1 / 9

6 th Address Policy SIG Report

6 th Address Policy SIG Report. 2002.9.6 Takashi Arano Chair of APNIC Address Policy SIG Intec NetCore, Inc. History. 1 st SIG:Korea, Mar. 2000 2 nd SIG:Brisbane, Oct. 2000 3 rd SIG: KL, Mar. 2001 4 th SIG: Taipei, Aug. 2001 5 th SIG: Bangkok, Mar. 2002

craig
Download Presentation

6 th Address Policy SIG Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 6th Address Policy SIG Report 2002.9.6 Takashi Arano Chair of APNIC Address Policy SIG Intec NetCore, Inc.

  2. History • 1st SIG:Korea, Mar. 2000 • 2nd SIG:Brisbane, Oct. 2000 • 3rd SIG: KL, Mar. 2001 • 4th SIG: Taipei, Aug. 2001 • 5th SIG: Bangkok, Mar. 2002 • 6th SIG: Kita-Kyushu, Sep. 2002

  3. Overview • 11 presentations in 3 sessions • Long, tough but fruitful discussions reached several rough consensus.

  4. Consensus Reached • Critical infrastructure assignments • Consider as special? Need policy? (v4/v6) -- YES • Proposed criteria? • Root DNS • gTLD/ccTLD name servers • IXs • IANA/RIRs/NIRs • From which block?(v4) -- Swamp (202/7) • Assignment Size? (v6) • /32 for routable (DNSs and registries) • /48 for non-routable (IXs) • Technical considerations might be added later.

  5. Consensus Reached (II) • Revised AS number policy • The proposed amendment to let LIRs assign non-portable ASN to their customers was supported. • The final call for comments will be re-posted soon. • Experimental internet resource assignments • General idea was supported. • Secretariat to take steps to implement the proposal. • Internet Resources for documentation purposes • General idea proposed was supported. • Address block area should be discussed more

  6. Consensus (III) • IPv4 Allocations by LIRs to ISPs • General idea was supported. • Secretariat to implement the proposal • Needs additional support document to help LIRs to decide allocation sizes. • Some notes about NIR and LIR • Address space NIRs can allocate is portable, but what LIRs can do is non-portable • Only LIR customers can receive non-portable allocations.

  7. Other Informational Topics • 6bone Migration plans - a proposal • Update on opinions on RFC2050 in Japan  • Opinions will be fed back to 6bone community and 2050-wg, respectively. • Large Space IPv4 Trial Usage Program for Future IPv6 Deployment • Deployment Status of Wireless LAN Services • Tried Co-Chair Election, but no one applied. Continues to make efforts to find out.

  8. New systems successfully introduced • “Rapporteur” works well to help people understand • 2 projectors desired • Language translation service stimulates discussion • More evaluation expected • Needs a lot of preparation in advance, including meeting with interpreters • Multi-lingual?

  9. Co-chairs?? • Will call for co-chairs again in ML. • Thank you for your cooperation!

More Related