interface • Multiple alternate endpoints • Endpoints may have different bindings • E.g. SOAP over HTTP for a public endpoint, and SOAP over JMS for the intranet
WSDL Service Example <service name=“HypoTirol” interface=“Banking”> <endpoint name=“visible” binding=“HTTP” address=“http://ht.at/bankingSvc” /> <endpoint name=“tls” binding=“SecureHTTP” address=“https://ht.at/bankingSvc” /> </service>
WSDL Summary • Concrete service • Abstract and reusable Interface • Network binding • WSDL does not imply implementation • CORBA IDL requires objects • Exchange of XML business documents • Extensible in many ways
UDDI • Universal Description, Discovery and Integration • A Web service registry API specification • Business-oriented service publication, discovery (initially limited search capabilities) • Itself has Web service interface • Useful for intranet registries • A failed public service
UDDI Structure • Business entity • Organization information, contact • Business Service • A group of related services • Binding Template • Information on how to access the service • tModel (technical model) • Any kind of specification, e.g. WSDL • Also for classification, categorization
WS Policy • Non-functional metadata • Security, Quality of service, Privacy, Transactionality policies • Policy a set of alternatives (OR) • Auth tokens: Kerberos OR X509 • Alternative a set of assertions (AND) • Auth token AND secure channel • Assertions come from 3rd parties