1 / 16

Critical Scaling at the Jamming Transition

Critical Scaling at the Jamming Transition. Peter Olsson , Umeå University Stephen Teitel , University of Rochester Supported by : US Department of Energy Swedish High Performance Computing Center North. outline. • introduction - jamming phase diagram

csteele
Download Presentation

Critical Scaling at the Jamming Transition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Critical Scaling at the Jamming Transition Peter Olsson, Umeå University Stephen Teitel, University of Rochester Supported by: US Department of Energy Swedish High Performance Computing Center North

  2. outline • introduction - jamming phase diagram • our model for a granular material • simulations in 2D at T= 0 • scaling collapse for shear viscosity • dynamic correlation length • conclusions

  3. flowing ➝ rigid but disordered granular materials large grains ⇒ T= 0 upon increasing the volume density of particles above a critical value the sudden appearance of a finite shear stiffness signals a transition from a flowing state to a rigid but disordered state - this is the jamming transition “point J” sheared foamspolydisperse densely packed gas bubbles upon decreasing the applied shear stress below a critical yield stress, the foam ceases to flow and behaves like an elastic solid structural glass upon decreasing the temperature, the viscosity of a liquid grows rapidly and the liquid freezes into a disordered rigid solid animations from Leiden granular group website

  4. T glass  jamming J 1/ surface below which states are jammed conjecture by Liu and Nagel (Nature 1998) jamming “point J” is a special critical point in a larger phase diagram with the three axes:  volume density T temperature  applied shear stress (nonequilibrium axis) understanding T = 0 jamming at “point J” in granular materials may have implications for understanding the structural glass transition at finite T here we consider the  plane at T = 0 in 2D

  5. ⇒ shear flow in fluid state shear stress  velocity gradient shear viscosity below jamming above jamming shear viscosity of a flowing granular material if jamming is like a critical point we expect

  6. for N disks in area LxLy the volume density is non-overlapping ⇒ non-interacting overlapping ⇒ harmonic repulsion r (Durian, PRL 1995 (foams); O’Hern, Silbert, Liu, Nagel, PRE 2003) model granular material bidisperse mixture of soft disks in two dimensionsat T = 0 equal numbers of disks with diameters d1 = 1, d2 = 1.4 interaction V(r)(frictionless)

  7. Lees-Edwards boundary conditions create a uniform shear strain  Ly Ly Lx diffusively moving particles (particles in a viscous liquid) interactions strain rate strain  driven by uniform applied shear stress  dynamics

  8. simulation parameters Lx = Ly N = 1024 for < 0.844 N = 2048 for ≥ 0.844 t ~ 1/N, integrate with Heun’s method (ttotal) ~ 10, ranging from 1 to 200 depending onNand finite size effects negligible (can’t get too close to c) animation at: = 0.830  0.838 c ≃ 0.8415 = 10-5

  9. results for small = 10-5(represents  → 0 limit, “point J”) as N increases, -1() vanishes continuously at c≃ 0.8415 smaller systems jam below c

  10. c c results for finite shear stress 

  11. J  c Scaling hypothesis (in analogy to 2nd order equilibrium phase transitions): if we rescale lengths by a factor b,  will scale with  and  according to choose length rescaling factor crossover scaling function crossover scaling variable crossover scaling exponent  scaling about “point J” for finite shear stress  scaling variables  and 

  12. scaling collapse of viscosity  stress  is a relevant variable point J is a true 2nd order critical point unclear if jamming remains at finite 

  13. transverse velocity correlation function (average shear flow along x)   distance to minimum gives correlation length  correlation length regions separated by  are anti-correlated motion is by rotation of regions of size 

  14. scaling collapse of correlation length   diverges at point J

  15. ' flowing shear stress  ' jammed  cz c 0 c volume density  “point J” phase diagram in  plane

  16. conclusions • point J is a true 2nd order critical point • correlation length diverges at point J • critical scaling extends to non-equilibrium driven steady states at finite shear stress   in agreement with proposal by Liu and Nagel • shear stress  is a relevant variable that changes the critical behavior at point J • jamming transition at finite  remains to be clarified • finite temperature?

More Related