1 / 16

2013 Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar

2013 Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar. Neil Naftzger and Samantha Sugar March 1, 2013. Topics. Review site coordinator and staff survey data collection efforts and address any questions project directors have about the process

dale
Download Presentation

2013 Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2013 Washington 21st CCLC EvaluationMarch 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha Sugar March 1, 2013

  2. Topics • Review site coordinator and staff survey data collection efforts and address any questions project directors have about the process • Review suggestions for modifying the leading indicator reports • Highlight the new local evaluation guidelines

  3. Survey Timeline • Site coordinator and staff survey data collection interface is now open • Emails to project directors containing survey links were sent on Friday, February 22 • Complete surveys from site coordinator and afterschool program staff are due April 5th

  4. Survey Administration Process • Once logged into the Project Director Survey Management page: • Ensure the centers listed for a given grant are correct and send any corrections needed to WA21stcclc@air.org • Under the name of each center, a survey Web link unique to each center is provided • This link needs to be forwarded to the site coordinator for that center • When the link is clicked on, the respondent will be asked to create a survey account and then be prompted to take the survey in question • Site coordinators and staff will utilize the same link to create a survey account and take the survey for their role in the program • You can return to the Project Director Survey Management page to view the completion status of surveys and send emailreminders • ideally, a minimum of 12 staff per site should be identified per center

  5. Questions About Leading Indicators • Site coordinator survey will contain questions about the leading indicator reports and the advanced planning with data sessions held last fall • Interested in learning what impact these efforts have had, if any, on internal program improvement efforts • How have you or your staff used the leading indicator reports and/or the tools provided in the advanced training with data session to inform quality-related discussions in your program?

  6. Leading Indicators • The collection of site coordinator and staff survey data represents the start of the leading indicator reporting process for 2012-13 • Goal is to make leading indicator reports available in PPICS by August 15, 2013 • Now is the time to make any changes to the leading indicator reports to make them more useful for programs

  7. Suggestions • Provide more clarity on the presentation and interpretation of youth outcome data • Allow for the presentation of leading indicator data at the grantee level • Include a more dashboard-like summary at the top of the report • Allow access to data obtained from state data warehouses to further support local evaluation efforts

  8. Questions • What additional changes would you recommend be made to the leading indicator reports? • What changes should be made to the rollout of the reports and processes to support report utilization?

  9. PPICS Data Collection Schedule

  10. PPICS Webinars • Two Webinars will be held in April and May 2013 to provide a review of PPICS reporting requirements • Friday, April 19th at 10:00 am Pacific - General Overview of APR Reporting Requirements • Friday, May 3rd at 10:00 am Pacific - Focus on the WA Attendee Module

  11. Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions - Purpose • More structure with more freedom • Reduce redundancies • Improve the quality of reports

  12. Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions - Method • Use multiple data sources to justify revisions • Local Evaluator Interviews • Project Director Interviews • Survey data • AIR review of local evaluation reports • Review of draft revisions by LIAG

  13. Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions – Findings • Program goals & objectives • Remove requirement on more cumbersome data elements • Guidance on how to present data • Guidance on how to include other sources of data • Inclusion of a logic model/theory of change • Guidance on support provided by local evaluator • Need for annual meeting for local evaluators • Need for exemplars of quality reports

  14. Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions – Changes Made • Evaluation Process • Guidance on timelines, goals and objectives, evaluation plans. • Guidance on submitting and reviewing reports • Report Content • Required elements • Recommended elements • Report Format • Guidance on expectations

  15. Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions • Available by Friday, March 8th!

  16. For Additional Help

More Related