320 likes | 453 Views
Environment and Second Generation Biofuels. Theofanis .A. Gemtos, Spyros Fountas, Christos Cavalaris Laboratory of Farm Mechanisation, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, GREECE. Introduction.
E N D
Environment and Second Generation Biofuels Theofanis .A. Gemtos, Spyros Fountas, Christos Cavalaris Laboratory of Farm Mechanisation, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, GREECE
Introduction • Second generation biofuels (i.e bioethanol), but also biomass use for burning, are expected to use crop residues and whole crops. • The removal of all biomass can have several adverse effects to the soil and the ecosystem.
DIRECTIVE 2009/28/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 April 2009, Article 18 par. 3 requires that: • Any relevant information on measures taken for soil, water and air protection, the restoration of degraded land, the avoidance of excessive water consumption in areas where water is scarce to be declared for the biofuels produced
Objectives • The aim of the present paper is to make an account of the problems that whole plant use for second generation biofuels can cause to the soil and possible methods to alleviate them and secure the sustainability of the raw material production system. • In this paper the effects to the soil fertility will be presented.
Risks of soil degradation • A study funded by the European Commission on European soils revealed that six factors can be major threats (SOCO team): 1. Soil erosion by water and wind 2.Soil organic matter reduction 3. Soil biodiversity 4. Soil compaction 5. Soil pollution by heavy metals 6. Soil acidification
The first four factors will be affected by whole crop removal.
What second generation biofuels whole biomass use will cause It will cause: • The soil to remain bare for periods of the year enhancing erosion • The removal of all organic matter leading to reduction of soil organic matter • Soil compaction by the movement of heavy harvesting and transportation machinery • Reduce biodiversity
Soil erosion • Is defined as the removal of soil particles from higher to lower parts of the land through the action of water runoff or the wind. • The phenomenon is considered to start from the rain or irrigation water drops impact on bare soil. • This impact brakes the soil aggregates, producing small soil particles that are closing soil surface pores reducing water infiltration and are easily moved by water or wind
Soil organic matter • Is a basic factor of soil fertility as it binds the soil mineral aggregates increasing their stability, improves water holding and cation exchange capacity, when decay provides N to the plants, it contributes to better soil structure. • It is produced by the organic part of the plants. • Most stable organic matter is produced by the high lignin content of the roots, while the cellulosic material of the aerial part is easily decomposed.
Recent research proved that without the cellulosic material of the aerial part the root biomass cannot be decomposed by the soil microorganisms. • Therefore the whole biomass removal can affect also root biomass decomposition
Soil biodiversity • Huge amounts of microorganisms and upper animals are living in the soil. They are the living soil. • They are using biomass for their energy needs. • Removal of the biomass will reduce their feedstock and cause reduction of their numbers and activities. • Their activities in the soil are very important for soil fertility. • But also for soil structure. Especially worms can improve soil structure.
Soil Compaction • It is a destruction of soil structure due to the excess loads imposed by heavy machinery. • It causes reduction of soil porosity (reduced water infiltration, reduced drainage, reduced water holding capacity), increases the energy consumption for soil tillage, causes difficulties in plant emergence. • Biomass harvesting and heavy transportation vehicles, especially under wet soil conditions cause compaction.
How we can alleviate the problems • At the moment research suggests that we should act in four directions: • Introduce crop rotations and keep the soil covered all the year round with minimum periods where the soil remains bare • Use cover crops as green manure by leaving them on/or in the soil • Use reduced or no tillage • Use controlled traffic or new mechanisation systems with small size, light machinery.
Crop rotation • It is defined as the succession of crops in a cropping system. • Properly designed it can have crops following each other minimising the periods of bare soil. • The crops can be removed (totally or partially) • Some crops can be used as cover crops and as green manure to secure the requirements for cellulosic material to assist root decay and keep the soil covered for longer periods.
Combination of shallow and deep root plants can enhance soil exploitation • Perennial energy crops can offer the continuous soil cover, a good root system and reduced costs as the establishment cost will be spread in more than one year.
Cover crops • Any crop used to keep the soil covered by vegetation that can be incorporated in the soil is called cover crops • They are left on the soil for protection from erosion, they increase surface soil organic matter and aggregate stability and improve biodiversity. • They facilitate the root biomass decay
Reduced or no tillage • Conventional tillage uses plough for soil loosening . This inverts the soil surface layer burying all crop residues and leaving soil surface bare. • Conservation tillage is defined as the system that leaves at least 30% of the soil surface covered by crop residues • It can include a shallow tillage without soil inversion or no tillage
Reduced and mostly no till offer several advantages for the soil fertility and the sustainability of the agricultural systems.
Using the tool for estimation of soil C stocks associated with management changes of croplands based on IPCC default data developed by Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Institute for Environment and Sustainability (http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/) we had the following results: • For warm temperate dry zone of Greece (Eastern part), for high activity clay soils, long term cultivated transition from full tillage to No-till both with high inputs without manure the C stock changed from 33.3 Mg C/ha to 36.7 Mg C/ha. Change to reduced tillage the stock was 34.3 Mg C/ha.
The respective figures for warm temperate moist area (west of Greece) the respective changes were from 69.4 Mg C/ha to 80.4 Mg C/ha for No till and 75.6 for reduced tillage. • For Sandy soil the C stock with full tillage was estimated at 26.8 Mg C/ha and changed to 31.1 with no tillage and high inputs without manure.
According to ECAF, CA offers • provides similar or even higher yields through improvements in soil structure, organic matter and overall soil fertility; • lowering production costs through reduced inputs of energy, labour and machinery in the short and long term, and fertilizers, water and pesticides in the medium and long term, thus raising related productivity and efficiency • mitigating CO2 emissions through reduced fuel consumption and sequestration of atmospheric carbon into soil organic matter, and reducing N2O and NH4 emissions through reduced use of mineral nitrogen and improved soil drainage;
reducing runoff and erosion through better soil aggregate stability and improved water infiltration, and protective cover of the soil by crops and/or crop residues; • diminishing off-site damage of infra-structures and pollution of water bodies through less runoff with a much reduced sediment load; • maintaining in-field and off-site biodiversity through the absence of destructive soil disturbance, protective soil shelter and less off-site transport of contaminants; • maintaining the diversity of rural landscape through enhanced crop and species diversity and cover crops; • maintaining less favoured rural areas under production through adoption of economically and environmentally viable production methods.
Reducing compaction problems • Controlled traffic: Is proposed to reduce the problem by using machinery with wheels spacing at 3 m, all machinery working width multiples of 3 m. • Soil lanes at 3 m width will be used for the traffic. • This is feasible using the new RTK- GPS technology offering accuracy of 20 mm and the new guidance systems on tractors and machinery
Small size mechanisation system • The aim to reduce machinery operators costs leads to increases in the size of farm machinery. • Harvesting machinery of more than 20 t weight are used. • Soil compaction can affect soil layers deeper than the ploughing depth which remain for many years affecting yields.
New technology can develop autonomous tractors and machinery. In this case the operator costs are eliminated and so the need for new larger and heavier machinery. • The small size light tractors and machinery can work 24 hours per day doing the filed operations with minimum soil compaction. • A fleet of small size machinery can offer a new mechanisation system that minimises soil compaction and other filed operations to remove comaction.
Conclusions • Whole crop harvesting for second generation biofuels production can cause problems to the soil and threats the sustainability of the system. • New production systems have to be developed to reduce all negative effects. These systems have to use new crops rotations including perennial and cover crops , conservation tillage and controlled trafic.
Acknowlegments • This paper is part of the project “Friendly to the environment biomass production” funded by the GSRT of Greece.
biomass.agr.uth.gr • Thank you