1 / 20

Pension Funds and Insurance Companies: Challenges and Lessons

Pension Funds and Insurance Companies: Challenges and Lessons. Dimitri Vittas Senior Adviser World Bank December 2003. Pension Funds and Insurance Companies. NBFIs are a mixed bag of institutions. Pension funds and insurance companies are the most important:

damia
Download Presentation

Pension Funds and Insurance Companies: Challenges and Lessons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pension Funds and Insurance Companies:Challenges and Lessons Dimitri Vittas Senior Adviser World Bank December 2003

  2. Pension Funds and Insurance Companies • NBFIs are a mixed bag of institutions. • Pension funds and insurance companies are the most important: • in terms of mobilization of long-term resources • potential impact on capital market development • acting as countervailing force to commercial banks. • They can help finance factoring and leasing companies and also promote housing finance and equity and debt market development.

  3. Development and Regulatory Challenges • They take a long time to develop. • Magic of contractual saving and interest compounding. • They start slow but they build large assets over time. • Their success depends on stable macroeconomic policies, low inflation, fiscal balance. • They require prudent management and the offer of affordable benefits. • They require stable banking system, robust regulatory framework and effective supervision.

  4. Private versus Public Management • Public sector ownership has caused poor performance in many developing countries. • Pervasive controls on insurance companies, covering premiums, investments, benefits, and reinsurance, have impeded the emergence of strong, efficient and well capitalized companies. • Public management of the assets of pension and provident funds, including social security institutions, has produced highly negative real returns. • Use of contractual savings as a captive source of funding large government deficits.

  5. Reform Agenda in Africa • Downsize public pillar. • Improve assets management of public pension funds by building strong fund governance. • Appoint executive board of trustees with clear mandate and safeguards against political interference. • Create room for private pension funds and promote private sector presence in insurance sector. • Eliminate captivity of contractual savings, encourage modern efficient assets management, and allow investment overseas. • Build robust regulatory and supervisory capacity.

  6. Build Efficient Institutions • The key to the success of the reform agenda is the building of efficient institutions. • Pension systems and insurance business are highly complex. They cover long-term contracts and are faced with considerable risk and uncertainty. They need to be based on public trust. • Building efficient institutions that are able to adapt and respond to emerging new challenges is very important. • Mauritius offers a very good example of the dynamic and durable benefits of building efficient institutions in both pensions and insurance.

  7. Mauritius Pension System • Multi-pillar structure. Both public and private. • Basic Retirement Pensions. • National Pension Funds. • National Saving Funds. • Occupational Pension Funds. • Life Insurance Companies. • Housing Assets. • The system is generally well developed and managed.

  8. Large Contractual Savings • Large accumulation of financial assets. • NPF 17% of GDP. • NSF 2%. • Insurance companies 18%. • Occupational pension funds 11%. • Total 48% of GDP. However, double counting of 7%. • Net assets: 54 billion MUR or 41% of GDP. • Large potential impact on financial sector development, economic growth and security of long-term benefits.

  9. Basic Retirement Pension • Offers 20% of average wage to all elderly (more to the very old). • Current cost is low at 3% of GDP, but on unchanged policies likely to grow in the future and reach 6% in 2020 and 11% in 2050. • Need to contain its future costs because of aging. • Gradually raise retirement age. • Offer means-tested benefits, either affluence test (exclude those above specified level) or subsistence test (include only those below) or a combination of tests with gradual claw backs.

  10. National Pensions Fund • Well run system: high coverage (60%); low contribution rate (9%); low operating costs (39 bp); high returns (11.72%) in 2001. • But based on opaque points system. • And failure to attain promised replacement rate of 33.3%. • Possible move to NDC scheme. • Appoint independent Board of Trustees and encourage professional assets management.

  11. Occupational Pension Funds • Several types and many schemes. Total coverage between 80,000 and 100,000 employees. • Schemes for civil servants and employees of local government. • Over 100 schemes for employees of statutory bodies. • Over 1000 schemes for employees of private sector firms. • Need to reform civil service schemes but private funds well managed.

  12. Performance of Occupational Pension Funds • Good overall performance with some exceptions. • Generous benefits raising questions about long-term affordability. • High assets diversification but underweight in government bonds and corporate debentures. Illiquid investments in equities and real estates. Large role in housing loans to members. • Low costs and high returns.

  13. Regulation and Supervision of OPFs • Reasonable rules on vesting and portability. • Compliance of sponsors with actuarial and accounting standards, especially MAS 25 (IAS 19). • Though no requirement to hire qualified auditors and publish audited accounts. • Fragmented regulatory framework. • Lack of supervision and transparency.

  14. Need for New Regulatory Framework • Consolidate legal framework into new, modern act. • Emphasize: • fund governance; • appropriate funding levels; • rules on vesting and portability; • assets segregation and safe custody; • assets diversification (with limits on self-investment); • market valuations; • actuarial, accounting and auditing standards; and • “whistle blowing” duties.

  15. Need for Effective Supervision • Strengthen supervision under FSC. • Improve transparency, require quarterly financial reporting in electronic form. • Protect workers’ rights. • Reform NPF. Bring under FSC. • Provide choice to employers and employees.

  16. Development of Insurance Sector • Free from pervasive premiums, products , investments & reinsurance controls. • Reliance on solvency monitoring. • Use of international accounting & actuarial standards. • General insurance makes good use of reinsurance. • Motor insurance largest branch in general business. • Reasonable loss ratios and claims settlement. • Life insurance is well developed, benefiting from tax incentives as well as pension funds and housing finance.

  17. Investments of Insurance Companies • Diversified portfolio. • Underweight in government bonds but strong presence in housing loans and corporate bonds and equities. • Strong demand for long duration assets to cope with reinvestment risk. • Limited investments overseas despite high ceiling.

  18. Insurance Regulation and Supervision • Marked improvement in recent years. • Need for greater emphasis on risk-based supervision and risk management. • Most companies are well managed but some small companies appear weak with low earnings, high costs and slow claims processing. • Need to develop early warning systems and regulatory ladders to take early action against weak companies. • Growing reliance on actuaries and auditors to identify problems.

  19. Main Lessons for Africa • Development of strong contractual savings sector is feasible in a small economy. • Need for economic and political stability. • Respect of property rights. • Good mix of public and private provisions. • Robust regulatory framework and effective supervision. • Focus on building efficient institutions that are able to respond to emerging challenges in a dynamic environment.

  20. Implications for Capital Markets • Develop long-term government bonds. • Avoid roll over risk and offer long duration assets to institutional investors. • Promote transparency of securities markets and efficient trading, clearing and settlement facilities. • Support financing of housing through direct loans, mortgage bonds or mortgage securitization. • Develop professional expertise in accounting and auditing, actuarial science, assets management and other areas.

More Related