10 likes | 25 Views
I prefer to be pragmatic and focus on what will make a difference in the lives of real people rather than wage some secret war to remain a ghost. Confidentiality does matter but usually not confidentiality at all costs but rather confidentiality from the general public or certain individuals or entities and all of this is fairly easy to do compared with the absolute secrecy people sometimes pursue by going international.<br><br>https://consumerscomment.com/keto-advanced-weight-loss-reviews/<br><br>https://dietsheriff.com/nutra-keto-24-review/<br><br>https://dietsheriff.com/ethereum-code-review/<br><br>https://consumerscomment.com/turmeric-forskolin-review/
E N D
Forex Megadroid - The Ideal Forex Robot For Beginners Remember what we said earlier. Banks and registered agents tend to get the information of the directors and shareholders with a particular focus on the UBO. So if someone doesn't want their information on a company, a bank account, etc. the way it is achieved is by not being the UBO. This goes beyond a nominee, nominees don't provide their info to a bank. It is achieved through foundations, trusts, and fraud. Foundations and trusts fall into one category the important note being that in many jurisdictions trusts are private documents that don't require disclosure so some trustees might be willing to go on a bank account without disclosing the details contained therein to the bank. Foundations sometimes have specific privacy provisions that achieve the same thing. Fraud is when criminals and others will do something like paying a homeless person to get a passport, etc. and use the homeless person's info on the company and account rather than going on personally. They'll also use the information of dead people or probably numerous other schemes. For those determined to maintain secrecy this goes a long way towards achieving it. There are still potential gaps. Data left on computers, bank statements, foolish conversation, financial transactions traceable to a given person, etc. The challenge with these if someone is willing to go all the way regarding secrecy is even if you could trace the bank statements, etc. the person in question isn't the legal owner so it's difficult to enforce on them. If there is evidence they have power over the accounts and companies and trusts they could be held in contempt for failing to take action but it's a challenging thing to enforce especially if all the pieces are in other countries. Still, the paper trails are worth noting because for many people it is them and not some government or bank leak that results in exposure. Two bottom line points I hope you take away. First, there's a big difference between the theory and practice of secrecy. Real secrecy has a lot of holes in it. It's all too often that someone will try to keep their offshore debit card secret but use it at the same time as their rewards card at the grocery store tying the two together. Real secrecy takes a lot of vigilance, which brings us to the second point. Do you really need secrecy. If so what kind of secrecy. What are you protecting yourself from and is that real. Often, secrecy is overrated it. It might be possible but at what price and for what benefit. https://consumerscomment.com/keto-advanced-weight-loss-reviews/ https://dietsheriff.com/nutra-keto-24-review/ https://dietsheriff.com/ethereum-code-review/ https://consumerscomment.com/turmeric-forskolin-review/