And Chuck Grantham Presents…

1. And Chuck Grantham Presents…

2. Economic Benefits of Using Products Containing SumaGrow

3. Improving Your Bottom Line Naturally • Reduced Inputs • Increased Yields • Higher Nutritional Value • Improved Water Efficiency • Less Plant Stress • Improved Soil Health

4. Corn - Arkansas • There was a $45.00 per acre increase in cost where the SumaGrow formulation was applied. All other costs were the same. • There was a 17 bushel per acre increase where SG was applied. • At $8.00 per bushel, the 17 bushel increase equates to a $91.00 increase($136.00 - $45.00) in profit for the SumaGrow treated fields

5. Cotton – North Carolina • The cost for each treatment was the same • The SG treated area yielded 163.9 lb/Ac more • At $1.00 per pound, this 163.9 lb increase means a $163.90 increase per acrein profits.

6. Cotton – China • The SG treated areas saw a 162.75 lb/Ac increaseover the control. At $1.50 per pound, this equates to an increase in profits of $200.00 per acre including the cost of SG application.

7. Forage (Fescue & Clover) – Virginia • The SG treatment had a cost of $45 per acre • The 100% NPK treatment had a cost of $83 per acre • The SG treatment yielded an increase of 750 pounds per acre at $38.00 less cost per acre. This equates to anincreased profit of $78.00 per acreover the fertilizer treated areas.

8. Watermelon – Arkansas Treatment 1 • Initial application of ½ gallon per acre of SumaGrow plus 90N, 46P, and 74K • Second application of ½ gallon per acre of SumaGrow at fruit set (SGF) Treatment 2 • Initial application of 138N, 46P, and 74K (F) Both treatments were 20 acre plots

9. Watermelon – Arkansas a,b Within a column, means without a common superscript differ (p<0.05)

10. BMR Sorghum - Kentucky Treatment 1: Nitrogen, in the form of Ammonium Nitrate (NH4NO3) was applied at the rate of 60 units per application in three applications (May 21st, June 18th, and July 23rd, 2011). Treatment 2: 1 gallon per acre of SG in 2 applications (½ ga/ac on May 21st and ½ ga/ac on June 18th). (SG) Treatment 3: 2 ga/ac raw milk applied on may 21st, June 18th, and July 23rd. Treatment 4: A control with no applications of any kind All applications were made with a boom sprayer

11. BMR Sorghum - Kentucky a,b Within a column, means without a common superscript differ (p<0.05)

12. Common Bermuda, World Feeder Bermuda, and Crabgrass - Louisiana Treatment 1: • Initial application of ½ gallon per acre of SG in late May 2011 • Second application of ½ gallon per acre of SG approx. four weeks later Treatment 2: • Initial aplpication of ½ gallon per acre of SG made in late May 2011 plus • 275 lbs/ac 3-1-2 (33% NH4NO3 + 40%P + 60%K) split into two equal applications approximately 4 weeks apart (SGF) Treatment 3: • Initial treatment of 3-1-2 (33% NH4NO3 + 40%P + 60%K) in late May 2011 • Second treatment of 3-1-2 (33% NH4NO3 + 40%P + 60%K) approximately 4 weeks later for a total of 275 lba/ac

13. Common Bermuda, World Feeder Bermuda, and Crabgrass - Louisiana Soil NO3, Brix, FP, and TDN Measurements by Treatment DM Yields and Cost Advantage

14. Oats, Barley, Austrian Winter Pea - Montana Treatment 1: • ½ gallon per acre SG applied in Mid-May 2011 shortly after plant emergence Treatment 2: • 1 gallon per acre SG applied in Mid-May shortly after plant emergence Treatment 3: • 4 gallons/acre Dramm Forage Boost + 1 gallon per acre SP1 (DFB) applied shortly after plant emergence

15. Oats, Barley, Austrian Winter Pea - Montana a,b Within a column, means without a common superscript differ (p<0.05)

16. Thank You!