90 likes | 226 Views
Assured Guaranty Presentation June 2013. Introduction. Assured Guaranty Ltd. (“AGL” and together with its subsidiaries “Assured Guaranty” or “the Company”) is the leading financial guaranty franchise
E N D
Assured Guaranty Presentation June 2013
Introduction • Assured Guaranty Ltd. (“AGL” and together with its subsidiaries “Assured Guaranty” or “the Company”) is the leading financial guaranty franchise • Publicly traded holding company (NYSE: AGO) with extensive quarterly financial disclosures providing transparency to all investors • More than a quarter-century of experience in financial guaranty market • We are the only long-standing financial guaranty company writing new business today • Strong capital base • Consolidated claims-paying resources of $12.0 billion as of March 31, 2013 • Consolidated investment portfolio of $10.9 billion as of March 31, 2013 • Committed to maintaining strong financial strength ratings from Moody’s and S&P • AA- rating with a Stable Outlook from Standard & Poor’s • We are focused on building demand for our guaranties in the market • Assured Guaranty insured 1,160 transactions in Full Year 2012 in the primary market, representing $13.2 billion in Par • Assured Guaranty insured 230 transactions in 2013 YTD (through 5/31) in the primary market, representing $2.7 billion in Par • Currently insure nearly 11,000 unique municipal credits and nearly $500mm of our insured bonds trade each day on average
Texas Activity • Assured wrapped $1.8 bn of Texas municipal bonds in 2012 across 287 transactions. • 23% of new issue transactions within the State of Texas, nearly 1 in 4, came with Assured’s insurance in 2012 • Assured’s activity within Texas in 2012 included more than 200 Municipal Utility District transactions for $1.1 bn of par. • These MUDs ranged in underlying rating from A+ to BBB-. • Estimated spread savings of 10-25 bps on “A” rated MUDs and 25-50 bps on “BBB” rated MUDs • Assured insures the bonds of 380 separate and distinct MUDs with par outstanding of approximately $4.28 billion.
Our Approach to Municipal Utility Districts • Our analysis of perspective municipal utility districts for bond insurance primarily focuses on credit factors within the following five areas: • Legal Structure • Debt Characteristics • Local Economic Profile • District Composition • Financial Strength
Legal Structure and Debt Profile • Bonds are voter approved and secured by district’s general obligation, unlimited tax pledge. • Necessary bonding approvals are in place from State agencies and local municipalities responsible for oversight. • Debt load should be affordable for tax base – debt / assessed value should be manageable. • Capital improvement plan and borrowing capacity are considered, and should remain commensurate with district needs. • Debt service tax rates typically remain below $1.50 per $100 of assessed value.
Local Economic Conditions Insured districts are often located within relatively healthy economic regions characterized by: • Ample nearby employment opportunities (i.e. Houston MSA). • A tax base that is capable of supporting local tax rates. • Tax collection rates are typically high. • Property tax rates that are competitive with neighboring communities. • Tax base continues to grow as a result of recent development as well as demand for district housing. • Low foreclosure rates.
District Composition • Insurable districts typically are fairly well developed. • There is substantial residential development, and growth in assessed valuation. • Residential development with owner occupied homes is preferred. • Given the need for substantial development and investment grade ratings, Assured is not typically involved in a district’s first bond financing, but rather subsequent financings as district becomes built out. • Depending upon status of district development, assessed values will be either stable or growing from additional development or demand. • District tax base should be relatively diverse, with little concentration to a limited number of leading taxpayers.
Financial Operations Analysis of the General Fund and Debt Service Fund is conducted for perspective districts to determine financial strength and dependability. • Typically like to see the last three to five years of audited financial statements. • Both the General Fund and the Debt Service Fund should consistently exhibit healthy reserve levels and liquidity (unrestricted cash on hand). • This provides for cushion against unexpected expenses. • Consistent trend of balanced operations or surpluses without reliance on developer contributions is viewed favorably. • Monthly water charges should be competitive with neighboring districts.
Conclusion • We are the only-long standing financial guaranty company continuing to insure bonds today. • We have insured municipal utility districts in Texas for close to 20 years, and insured more than 200 district transactions in 2012 alone. • Our experienced underwriting team understands the various nuances in analyzing municipal utility districts. • District credit factors are analyzed in their entirety. Deficiencies in one area may be offset by positive credit attributes in another area.