1 / 4

IETF 84, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 1 st , 2012 Ari Keränen ari.keranen@ericsson

Update on Candidate Address Selection for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) draft-keranen-mmusic-ice-address-selection-01 A. Keränen, J. Arkko. IETF 84, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 1 st , 2012 Ari Keränen ari.keranen@ericsson.com. Background.

craig-howe
Download Presentation

IETF 84, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 1 st , 2012 Ari Keränen ari.keranen@ericsson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on Candidate Address Selection for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)draft-keranen-mmusic-ice-address-selection-01A. Keränen, J. Arkko IETF 84, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 1st, 2012 Ari Keränenari.keranen@ericsson.com

  2. Background • How different kind of (IPv6) candidates should be combined with ICE • Don’t use loopback addresses, deprecated IPv6 addresses, or IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses • Use revised RFC 3484 rules • Combine link-local/ULA only with link-local/ULA • Don’t combine local relayed with IPv4 private or IPv6 link-local/ULA addresses • Negotiation whether updated rules are used

  3. Updates since -00 • Prefer operating system preferences over the defaults (if available) • Never use loopback or deprecated addresses • Small clarifications

  4. Next steps • Something (still) missing? • WG adoption?

More Related