PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH (PAR)

1. PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH (PAR)

2. PROBLEMS FORMULATION • HOW FAR THE DATA OF SOCIO ECONOMIC, CULTURAL, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ARE PREPARED IN THE VILLAGES WHICH COLLABORATE WITH PERHUTANI AND OTHER RELATED STAKEHOLDERS • HOW TO COMPILE THE BASELINE DATA OF SOCIO ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL WHICH COMBINED WITH THE FOREST PHYSICAL DATA • HOW FAR THE PLANNING OF PHBM’S ACTIVITIES ARE ADOPTED, ACCEPTED, AND IMPLEMENTED BY COLLABORATIVE MULTI STAKEHOLDERS MODEL • HOW TO CONDUCT THE STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS PROCESS IN PHBM PROGRAM • HOW TO CARRY OUT THE PROCESS OF LOCAL ORGANIZATION EMPOWERMENT, ITS ESTABLISHMENT, AND PHBM PLANNING ON COMMUNITY LEVEL • WHAT INSTITUTION MODEL ARE REQUIRED TO BE BUILT, DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED ON PHBM PROGRAM • IN WHICH WAYS LOCAL WORKSHOP TO BE IMPLEMENTED TO ORGANIZE AND SINERGIZE THE NEEDS OF LOCAL PEOPLE, STAKEHOLDERS, AND PERHUTANI

3. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH • TO PREPARE THE BASIC DATA RELATED TO VILLAGE SITUATION, IDENTIFY THE PARTICIPATS OF PHBM • TO DEVELOP THE PLANNING MODEL OF PHBM PROGRAM WHICH IS REFER TO THE PHBM’S PRINCIPLES, TO DEVELOP PROCESS AND PROCEDURE OF COLLABORATIVE PLANNING • TO EMPOWER LOCAL PEOPLE ORGANIZATION AND FIELD STAFF OF PERHUTANI • TO LOOK FOR INSTITUTIONAL MODEL OF PHBM PROGRAM WHICH IS SUITABLE FOR ALL STAKEHOLDERS • TO TRANSFORM PARTICIPATORY PROCESS AND PROCEDURE IN PHBM TO THE PERHUTANI’S FIELD STAFF

4. RESEARCH QUESTIONS • UNDER WHICH SITUATION THE COMMUNITY FOREST PLANNING WILL BE ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, AND IMPLEMENTED • HOW FAR THE PHBM PROGRAM WILL ENHANCE THE PEOPLE LIVELIHOOD, JOB OPPORTUNITY FOR LOCAL PEOPLE AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, AND FOREST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY • HOW DO WE FIND OUT THE TRANFORMATION PROCESS OF THIS PROGRAM INTO PERHUTANI’S STAFF • IN TERM OF POLICY MAKING PROCESS FOR THE BENEFIT SHARING MODEL, IS THAT POSSIBLE TO IMPROVE • IN CASE OF EQUITY AND JUSTICE WITHIN THE LOCAL ORGANIZATION, HOW DO THEY SHARE THE BENEFIT OF PHBM AMONG FARMERS AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

5. GENERAL RESEARCH METHOD • PARTICIAPTORY ACTION RESEARCH (PAR) • DEVELOP BASIC DATA ON SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL PERSPECTIVES • PERFOM COMMUNITY AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS PLANNING • IMPLEMETING OF THE STAKEHOLDERS PHBM PLANNING • MONITORING AND EVALUATION TO CHECK THE PROBLEMS OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING

6. PRINCIPLES OF PAR METHOD • AN APPROACH TO STRUCTURED LEARNING BY DOING • INVOLVE THE FOLLOWING STEPS OF ACTIVITIES : • REFLECTION : WHAT IS THE PROBLEM ? • PLANNING : WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THE PROBLEM ? • ACTION : TAKING STEPS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM • OBSERVATION : WHAT EFFECT DID THE ACTION HAVE ? • REFLECTION : WHAT NEXT STEPS ? THE GOAL IS TO EXPERIMENT WITH SOLUTION TO AGREED UPON PROBLEMS AND TO LEARN THROUGH A STRUCTURED, ITERATIVE PROCESS IN WAYS THAT CAN BE COMMUNICATED TO OTHERS

7. CYCLE PROCESS OF PAR ; Monitoring Future Monitoring Learning Learning New Action New Action Observation Present decision Decision Observation Intervention

8. RESEARCH METHOD OF PHBM • STAGE I : NEGOTIATION AND PLANNING • STAGE II: PARTICIPATION ACTION RESEARCH (DATA COLLECTING FROM VILLAGES AND OTHERS SOURCE) STAGE III : STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS • STAGE IV : COMMUNITY PLANNING SYNCHRONIZE: COMMUNITY AND PERHUTANI • STAGE V: IMPLEMENTATION OF PHBM BASED ON PLANNING • STAGE VI: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PHBM IMPLEMENTATION

9. STAGE I: NEGOTIATION AND WORK PLANNING • LITERATURE REVIEW • NEGOTIATION WITH PERHUTANI AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENT • PREPARING FOR RESEARCH TIM, RESEARCH LOCATION, DATA COLLECTION, MOU, AND SUPPORT FROM PERHUTANI, ETC.

10. STAGE II: PARTICIPATION ACTION RESEARCH (PAR) IMPLEMENTATION ON PHBM • SITE RESEARCH LOCATION : 2 FOREST DISTRICTS AND 4 VILLAGES • LOCAL PEOPLE AS CO-RESEACHER • LOCAL PEOPLE AND RESEARCH TIM PREPARING AND FORMULATING WORKING PLAN TOGATHER, CONSTRUCT KIND OF STRATEGIC QUESTION, SUCCESS INDICATORS, PROCEDURE AND MECHANISM PLANNING PROCESS • PARTICPATORY DATA COLLECTIONS: SOCIO-ECONOMICS , CULTURAL, INSTITUTION, STAKEHOLDERS NEEDS, AND FOREST RESOURCES RELATED TO THE PHBM • DATA COLLECTED TO BE DISCUSSED WITH LOCAL PEOPLE • FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION REGARDING TO THE DATA COLLECTED, TRAINING ASSESSMENT NEED

11. STAGE III: STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS AT LOCAL LEVEL • IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS RELATED TO THE PHBM AGENDA • IDENTIFY THE ROLE, TASK, AND RESPONSIBILITY OF STAKEHOLDERS • SCENARIO EXPECTED FOR PHBM’S DEVELOPMENT • PROPOSED CHANGE TO BE IMPLEMENTED BY PHBM SYSTEM

12. STAGE IV: COMMUNITY PLANNING SYNCHRONIZE • VILLAGE WORKSHOP ON COMMUNITY PLANNING BASED ON DATA WHICH HAS BEEN COLLECTED IN THE STAGE II • CHECK AND RE-CHECK DATA WITHIN THE PEOPLE, PERHUTANI, AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS • MATCHING AND SYNCHRONYZE COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PERHUTANI PLANNING SYSTEM

13. STAGE V : PHBM IMPLEMENTATION • SOCIAL AND TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION • IN SOME EXTEND THE NEW MODEL OF PHBM PLANNING CAN NOT BE IMPLEMENTED, WHY AND REASON • IN WHICH SITUATION THE NEW MODEL OF PHBM PLANNING CAN BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD

14. STAGE VI: MONITORING AND EVALUATION • EXPLANATION WHY AND HOW THE NEW MODEL OF PHBM PLANNING IS IMPLEMENTED OR IS NOT IMPLEMENTED • IS THERE DEBATE ON BENEFIT SHARING FOR WOOD OR OTHER FOREST PRODUCT FROM PHBM’S SCENARIO ? • DO THEY HAVE ANY SOLUTION TO GET MORE JUSTICE IN BENEFIT SHARING ? • DO THEY HAVE (PEOPLE, PERHUTANI, AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS) ANY PROPOSE PROGRAM TO IMPROVE PHBM ? • DEVELOPING A NEW AGREEMENT