1 / 54

Date: 2012-01-19

TGad January 2012 Report. Date: 2012-01-19. Authors:. Meeting Protocol. Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot. January 2012. Attendance. https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index Register Indicate attendance

cyrah
Download Presentation

Date: 2012-01-19

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGad January2012 Report Date:2012-01-19 Authors: Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  2. Meeting Protocol • Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  3. January 2012 Attendance • https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index • Register • Indicate attendance See document 11-09-0517r0 for more details Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status • Make sure your badges are correct • If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising • Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area • see Adrian Stephens – adrian.p.stephens@intel.com • Cell Phones Silent or Off Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  5. Patent Policy • Following 5 slides Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  6. Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: • Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation • Advise the WG attendees that: • The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; • Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; • There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. • Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: • That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; • That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard • Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. • The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. • It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. (Optional to be shown) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  7. January 2012 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform • All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  8. January 2012 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Slide #2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  9. January 2012 Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: • Either speak up now or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or • Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  10. January 2012 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. • --------------------------------------------------------------- • See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  11. Call for secretary Set agenda for the week Review from November Approve minutes from November Review from initial sponsor ballot Review conference calls Approve minutes from conference calls Editor Report Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions Planning for March Other presentations January 2012 Agenda Items for the Week Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  12. Comment Resolution • 11-12/0020r2, Comment Database, Carlos Cordeiro • 11-12/0118r0, Chris Hansen January 2012 Submissions Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  13. January 2012 Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week • Monday Jan 16th, 10:30 – 12:30 • Call for secretary • Set agenda for the week • Review from November • Approve minutes from November • Review from initial sponsor ballot • Review conference calls • Approve minutes from conference calls • Editor Report • Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions • Tuesday Jan 17th, 8:00 – 10:00 • Starting ~8:45am (after UWB preso in WNG) • Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions • Tuesday Jan 17th, 10:30 – 12:30 • Ad hoc • Tuesday Jan 17th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Ad hoc • Wednesday Jan 18th, 13:30 – 15:30 • Comment resolution • Wednesday Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Dorothy’s comment • Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions • Thursday Jan 19th, 8:00 – 10:00 • Comment resolution • Thursday Jan 19th, 10:30 – 12:30 • Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions • Thursday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 • Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions • Planning for March Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  14. Call for secretary Set agenda for the week Review from November Approve minutes from November Review from initial sponsor ballot Review conference calls Approve minutes from conference calls Editor Report Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) & motions on resolutions January 2012 Monday Jan 16th, 10:30 – 12:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  15. Resolved all comments on LB 185 this week • TG and WG approved motion for recirculation letter ballot on D5.0, LB186 started on Nov 9 • TG and WG approved Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot • Proposal for working relationship with CWPAN, Bruce Kraemer, 11/1570 • 802.11 Study Group to establish a forum for developing the procedural framework, clarifying the technical goals, and developing a PAR and five criteria focused on CWPAN extensions to P802.11ad January 2012 Review from November Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  16. Motion to approve November ‘11 TGad minutes as contained in 11-11-1446r0 Move: Chris Second: James January 2012 November Minutes Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  17. Conference call minutes from 2011 contained in • 11/0016r24 • Dec 1, 2011 call • LB 186 results • 94.7 % yes; 5.3% no; 23 comments received • All comments resolved in 11/1603r2 with no modification to draft • Motion to approve TGad conference call minutes for Dec 1, 2011 as contained in 11-11-0016r24 • Move: Chris • Second: James January 2012 Review of Conference Calls (1/4) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  18. Conference call minutes from 2012 contained in • 12/0007r1 • Jan 5, 2012 call • TGad architecture discussion (12/0005) • architecture diagram to be added to draft • table to explaining RSNA source, destination to be added to draft Review of Conference Calls (2/4) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  19. Jan 12, 2012 call • Sponsor ballot opened Dec 6, 2011 and closed Jan 5, 2012 • 86% yes, 14% no; 515 total comments • comment database: 11-12/0020r0 • Comment resolution • Reviewed and approved 12/0023r2 on TSPEC data rates • Reviewed: 12/0047r0, Fixes and Clarifications; 12/0048r0, Wakeup Schedule Element; 12/0051r0, GCMP Test Vector Revised; 12/0022r0, MB and PCP selection fixes; will be motioned in Jacksonville • Reviewed 12/0021r0, MLME interface for BF; will have further discussion next conference call Review of Conference Calls (3/4) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  20. Motion to approve TGad conference call minutes as contained in 11-12-0007r1 Move: Chris Second: James Review of Conference Calls (4/4) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  21. January 2012 Editor Report Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  22. Move to approve resolution of comment 6001 in • 12/0047r1, Fixes and Clarifications • 12/0048r1, Wakeup Schedule Element • 12/0051r1, GCMP Test Vector Revised • 12/0022r0, MB and PCP selection fixes • No objection to resolutions during Thursday Jan 12th, 20:00-22:00 ET conference call • Move/Second: James/Chris January 2012 Motion #66 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  23. 12/0020r2 • Start Graham’s comments • CID 6126; no objection to resolution • 6011; no objection to resolution • 6010; discussion on PCP/AP as defined as PCP or AP; found a few misuses that need to be fixed • 6003 • Strawpoll: Change Dband to Vband (1-11) • Strawpoll: change Oband to non-Dband (4-10) • 6009 • Strawpoll: change name of Short AMSDU (5-9) • Strawpoll: include note describing removed fields (5-8) Notes for Monday Jan 16th, 10:30 – 12:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  24. New time slots for ad hoc meetings: • Tues 10:30-12:30, City Terrace 12 • Tues 16:00-18:00, City Terrace 12 • Comment resolution from initial sponsor ballot (on D5.0) • Comment resolution spreadsheet 11-12/0020 January 2012 Tuesday Jan 17th, 8:45 – 10:00 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  25. Continue Graham Smith’s comments in 11-12/0020r2 • CID 6007 • SP: P44L10/11, delete “is applicable to the Oband and Dband”? 3/1 • SP: P44L24, replace “is applicable only to the Oband” to “is not applicable to the Dband”? 3/0 • 6006 • Similar to 6003 • 6004 • Separately, define S-AP/S-PCP • 6127 • Page 428, Line 2 Notes for Tuesday Jan 17th, 8:45 – 10:00 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  26. 6128 • Discussed scheduling, power save • 6132 • Similar to 6128; resolution modified to remove reference to 6128, but copy resolution to 6128 into 6132 • 6130 • Discussing scheduling times, continue discussion in AM2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  27. 11-12/0020r2 • Continue discussion on CID 6130 • Commenter ok with use of Extended Dband TSPEC • 6129 • Commenter ok w/ resolution • 6131 • Commenter ok w/ resolution • Switch to Alex Ashley’s comments • 6081 • Refers to 6378, so do that first Tuesday Jan 17th, 10:30 – 12:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  28. 6378 • Added differences between AP and PCP to resolution • Comment ok w/ resolution • 6081 • Copy part of 6378 resolution • 6065 • Refers to 6364 • Do 6364 first • Commenter ok w/ resolution • 6065 • Commenter ok w/ resolution Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  29. 6083 • Whether to support GCR? • In Omni world: 3 or 4 STAs, could just use DMS; GCR is only useful for larger number of STAs • People have till next conference to think about whether or not to support GCR in Dband (or people can email their preference by that call) • Will strawpoll this on conference and either fix GCR as per CID 6083 or remove support • Eldad: send email to reflector on Monday announcing agenda topic for call Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  30. 6067 • Changed to revised and change acronym to SSW • 6373 (duplicate of 6067) • Changed to revised and change acronym to SSW • 6016 • First look at related comment 6264 • 6264 • Change name of MIB variable “…implemented”; change to capability; change to read-only • 6016, 6017, 6018, 6019, 6020, 6021, 6022, 6023, 6025, 6027, 6026, 6028, 6029, 6030, 6031 • Change name of MIB variable to “…implemented” Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  31. 6024 • Commenter ok w/ resolution • 6077, 6271 • Commenter ok w/ resolution • 6074, 6092, 6093, 6269 • Commenter ok w/ resolution Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  32. Continue w/ Alex Ashley’s comments in 11-12/0020r2 • 6091, comment accepted • 6095, 6512, comment accepted • 6097, comment accepted • 6098 • Modified resolution to add text to spec to clarity priority ordering • 6090, comment accepted • 6087, comment accepted • 6088, comment accepted • 6089, comment accepted • 6032, 6034, 6033, 6035, 6040, 6042, 6047, 6043, 6044, 6046, 6048, 6045, 6049 almost dup. of 6264 • 6036, 6037, add MIB element • 6038, 6039 no objection Tuesday Jan 17th, 16:00 – 18:00 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  33. 6105, 6396 • Modify field name • 6110, commenter ok/ resolution • 6041, accepted • 6112, modified resolution to deactivate mesh when 11ad, commenter ok/ resolution • Switch to David Hunter’s comments • 6376, convert Oband and Dband to adjectives • 6377, deferred until after 6007 and 6376 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  34. 6382, accepted 6380, accepted 6381, accepted 6385, duplicate of 6077 Will add Wed PM1 and Th AM1 if 11ac adjourns Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  35. Continue David Hunter’s comments in 11-12/0020r3 6388, accepted 6391, modified resolution w/ agreement from commenter 6393, 6080, 6273, modified sentence w/ agreement from commenters 6395, accepted 6398, accepted 6400, modified grammar of resolution w/ agreement from commenter 6399, accepted 6401, commenter ok with modified resolution 6402, modified sentence, no objection 6404, accepted 6406, accepted Notes for Wednesday Jan 18th, 13:30 – 15:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  36. 6408, commenter ok w/ resolution 6410, commenter ok w/ modified resolution 6415, accepted 6417, modified resolution to restructure and clarify sentence 6421, accepted Started 6426 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  37. Continued 6426, changed Dband technology to non-802.11 system CIDs on Oband and Dband terminology: 6445, 6328, 6327, 6495, 6489, 6483, 6332, 6331 Strawpoll: Do you support changing the term Dband? 10/0/7 MGR MGT DVHT DHT GHT Notes for Wednesday Jan 18th, 16:00 – 18:00 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  38. MGR – multi gigabit rate; 11 MGT – multi gigabit throughput; 10 DVHT – directional VHT; 4 DHT – directional HT; 3 GHT – gigabit HT; 3 MHT – millimeter HT; 6 DMG – directional multi gigabit; 11 MMW – milli-meter wave; 1 Strawpoll; vote for as many as one likes Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  39. Strawpoll: vote for one • MGR – multi gigabit rate; 7 • MGT – multi gigabit throughput; 0 • DMG – directional multi gigabit; 11 • Change Dband to DMG, defined above • No objection to changing Oband to non-DMG • Redid 6003, 6006, 6376, 6377 as above Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  40. 6427, copied last edit from 6426 6432, accepted with change to DMG 6433, similar to 6376 6434, accepted 6435, commenter ok w/ resolution Switch to Jon Rosdahl’s comments 6441 commenter ok w/ resolution 6312, duplicate of 6441 6446, accept Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  41. 12/0020r4 • Jens Tingleff’s comments • 6106, accepted • 6159 assigned to Payam • 6158, accepted • Back to Jon’s comments • 6438, added MIB variable • Erik comment’s • 6149, changed to revised, added informative sentence • Dorothy’s comments • 6488, looked at related CID 6380 and modified accordingly • 6487, accepted • 6486, refers to 6507 and modified accordingly • 6507, accepted Notes for Thursday Jan 19th, 8:00 – 10:00 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  42. 6484, accepted 6493, accepted 6485, accepted Switch to Stephen McCann’s comments 6114, 6291, no objections to resolution 6120, accepted 6119, accepted 6118, accepted 6122, accepted 6121, accepted 6123, accepted 6124, accepted Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  43. 6117, accepted 6116, revised to match the resolution in 6090 Switch to Mike Montemurro comment’s 6333, accepted 6334, accepted Switch to Tom Siep’s comments 6299, added more explanation 6298, copied resolution from 6438 Switch to Richard Edgar’s comments 6308, asked commenter to bring submission 6309, refer to 12/0005 and conference call minutes, continue next time slot Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  44. Continue 6309, refer to 12/0005 and conference call minutes 6310, no objection to resolution 6314, accepted 6321, 6322, 6326, 6152 assigned to Sai 6323,6151 TBR w/ other arch cids Switch to Jim Lansfords comments 6302, accepted Switch to “other ordering” 6161, accepted 6476, defer 6464, accept 6162, withdrawn by commenter (need to figure out how to “withdraw” in sponsor ballot) 6168, duplicate of 6364 Notes for Thursday Jan 19th, 10:30 – 12:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  45. 6307, discussion of term beacon interval wrt amount of time vs structure; • Rename fig 9-43 to “example of access periods within a BI”; pg270L27 change “a BI structure” to “access periods in a BI”; add BHI to figure • Rename title of 9.33.2 to “access periods within a beacon interval” • Delete 8.4.1.3 • Replace all instances of “BI” by “beacon interval” whenever it does not refer to the name of the field, and “BIs” by “beacon intervals” • Change BIH to BHI in acronym and definition and all occurrences • P166L4, change “BI header” to “BHI” Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  46. 6279, copied resolution from 6307 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  47. 6476 • Outcome of the proposed change • New subclause 3.3.1 with title of “abbreviations and acronyms specific to ” • Move all 11ad two letter acronyms to 3.3.1 • There is concern regarding used of the same acronym within the 802.11+amendments spec with different meanings, the preference would be to ensure uniqueness of each acronym. • Continue discussion after motion Notes for Thursday Jan 19th, 13:30 – 15:30 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  48. Proposed to reject • Obligation of each group task group to ensure there is no confusion in their definitions and acronyms, and CRC has done that • Start discussion on 6487 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  49. Move to approve resolution of comments 600360046007600960106011601660176018601960206021602260236024602560266027602860296030603160326033603460356036603760386039604060416042604360446045604660476048604960656067607460776080608160876088608960906091609260936095609760986105611061126114611661176118611961206121612261236124612661276128612961306131613261496158616062646269627162736291629862996308631263336334636463736377637863806381638263856388639163936395639663986399640064016402640464066408641064156417642164266427643264336434643564386441644664846485648664876488649365076512 in 11-12/0020r5 Move: alex/jon Motion passes by unanimous consent Motion #67 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  50. Move to approve resolution of comments 6489, 6445, 6328, 6327, 6006, 6495, 6483, 6332, 6331, 6376 in 11-12/0020r5 Move: Jon/chris 17-2-1 Motion passes Motion #68 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

More Related