1 / 21

Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst, J., Jaumann R.

Seismic network of landers on Mars: Proposed positioning of landing ellipses and evaluation of the encountered range of slopes. Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst, J., Jaumann R. Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin. desired configuration.

crescent
Download Presentation

Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst, J., Jaumann R.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seismic network of landers on Mars: Proposed positioning of landing ellipses and evaluation of the encountered range of slopes Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst, J., Jaumann R. Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin

  2. desired configuration • The optimal configuration is a triangle of 3 landers separated by 30 degs, with a fourth station at an antipodal location. The triangle ideally should enclose a seismically active region: the favoured options are Tharsis and Elysium

  3. constraints The proposed mission design for the former Netlander mission: • allows for a maximum spread of landing times of 2h 40 min, which means that the possible landing sites fall within two bands of around 40degs width in longitude: one for prograde and the other for retrograde entries. • The reachable latitude range is expected to be 34S-53N. • Constraints imposed by the parachute and airbag systems determine that the sites should be at an altitude of no more than the 0 m MOLA level. • For the Netlander design, the 3-sigma landing ellipse is of the order of 540x55 km. Varies somewhat depending on the site.  (cf. Gusev crater, the Spirit rover landing site, at 170 km across) • Ellipse semi-major axis orientated along entry trajectory (perpendicular to trace of reachable sites) • the local slope should be < 15° on 5m scale, and the area free of obvious hazards

  4. Amazonia network

  5. Ladon basin

  6. slope range MOLA – 500m baseline

  7. 3d view MOLA/Viking MDIM

  8. difficult sites – Lycus Sulci

  9. slope range

  10. altitude range MOLA

  11. 3d view

  12. alternative sites – Olympus south

  13. slope range

  14. altitude range

  15. 3d view

  16. Elysium network

  17. Tharsis network – T1 variant

  18. Amazonia variant – Olympus south

  19. Chryse network

  20. table of sites

  21. conclusion • 540x55km 3 landing ellipses can be optimally placed such that the 15º local slope constraint is violated with maximum 2.2% probability for the Amazonia network (at Ladon basin) • Amazonia network offers the safest sites with the current constraints • Elysium network has good possibilities, although the retrograde entries may be constrained to ~11ºN; Ladon basin would be a good antipode, if time constraint relaxed by 50% • proposed Tharsis variants require significant relaxation of the landing time constraint (300% for T1) • (note that Hellas ellipses are expected to be significantly larger, and the landing systems may need to operate differently) • There are several feasible Chryse network configurations in the north; other than Hellas, a site east of Dao Vallis might serve as the antipode • An Amazonia network with a site south of Olympus Mons appears to be an interesting variant • G. Michael acknowledges the European Community's Human Potential Programme under contract RTN2-2001-00414, MAGE.

More Related