1 / 77

Mortality Measurement at Advanced Ages

Mortality Measurement at Advanced Ages. Dr. Natalia S. Gavrilova, Ph.D. Dr. Leonid A. Gavrilov, Ph.D. Center on Aging NORC and The University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois, USA. Additional files. http://health-studies.org/tutorial/gompertz.xls

dallon
Download Presentation

Mortality Measurement at Advanced Ages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mortality Measurement at Advanced Ages Dr. Natalia S. Gavrilova, Ph.D. Dr. Leonid A. Gavrilov, Ph.D. Center on Aging NORC and The University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois, USA

  2. Additional files • http://health-studies.org/tutorial/gompertz.xls • http://health-studies.org/tutorial/Sullivan.xls

  3. The Concept of Life Table • Life table is a classic demographic format of describing a population's mortality experience with age. Life Table is built of a number of standard numerical columns representing various indicators of mortality and survival. The concept of life table was first suggested in 1662 by John Graunt. Before the 17th century, death was believed to be a magical or sacred phenomenon that could not and should not be quantified.  The invention of life table was a scientific breakthrough in mortality studies.

  4. Life Table • Cohort life table as a simple example • Consider survival in the cohort of fruit flies born in the same time

  5. Number of dying, d(x)

  6. Number of survivors, l(x)

  7. Number of survivors at the beginning of the next age interval: l(x+1) = l(x) – d(x) Probability of death in the age interval: q(x) = d(x)/l(x)

  8. Probability of death, q(x)

  9. Person-years lived in the interval, L(x) L(x) are needed to calculate life expectancy. Life expectancy, e(x), is defined as an average number of years lived after certain age. L(x) are also used in calculation of net reproduction rate (NRR)

  10. Calculation of life expectancy, e(x) Life expectancy at birth is estimated as an area below the survival curve divided by the number of individuals at birth

  11. Life expectancy, e(x) • T(x) = L(x) + … + Lω where Lω is L(x) for the last age interval. Summation starts from the last age interval and goes back to the age at which life expectancy is calculated. • e(x) = T(x)/l(x) where x = 0, 1, …,ω

  12. Life Tables for Human Populations • In the majority of cases life tables for humans are constructed for hypothetical birth cohort using cross-sectional data • Such life tables are called period life tables • Construction of period life tables starts from q(x) values rather than l(x) or d(x) as in the case of experimental animals

  13. Formula for q(x) using age-specific mortality rates a(x) called the fraction of the last interval of life is usually equal to 0.5 for all ages except for the first age (from 0 to 1) Having q(x) calculated, data for all other life table columns are estimated using standard formulas.

  14. Life table probabilities of death, q(x), for men in Russia and USA. 2005

  15. Period life table for hypothetical population • Number of survivors, l(x), at the beginning is equal to 100,000 • This initial number of l(x) is called the radix of life table

  16. Life table number of survivors, l(x), for men in Russia and USA. 2005.

  17. Life table number of dying, d(x), for men in Russia and USA. 2005

  18. Life expectancy, e(x), for men in Russia and USA. 2005

  19. Trends in life expectancy for men in Russia, USA and Estonia

  20. Trends in life expectancy for women in Russia, USA and Estonia

  21. A growing number of persons living beyond age 80 emphasizes the need for accurate measurement and modeling of mortality at advanced ages.

  22. What do we know about late-life mortality?

  23. Mortality deceleration at advanced ages. • After age 95, the observed risk of death [red line] deviates from the value predicted by an early model, the Gompertz law [black line]. • Mortality of Swedish women for the period of 1990-2000 from the Kannisto-Thatcher Database on Old Age Mortality • Source: Gavrilov, Gavrilova, “Why we fall apart. Engineering’s reliability theory explains human aging”. IEEE Spectrum. 2004.

  24. M. Greenwood, J. O. Irwin. BIOSTATISTICS OF SENILITY

  25. Mortality Leveling-Off in House FlyMusca domestica Based on life table of 4,650 male house flies published by Rockstein & Lieberman, 1959

  26. Non-Aging Mortality Kinetics in Later Life Source: A. Economos. A non-Gompertzian paradigm for mortality kinetics of metazoan animals and failure kinetics of manufactured products. AGE, 1979, 2: 74-76.

  27. Mammals: Mice (Lindop, 1961; Sacher, 1966; Economos, 1979) Rats (Sacher, 1966) Horse, Sheep, Guinea pig (Economos, 1979; 1980) However no mortality deceleration is reported for Rodents (Austad, 2001) Baboons (Bronikowski et al., 2002) Mortality Deceleration in Animal Species Invertebrates: • Nematodes, shrimps, bdelloid rotifers, degenerate medusae (Economos, 1979) • Drosophila melanogaster (Economos, 1979; Curtsinger et al., 1992) • Housefly, blowfly (Gavrilov, 1980) • Medfly (Carey et al., 1992) • Bruchid beetle (Tatar et al., 1993) • Fruit flies, parasitoid wasp (Vaupel et al., 1998)

  28. Existing Explanations of Mortality Deceleration • Population Heterogeneity (Beard, 1959; Sacher, 1966). “… sub-populations with the higher injury levels die out more rapidly, resulting in progressive selection for vigour in the surviving populations” (Sacher, 1966) • Exhaustion of organism’s redundancy (reserves) at extremely old ages so that every random hit results in death (Gavrilov, Gavrilova, 1991; 2001) • Lower risks of death for older people due to less risky behavior (Greenwood, Irwin, 1939) • Evolutionary explanations (Mueller, Rose, 1996; Charlesworth, 2001)

  29. Mortality at Advanced Ages – 20 years ago Source:Gavrilov L.A., Gavrilova N.S. The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach, NY: Harwood Academic Publisher, 1991

  30. Mortality at Advanced Ages, Recent Study Source: Manton et al. (2008). Human Mortality at Extreme Ages: Data from the NLTCS and Linked Medicare Records. Math.Pop.Studies

  31. Mortality force (hazard rate) is the best indicator to study mortality at advanced ages • Does not depend on the length of age interval • Has no upper boundary and theoretically can grow unlimitedly • Famous Gompertz law was proposed for fitting age-specific mortality force function (Gompertz, 1825)

  32. Problems in Hazard Rate Estimation At Extremely Old Ages Mortality deceleration in humans may be an artifact of mixing different birth cohorts with different mortality (heterogeneity effect) Standard assumptions of hazard rate estimates may be invalid when risk of death is extremely high Ages of very old people may be highly exaggerated

  33. Social Security Administration’s Death Master File (SSA’s DMF) Helps to Alleviate the First Two Problems • Allows to study mortality in large, more homogeneous single-year or even single-month birth cohorts • Allows to estimate mortality in one-month age intervals narrowing the interval of hazard rates estimation

  34. What Is SSA’s DMF ? • As a result of a court case under the Freedom of Information Act, SSA is required to release its death information to the public. SSA’s DMF contains the complete and official SSA database extract, as well as updates to the full file of persons reported to SSA as being deceased. • SSA DMF is no longer a publicly available data resource (now is available from Ancestry.com for fee) • We used DMF full file obtained from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Last deaths occurred in September 2011.

  35. SSA’s DMF Advantage • Some birth cohorts covered by DMF could be studied by the method of extinct generations • Considered superior in data quality compared to vital statistics records by some researchers

  36. Social Security Administration’s Death Master File (DMF) Was Used in This Study: To estimate hazard rates for relatively homogeneous single-year extinct birth cohorts (1881-1895) To obtain monthly rather than traditional annual estimates of hazard rates To identify the age interval and cohort with reasonably good data quality and compare mortality models

  37. Monthly Estimates of Mortality are More AccurateSimulation assuming Gompertz law for hazard rate Stata package uses the Nelson-Aalen estimate of hazard rate: H(x) is a cumulative hazard function, dxis the number of deaths occurring at time x and nx is the number at risk at time x before the occurrence of the deaths. This method is equivalent to calculation of probabilities of death:

  38. Hazard rate estimates at advanced ages based on DMF Nelson-Aalen monthly estimates of hazard rates using Stata 11

  39. More recent birth cohort mortality Nelson-Aalen monthly estimates of hazard rates using Stata 11

  40. Hypothesis Mortality deceleration at advanced ages among DMF cohorts may be caused by poor data quality (age exaggeration) at very advanced ages If this hypothesis is correct then mortality deceleration at advanced ages should be less expressed for data with better quality

  41. Quality Control (1) Study of mortality in the states with different quality of age reporting: Records for persons applied to SSN in the Southern states were found to be of lower quality (Rosenwaike, Stone, 2003) We compared mortality of persons applied to SSN in Southern states, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, CA and NY with mortality of persons applied in the Northern states (the remainder)

  42. Mortality for data with presumably different quality: Southern and Non-Southern states of SSN receipt The degree of deceleration was evaluated using quadratic model

  43. Quality Control (2) Study of mortality for earlier and later single-year extinct birth cohorts: Records for later born persons are supposed to be of better quality due to improvement of age reporting over time.

  44. Mortality for data with presumably different quality: Older and younger birth cohorts The degree of deceleration was evaluated using quadratic model

  45. At what age interval data have reasonably good quality? A study of age-specific mortality by gender

  46. Women have lower mortality at advanced ages Hence number of females to number of males ratio should grow with age

  47. Observed female to male ratio at advanced ages for combined 1887-1892 birth cohort

  48. Age of maximum female to male ratio by birth cohort

  49. Modeling mortality at advanced ages • Data with reasonably good quality were used: Northern states and 88-106 years age interval • Gompertz and logistic (Kannisto) models were compared • Nonlinear regression model for parameter estimates (Stata 11) • Model goodness-of-fit was estimated using AIC and BIC

More Related