110 likes | 255 Views
PermaSense III Sensor Networks in Extreme Environments. Jan Beutel , Stephan Gruber, Christian Tschudin, Lothar Thiele. Objectives. Establishing a highly reliable and dependable wireless infrastructure for sensor and actuator networks in extreme environmental conditions
E N D
PermaSense III Sensor Networks in Extreme Environments Jan Beutel, Stephan Gruber, Christian Tschudin, Lothar Thiele
Objectives • Establishing a highly reliable and dependable wireless infrastructure for sensor and actuator networks in extreme environmental conditions • Terrain movement, micro-seismics, temperature • Long periods of unsupervised operation • Limited power sources • Maximizing data yield • Combining sensor and actuator functionality • Paving the road for future applications in early warning
New Horizons • Multitude of (new) sensors • Precision movement detection • Resistivity tomography • Micro-seismic events • Imaging • Large variety of time scales • Real-time actuation and sensing for fast processes • Long term for slow processes • Remote locations • No possibility of physical repair/update • No infrastructure • Sensor node in a pocket
Understanding the local and global perspective Trift glacier, images courtesy of VAW, ETH Zurich
And when catastrophes happen Eiger east-face rockfall 2006, images courtesy of Arte Television
Tomorrow’s challenge – improving today’s practice • Seismic/resistivity tomography actuation andsensing
Current Status and State-of-the-Art • PermaSense in MICS phase 2 • Operational field sites since 07/2008 • 15 nodes, 150 uA power consumption, 2 min sampling rate • Constant rate, simple sensors, limited context • Sensor network research • Post “gold-rush” era • The field is consolidating • Foundations have been made • Early (mis)conceptions have been understood and are being revised • Sustainability and real technology transfer • Many open (hard) problems • Permafrost monitoring and modeling • Manual interaction in field studies, fragile measurement systems • Quality data (to connect field/lab/simulation) missing for harsh conditions
Comments from the proposal review • The proposal could be stronger with meaningful involvement of more theorists to pursue the research questions that arise in deployments. Practice Theory Shift focus? Grow the team? Diversify?
Scientific challenges – (MICS) theory collaborations • System design – architecture • Design of extremely reliable systems by constructive/compositional methods • Resource allocation and arbitration • Locality of processing, storage • Communication requirements • Efficient signal processing algorithms • Local processing to filter out interesting events • Remote triggering of sensors and actuators • Natural processes and hazards • New insight through better data • Automated analysis and alerting Thiele, Beutel, MatternObservability by Design Theory Collaborators M. Vetterli A. Geiger, Geodesy ETH Climate, geo-hazard, civil engineering
Impact of PermaSense • Scientific • Driver application for more theoretical oriented technology research • Technology showcase and catalyst for multidisciplinary work • New opportunities for environmental research, unprecedented data • Societal • Hot topic: Global warming, climate change, natural environment • Economic relevance: Natural hazard prevention, (re-)insurance business • Media attention • Joint geo-science publications [NICOP2008]
Cooperation • Close relation to • Swiss Experiment • Phase 3 proposals • Environmental Monitoring and SensorScope II • Eternal Sensor Data Store • Observability by Design • Based on proven cooperation between • University Zurich (Stephan Gruber) • University Basel (Christian Tschudin) • ETH Zurich (Jan Beutel, Lothar Thiele) • Continuing to leverage MICS developed technology • Co-funding and close collaboration with the Federal Office of the Environment (FOEN)