310 likes | 459 Views
GPA and Health Educator Success: Do Grades Really Matter?. Susan M. Radius , PhD, MCHES Professor & Program Director Meghan M. Bailey , MS, CHES Lecturer & Internship Supervisor Theresa K. Jackson , PhD, MPH, CHES Public Health Scientist Army Institute of Public Health.
E N D
GPA and Health Educator Success: Do Grades Really Matter? • Susan M. Radius,PhD, MCHES • Professor & Program Director • Meghan M. Bailey, MS, CHES • Lecturer & Internship Supervisor • Theresa K. Jackson, PhD, MPH, CHES • Public Health Scientist • Army Institute of Public Health American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance National Convention Session 331 Charlotte, NC Thursday, April 25, 2013
Disclosures Susan M. Radius, PhD, MCHES Meghan M. Bailey, MS, CHES Theresa K. Jackson, PhD, MPH, CHES • The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation existed during the past 12 months: • No relationships to disclose
Purpose • To explore the relationship between students’ academic performance and internship outcomes • To evaluate extent to which students are gaining exposure to selected NCHEC competencies • To guide recommendations for undergraduate curricula and internship programs
Instrumentation • Evaluations • Midterm & Final • 53 questions related to professionalism, personal attributes, organization skills, and communication skills • Two indicators assigned for each NCHEC competency
Analyses of Evaluation Indicators • Cumulative GPA • Majors’ course grades
Health Care in the US (207) • No statistically significant associations
Organization, Implementation, and Management of Health Education Programs (430)
Indicators Unrelated (p>05) to GPA or Class • I. Access, use, and evaluate reliable health resources • II. Uses knowledge of learning styles • III. Demonstrates teaching skills • VI. Knows how and where to refer clients • VII. Demonstrates culture, gender, and racial sensitivity • Would you consider hiring?
Internship Possibilities • Agency supervisors • Generous evaluators • Biased; self-fulfilling prophecy • Misinterpret evaluation items • Different interpretations of indicators across diverse sites • Students • Self-select placements in areas of strength • Maturity • Self-select major
Program Possibilities • Faculty • Number of course instructors • Easy vs. more rigorous graders • Courses • Upper-level vs. lower-level abilities • Cumulative GPA includes transferred grades
Instrumentation • Not all NCHEC competencies represented on instrument • Instrument inconsistent in ability to capture qualities of interest • Selected NCHEC indicators may reflect other or >1 competency
General Implications • Not all courses relate to success in internship measures • Not all competencies relate to success in courses • Despite quantity of significant correlations, no strong correlations emerged
Professional & Academic Implications • Professionals & Agencies • Agencies should continue to evaluate transcripts as part of the hiring process in health education. • Academic Institutions • Professional preparation programs may need to adapt to address NCHEC competencies in a practical way. • Internship experiences should complement other health education experiences – including the classroom.
Take Home Messages • Share evaluation with preceptors, faculty colleagues and students • Consider internship assessment tools that are more reflective of NCHEC • Cultivate preceptor understanding of program, NCHEC, etc. • Communicate to students that doing well can help to excel as health educator • Communicate to students that grades are NOT everything • Encourage faculty to incorporate NCHEC-related activities in coursework
Dr. Susan Radius Professor and Program Director sradius@towson.edu Meghan Bailey Lecturer mbailey@towson.edu Dr. Theresa Jackson Public Health Scientist US Army For more information, please visit: http://www.towson.edu/healthscience/healthed/internships/