1 / 74

What’s the Diel with this Signal?

What’s the Diel with this Signal?. Jason Albright Nathaniel Gustafson Michaeline Nelson Bianca Rodríguez-Cardona Chris Shughrue. Funded by NSF and DOD Award Number 1005175. Diel Fluctuations in stream height. Water Height (m). 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Days in July, 2010.

creola
Download Presentation

What’s the Diel with this Signal?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What’s the Diel with this Signal? Jason Albright Nathaniel Gustafson Michaeline Nelson Bianca Rodríguez-Cardona Chris Shughrue Funded by NSF and DOD Award Number 1005175

  2. Diel Fluctuations in stream height Water Height (m) 8 9 10 11 12 13 Days in July, 2010

  3. Which Areas Contribute?

  4. Evapotranspiration Solar Radiation Air Temp VPD Q Soil Moisture Sap Flow

  5. Volume from S.G. • Q = P – ET + ∆S

  6. Significance • Use discharge to approximate ET • Interesting eco-informatics question because looks at watershed as a complete system

  7. Eco-informatics conceptual model Observed Diel Empirical Model Analytical Model

  8. Questions • What factors are principally responsible for creating diel signals? • How are ET induced signals affected by base-flow levels and watershed characteristics? • Are diel fluctuations synchronized across a watershed? • Does channel morphology influence diel fluctuations? • What are the mechanisms for the influence of ET on diel fluctuations?

  9. Watershed 1 • 95.9ha area • Clear cut in the 60’s • Red Alder • Most steam reaches are alluvial deposits

  10. Watershed 2 • 60.3ha area • Old Growth • Western Hemlock and Douglas Fir • Channel mostly bedrock

  11. What factors are principally responsible for creating diel signals?

  12. What we have to work with • Abundant data available through HJ Andrews • Lots of collaboration, local knowledge • Personally ‘familiar’ with 2-3 watersheds

  13. Stream network length Air temp Dielstrength* slope Solar Radia’n soil type Data Snow-melt (mm/day) Evapo-Transpiration (mm/day) Effective Riparian area** WS Snow content WS ground-water content Process Temporal WS property Drainage parameters Measured Estimated Parameters *Diel Strength = amplitude of diel signal in cfs ** (Riparian) area contributing to diel signal, m2

  14. Diel signals

  15. Overview of a year

  16. Summertime ~.05cfs

  17. Temperature vs. Solar Radiation

  18. What we’re seeing • Diel signal ≈ Solar Radiation • Conditional: WS has enough ground-water

  19. Another fun metric

  20. Another fun metric

  21. Mack Creek WS1 http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3407/4617034064_e46e675a86.jpg

  22. Early summer signal?

  23. Discharge spike with that signal?

  24. Snowmelt!

  25. Temp helpful

  26. What we’re seeing • Diel signal ≈ Sol.Rad. via ET in summer • Conditional: WS has enough ground-water • Temperature -> Snowmelt signals in spring • IF snow is present and melting

  27. What we’re seeing • Diel signal ≈ Sol.Rad. via ET in summer • Conditional: WS has enough ground-water • Temperature -> Snowmelt signals in spring • IF snow is present and melting • Watersheds may have neither, one, or both

  28. Stream network length Air temp Dielstrength* slope Solar Radia’n soil type Data Snow-melt (mm/day) Evapo-Transpiration (mm/day) Effective Riparian area** WS Snow content WS ground-water content Process Temporal WS property Drainage parameters Measured Estimated Parameters *Diel Strength = amplitude of diel signal in cfs ** (Riparian) area contributing to diel signal, m2

  29. How are ET induced signals affected by base-flow levels and watershed characteristics?

  30. Watershed 1: July 1 -July 7, 2000 - 2009

  31. Watershed 1: 2009

  32. Watershed 10: 2009 Watershed 9: 2009

  33. How are ET induced signals affected by base-flow levels and watershed characteristics? • WS1, WS9, and WS10 show signals that correlate with air temperature, while WS2, WS3, WS6, WS7 and WS8 signals don’t correlate • WS1 phase shifts are correlated to precipitation and height of base flow. • WS1 time lags behave different from WS9 and WS10.

  34. Are diel fluctuations synchronized across a watershed?

  35. Cap. Rod graph

  36. 10 8 9 11 12 13 Days in July, 2010 Data provided by Tom Voltz

  37. Are diel fluctuations synchronized across a watershed? Yes: staff gage, capacitance rod, wells and stream in phase

  38. Does channel morphology influence diel fluctuations?

  39. Staff Gages in WS2

  40. Bedrock channel staff gage (July 14-15, 2010) Bedrock channel staff gage (July 7-8, 2010) 0.2- 0.3 cm Change in Stage Height=

  41. Alluvial channel staff gage (July 14-15, 2010) Alluvial channel staff gage (July 7-8, 2010) 0.6 - 3.5 cm Change in Stage Height=

  42. Does channel morphology influence diel fluctuations? Yes: signal in alluvial reaches is stronger than bedrock reaches

  43. What are the mechanisms for the influence of ET on diel fluctuations?

  44. A Mathematical Model for Stream Bank Outflow

More Related