1 / 7

Observation of X(1835) in

Observation of X(1835) in. Analysis of. X(1835) 5.1 . BESII Preliminary. BESII Preliminary. Analysis of. X(1835) 6.0 . BESII Preliminary. BESII Preliminary. Observation of X(1835) in. Statistical Significance 7.7 . BESII Preliminary.

damali
Download Presentation

Observation of X(1835) in

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Observation of X(1835) in

  2. Analysis of X(1835) 5.1  BESII Preliminary BESII Preliminary

  3. Analysis of X(1835) 6.0  BESII Preliminary BESII Preliminary

  4. Observation of X(1835) in Statistical Significance 7.7  BESII Preliminary The sum +- mass spectrum for  decaying into +- and  

  5. Mass spectrum fitting The sum +- mass spectrum for  decaying into +- and   7.7 BESII Preliminary

  6. X(1835) could be the same structure as what is indicated by ppbar mass threshold enhancement • X(1835) mass is consistent with the mass of the s-wave resonance indicated by the ppbar mass threshold enhancement. Its width is 1.9 higher than the upper limit of the width obtained from ppbar mass threshold enhancement. • On the other hand, if the FSI effect is included in the fit of the ppbar mass spectrum, the width of the resonance near ppbar mass threshold will become larger.

  7. Fit to J/p pbar including FSI Include FSI curve from A.Sirbirtsev et al.(hep-ph/ 0411386) in the fit (I=0) M = 1830.6  6.7 MeV  = 0  93 MeV In good agreement with X(1835)

More Related