1.06k likes | 1.07k Views
Psycholinguistics I. LING 640. What is psycholinguistics about?. Guiding Questions. What do speakers of a language mentally represent? How did those representations get there? How are those representations constructed? How are those representations encoded?.
E N D
Psycholinguistics I LING 640
Guiding Questions • What do speakers of a language mentally represent? • How did those representations get there? • How are those representations constructed? • How are those representations encoded?
Language is a Human Specialization • Species specificity • Within-species invariance • Spontanous development, insensitivity to input • Independence of general intelligence • Selective brain damage • The ‘Language Instinct’ [Pinker 1994]; see Gleitman & Newport chapter [readings] for nice summary • These arguments suggest that there’s a coherent object of study, but tell us very little about its form
We need explicit answers… • What do speakers of a language mentally represent? • How did those representations get there? • How are those representations constructed? • How are those representations encoded?
A Simple(-ish) Example • Distribution of pronouns/reflexives • John likes him/himself. • John thinks that Mary likes him/himself. • Infinitival clauses • John appeared to Bill to like himself. • John appeared to Bill to like him. • But… • John appealed to Bill to like himself. • John appealed to Bill to like him. • Abstract solution… • Johni appealed to Billj [PROj to like himselfj ]
Abstraction • Abstraction is valuable • Provides representational power • Provides representational freedom • Abstraction is costly • Linguistic representations are more distant from experience • This places a burden on the learner - motivation for innate knowledge • This places a burden on comprehension/production systems • (and it makes it harder to know what to look for in the brain)
Sensory Maps Internal representations of the outside world. Cellular neuroscience has discovered a great deal in this area.
Frequency - Vowels • Vowels combine acoustic energy at a number of different frequencies • Different vowels ([a], [i], [u] etc.) contain acoustic energy at different frequencies • Listeners must perform a ‘frequency analysis’ of vowels in order to identify them(Fourier Analysis)
Synthesized Speech • Allows for precise control of sounds • Valuable tool for investigating perception
Voice Onset Time (VOT) 60 msec
English VOT production • Not uniform • 2 categories
Perceiving VOT ‘Categorical Perception’
Discrimination A More Systematic Test Same/Different D D 0ms 60ms 0ms 20ms D T 20ms 40ms Same/Different 0ms 10ms T T 40ms 60ms Same/Different Within-Category Discrimination is Hard 40ms 40ms
Quantifying Sensitivity • Response bias • Two measures of discrimination • Accuracy: how often is the judge correct? • Sensitivity: how well does the judge distinguish the categories? • Quantifying sensitivity • Hits MissesFalse Alarms Correct Rejections • Compare p(H) against p(FA)
Quantifying Sensitivity • Is one of these more impressive? • p(H) = 0.75, p(FA) = 0.25 • p(H) = 0.95, p(FA) = 0.45 • A measure that amplifies small percentage differences at extremesz-scores
Dispersionaround mean Mean (µ) √( ) ∑(x - µ)2 n Normal Distribution Standard Deviation A measure of dispersionaround the mean.
The Empirical Rule 1 s.d. from mean: 68% of data 2 s.d. from mean: 95% of data 3 s.d. from mean: 99.7% of data
Quantifying Sensitivity • A z-score is a reexpression of a data point in units of standard deviations.(Sometimes also known as standard score) • In z-score data, µ = 0, = 1 • Sensitivity score d’ = z(H) - z(FA)
(Näätänen et al. 1997) (Aoshima et al. 2004) (Maye et al. 2002)
Dispersionaround mean Mean (µ) √( ) ∑(x - µ)2 n Normal Distribution Standard Deviation A measure of dispersionaround the mean.
The Empirical Rule 1 s.d. from mean: 68% of data 2 s.d. from mean: 95% of data 3 s.d. from mean: 99.7% of data
Normal Distribution Standard deviation = 2.5 inches Heights of American Females, aged 18-24 Mean (µ) 65.5 inches
If we observe 1 individual, how likely is it that his score is at least 2 s.d. from the mean? • Put differently, if we observe somebody whose score is 2 s.d. or more from the population mean, how likely is it that the person is drawn from that population?
If we observe 2 people, how likely is it that they both fall 2 s.d. or more from the mean? • …and if we observe 10 people, how likely is it that their mean score is 2 s.d. from the group mean? • If we do find such a group, they’re probably from a different population
If we observe a group whose mean differs from the population mean by 2 s.e., how likely is it that this group was drawn from the same population?