Clara H. Mulder University of Amsterdam / AMIDSt

1. The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research Clara H. Mulder University of Amsterdam / AMIDSt

2. Aim Presenting a research agenda Includes a concrete five-year programme carried out together with Francesca Michielin, Annika Smits, Aslan Zorlu and Marjolein Blaauboer Funding: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)

3. Definitions Migration: Long-distance changes of residence involving a change in daily activity space (internal; international)

4. Definitions Residential choice: ‘Choice’ of (or: behaviour with respect to) location and housing quality (including housing tenure)

5. Definitions Family context: Relations with family, both inside and outside the household (residential locations / geographical distance, contact, support)

6. Aim of the research Investigating the influence of the family context on migration and residential choice of households and the feedback of these choices to (ethnic) segregation

7. Why important in western countries Family still paramount Inter-generational transfers (increase?) Non-western immigrants Growing fluidity of nuclear families and households

8. Why neglected so far First things first: other innovations in migration / residential choice research Life-course approach, hazard analysis Family migration (focus: nuclear family) Inclusion of the macro context Data requirements are huge

9. Research challenges Family context and housing quality Family context and residential location Family attitudes and residential location Family context and segregation

10. Family context and housing quality Previous research: inter-generational transmission of home-ownership New: extension to: What are the mechanisms Does home-ownership run in families Does housing quality run in families

11. Family context and residential location Previous research: scarce; some British and North American work on (changes in) distances between parents and children New: extension to: Children moving towards parents Other family members; family networks Role of the family in residential inertia

12. Family attitudes and residential location Previous research: location & attitudes towards (nuclear) family versus work New: extension to: Longitudinal approach (what comes first) Location/relocation & attitudes/norms towards family

13. Family context and segregation Previous research: role of co-ethnics in location choice of immigrants upon arrival New: extension to: Role of family in … (see above) Role of family in subsequent relocations Feedback to segregation

14. Theory The family as a keep factor / trigger for moving Family solidarity (obligation; actual support) Location-specific capital

15. Theory The family as a source of resources Inter-generational transfers Transmission of socioeconomic status

16. Theory The family as a socialization agent Preference for at least the same quality of life (compare Easterlin) Familiarity with location / type of location Deliberate propagation by parents (e.g. of homeownership)

17. Theory Proximity to family as a by-product Housing careers start from parental home Inertia / principle of least effort; moves tend to be short-distance Determinants of migration are also determinants of long distance Degree of urbanization: city dwellers are more likely to have moved

18. Data requirements Data should: - Include locations (not just distance!) and relocations of family members plus background characteristics Include as many observations as possible (rare events; family context = just one determinant among many, among which some are likely more important) Preferably be longitudinal

19. Data availability Sample surveys: - France: Enquete Biographies et Entourage (Event Histories and Contact Circle) Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (Wave 1 available; Wave 2 to be collected from September 2006)

20. Data availability Register data: Sweden, Denmark, Norway (on-site analysis of whole population possible) Finland (off-site analysis of 10% sample) Netherlands: Social-Statistical Database (on-site, whole population). Brand-new! Parent-child links are now available

21. Results Mainly: ???

22. Results Inter-generational transmission of home-ownership: as much caused by similarity in housing-market characteristics as by direct transfers (NKPS; Helderman & Mulder, forthcoming in Urban Studies)

23. Results Distance to family members associated with level of education (+), age (+), degree of urbanization (+), being foreign born (-, at least within the Netherlands) (NKPS; Mulder & Kalmijn)

24. Results … and also with being an only child (-), siblings close to parents (-), having left home early (+), early labour market entry (-), early home-ownership (-), gifts from parents (-) (NKPS; Michielin & Mulder, in progress)

25. Results Older people do seem to move towards their children, particularly if they have grandchildren (not so much if they are older; living alone; have health problems) (NKPS; Van Diepen & Mulder, submitted to Tijdschrift voor Sociologie)

26. Results Younger and middle aged: no significant difference between moving away and moving towards family… Possibly sample size problem (NKPS). To be continued with Social Statistical Database (Michielin)

27. Conclusion

28. Conclusion More work to be done…