410 likes | 496 Views
Reading company accounts. possibilities and limitations of public domain information sources. Public domain sources. information on individuals is scattered over several of these and within each source. Wealth and income differ. wealth is a ‘stock’ – a snapshot at a particular moment
E N D
Reading company accounts possibilities and limitations of public domain information sources
Public domain sources • information on individuals is scattered over several of these • and within each source
Wealth and income differ • wealth is a ‘stock’ – a snapshot at a particular moment • a ‘balance sheet’ item • total assets minus total liabilities = ‘net worth’ • income is a ‘flow’ over a given period, typically a year
‘Realisable’ wealth • most assets have to be sold to be ‘realised’ (turned into actual cash) • selling may be restricted (share ‘lock ins’, legal covenants, market conditions) • the easier and quicker an asset can be realised the more ‘liquid’ it is
Liquidity of wealth • high – cash deposits, easily marketable securities (government bonds, ‘blue chip’ shares) • medium (able to borrow against them) – real estate, insurance policies • low – infrequently traded securities (dot.com ‘millionaires’) • other categories shift (property, precious metals/stones, works of art) category according to economic conditions
British official wealth statistics • not current – based on estates of deceased admitted to probate in a given year • but worth noting wills are in the public domain • however, aggregate data is available in terms of asset values
thus some 45% of personal wealth is tied up in bricks and mortar • not easily fully ‘realisable’ – although can be borrowed against
Land Registries • official record of land ownership • www.landreg.gov.uk
What Land Registry records tell you • registered owners of a property or piece of land • (from 2000) price when last sold or estimated value if newly registered • name of lender if it is mortgaged
Title number: CS72510 This title is dealt with by Land Registry, Plymouth Office. This extract shows information current on [date and time] and so does not take account of any application made after that time even if pending in the Land Registry when this extract was issued. REGISTER EXTRACT Title Number : CS72510 Address of Property : 23 Cottage Lane, Kerwick, PL14 3JP. Price Paid/Value Stated : £128,000 Registered Owners : Peter Andrew Bartram and Susan Helen Bartram of : 23 Cottage Lane, Kerwick, (PL14 3JP). Lender : ILKINGHAM BUILDING SOCIETY The price paid/value stated information has been entered in the register since 1 April 2000.
- and what they don’t • not comprehensive (although effectively so) • current value of property • present size of mortgage outstanding • residential mortgages often used to raise business capital • most crucially– what real estate an individual owns
Again much remains hidden • life assurance policies not in the public domain • pensions likewise (although some data for directors of listed companies) • so we’ll concentrate on ‘securities and shares’ • and also directors’ remuneration
‘Securities and shares’ • ‘securities’ is more commonly used for both • ‘shares’ confer ownership rights in companies and are publicly recorded • ‘securities’ here largely means holdings of ‘bonds’ (loans to governments and companies), which are not
Partnership forms • Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) – treated like companies for disclosure purposes and have to file accounts at Companies House • Limited Partnerships – no financial statements filed • General Partnerships – not recorded at Companies House
Private companies • often difficult to research in detail • exemptions from filing mean that only 1 in 8 of actively trading companies file accounts at Companies House • less information in private company accounts • so we’ll concentrate on Public Limited Liability companies (PLCs)
Sources of data • primary • secondary • for an individual’s shareholdings and dividends • directors’ remuneration
Primary shareholder data • recorded (along with any changes) in registers held by company • although this function outsourced to registrars by larger firms with many shareholders • Annual Returns (include a full list of shareholders and the number of shares held) filed at Companies House • ‘bulk shareholders lists’ • Directors’ Report in annual report and accounts show ‘substantial’ shareholdings • Notes to accounts show ‘directors’ emoluments’
Directors’ Report data • lists directors • charitable contributions by company • for PLCs only – ‘substantial shareholdings’ defined as 3% or more of total voting share capital
Substantial Shareholdings At the date of this report, the directors are aware of the following interests which represent a 3% or greater interest in the issued share capital of the Company in addition to those of the directors referred to in note 25 to the financial statements. Number of Percentage of ordinary shares issued ordinary share capital Wheddon Limited 33,999,999 29.8% OMX Securities Nominees Limited 7,177,033 6.3% Pershing Keen Nominees Limited 5,996,808 5.3% Charitable Contributions During the year the Group made charitable donations of £800 (2006: £575).
Notes to accounts • ‘Directors emoluments’ are shown as a note • however, less detail is available for smaller companies • data is shown as bands rather than exact figures • individual directors’ salaries not identified
Listed companies only • following business scandals of late 1980s growing emphasis on ‘corporate governance’ • ‘Cadbury’ and other reports incorporated into ‘Combined Code’ for companies listed on London Stock Exchange • a ‘Remuneration Report’ for board members filed with each annual report • n.b. only around 1,800 out of 11,500 PLCs are listed
Remuneration report • details of holdings (and their share options) in their company by individual directors is a key item
RNS announcements • London Stock Exchange’s Regulatory News Service provides immediate information to market • any change in a director’s holdings must be reported through the RNS • also acquisition by any party of a 3% plus holding (or if existing one falls below this threshold) • or if these holdings rise or decrease by more than 1% of total voting share capital
Some good sources • Karen Blakeman’s portal (www.rba.co.uk) • London Stock Exchange itself (www.londonstockexchange.com) • Hemmington Scott (www.hemscott.com)
Share options • rights given to directors to buy up to a given number of their company’s shares at a set price • an incentive to push up market share price • director who has exercised their option will profit if this rises above the ‘exercise price’ of option • potentially very profitable so included in Remuneration Report
A complication • shares can be held by ‘beneficial’ owners or by ‘nominees’ on their behalf • primary sources often show holdings in names of nominees • no legal mechanism to force private companies to reveal beneficial owners • but PLCs can demand ‘Section 212 Notices’ disclosing this for substantial holdings
Secondary shareholding services • confined to quoted companies • raw data taken from registrars, RNS announcements, Section 212 notices • combined to allow analysis of both • a company’s shareholding structure • holdings by investors (but these are overwhelmingly institutional rather than personal investors)
Key UK services • Argus – The Owners Service • Citywatch • see ‘Share Ownership’ in business information service aggregator Alacra (www.alacra.com)
Value of individual shareholdings • total number of shares held multiplied by current share price (but check on trends in the price) • however, shares only realisable if sold!
Dividends • income from shareholdings in those companies actually paying them • payouts are recorded as ‘Dividends Per Share’ in the ‘profit and loss account’ of the annual report • not the same as ‘Earnings Per Share’! • multiply this by number of shares held to find total dividends an individual shareholder receives
Remuneration report • corporate governance debate recognised salaries of directors are often only part of their remuneration • so the report covers other elements • fees paid to them (such as ‘golden hellos’) • share options • bonuses • pension contributions paid by company • benefits (cars, private medical insurance, etc.)
Conclusions • public domain documentation is not sufficient to research individual wealth • yet it has an useful role to play • just don’t expect assembling it to be quick or easy!
Finally, a source of help when all else has failed • Free Pint (www.freepint.com) – a global community of researchers • the ‘Bar’ allows one to table a question – or provide the answer or some guidance and advice
Feel free to get in touch! • Chris Murphy • Ravensbourne Research Limited • ravensbourneresearch@tiscali.co.uk • chrismurphy1999@yahoo.co.uk • 020 8658 0487 • 0780 3507753