1 / 31

Problems in Canadian Business Law

Problems in Canadian Business Law. Pol/Soc Sci 3165 6.0A Tuesdays, 2:30-5:30 pm Simon Archer sarcher@torys.com. Introduction PCBL. Learning objectives Basic familiarity with legal concepts that businesses use and are formed by Hot topics in business law Research ability

damian
Download Presentation

Problems in Canadian Business Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Problems in Canadian Business Law Pol/Soc Sci 3165 6.0A Tuesdays, 2:30-5:30 pm Simon Archer sarcher@torys.com

  2. Introduction PCBL • Learning objectives • Basic familiarity with legal concepts that businesses use and are formed by • Hot topics in business law • Research ability • Critical approaches • After course should be able to understand basic vocabulary of business law, identify how to research business law problems.

  3. Introduction cont’d • Course format • Assigned readings • Supplementary readings • Lecture and guest lecture • Division of 3-hour timeslot • Multimedia where possible • Self-directed research

  4. Introduction cont’d • Grading scheme • Evaluation format • Deadlines • Researching and writing research papers • See handout

  5. Research Papers • Select topic, narrow topic • Secondary sources first, primary sources second • Typical public policy options and analysis: • Conceptual problems (e.g., definitions), analytical problems (e.g., consistent reasoning), empirical problems (e.g., how measured, how common, etc.)

  6. Research papers cont’d • Single most important “legal” skill • Expectations: • Argumentative paper • Based on actual research conducted • Your very best effort, not a draft • Review academic policy on plagiarism • USE writing and researching aids and other resources from York

  7. Writing tips • Prepare by reading other people’s opinions on your subject • Use outlines (bullet points) to develop your paper, don’t write from the top of your head. • Use plain English: never over-utilize hypertrophic linguistics, it sounds pompous and stupid (and many academics do this to their discredit) • See handout.

  8. Overview of PCBL • Survey course of several areas of law relating to businesses in Canada • Each topic requires a course in itself • Combine introduction to topic with “special issues” in that topic • Not a cumulative or iterative process, choose topics that interest you from entire curriculum

  9. Basic contents of course • Constitutional distinctions • Common law and equity (fall) (private law?) • Law of of obligations • Contract, tort, restitution • Employment contracts, sale of goods • Equity • Trusts and fiduciaries • Regulatory schemes (spring) (public law) • Business associations • Regulation of competition and trade • Regulation of international trade • Dissolution (bankruptcy and insolvency) • Taxation • Intellectual property law

  10. Contents not covered • Property law • Transfer of property, real estate • Bailment • Insurance law • Negotiable instruments • Environmental law • E-business law (cf. contract) • YOU CAN choose these for research papers

  11. Otto

  12. Today’s lecture • Some theoretical frameworks • Sources of law • Vocabulary and distinctions in legal discourse • Identify the Willes’ position on certain issues

  13. Some characterizations of “the law” • Naturalism – law or legal systems have inherent moral or “natural” elements • Positivism – law and legal systems are constructed according to social convention • Realism – legal principles not strictly related to decisions – emphasis on analogical reasoning • Critical legal theory/Critical race theory – emphasis on analytics and distribution of power • Law-and-economics, law-and-biology: legal systems and principles as sharing homological root to other disciplines: economics and biology

  14. Sources of law for public policy questions • Why do people cheat on taxes? • Economist: because there is sufficient incentive versus risk • Sociologist: because the community condones it • Psychologist: because behaviour of risk-takers separates risk from rewards • Bay St. lawyer: define “cheating”? Creative interpretation of the Income Tax Act.

  15. Further reading for theory • The Willes’ • Doesn’t take a clear position (but hints of the libertarian, consistent with mainstream business press?) • Question: are courts state or non-state institutions? • Standard introduction: J.W. Harris, Legal Philosophies, 2nd ed., 1997.

  16. Bottom line • Be aware many approaches and forms of legal theory • Be aware many sources of evidence that “explain” law, legal systems, legal behaviours • Try to choose ones that seem appropriate to the problem

  17. Some legal sources • Three main sources of formal law • Parliament, legislatures, domestic courts • “Black letter law” – “jurisprudence” • Constitutions • Statutes • Judicial decision-making (case law) • Treatises, commentaries (from Blackstone to Peter Hogg) • Secondary sources (see handout) • Legal pluralism (another theoretical approach) • Individuals and groups part of many normative systems • “Gap” between formal legal principles and behavioural outcomes

  18. Sources cont’d • Other sources of institutional authority (non-state?) • Professional associations – e.g., law societies – self-regulating by statute • Industry associations and codes • Voluntary codes of conduct • Standard-setting bodies • Supra-national instruments • NAFTA, World Court

  19. The systems • Two parallel legal systems • Common law system • All provinces but Québec • Precursor and filiations with English legal system • Civil Code system • Québec, codification of all laws • cf. Roman law and Napoleonic Code

  20. Some initial vocabulary • Common law system • Origins in English legal system from communal decision-making processes in the Middle Ages to modern court system • Judge-made law, case-by-case • Origins in “writs” that could be brought naming party, cause, and “prayer for relief” • e.g., quantum meruit, a writ for services rendered but not paid for, a part of the development of contract law called quasi-contract, now called restitution, required specific wording and formula

  21. Vocabulary cont’d • Common law • Features doctrine of stare decisis • judicial decisions as main source, all courts bound by prior decision on same facts • SCC not bound • In reality many outside influences on development of doctrine

  22. Vocabulary cont’d • Equity • Initially introduced to “correct” or “supplement” perceived failures of the common law • Employs doctrine and maxims, “equity follows the law” • Equitable relief at Court of Chancery • Fusion of the courts in Canada – 1871

  23. Substantive areas • Lex mercatoria (law merchant) • First transnational business law? • Cf. relationship to arbitration, specialty courts • Current incarnation: globalization of the law of business transactions (law of New York law firms) • Why no lex laboria? • Factoid: maybe 10 cases in Canada employ the word “globalization”. Why?

  24. Vocabulary cont’d • Statute law (public law, regulatory or administrative state) • Bill – Motion/Readings • Royal Assent • Proclamation • Regulations • Powers given under statute that avoid the legislative process when figuring out how to apply a law.

  25. Vocabulary cont’d • Judicial review of state in/action • Claimed priority by “inherent jurisdiction” • Developed out of five perogative writs • Mandamus, prohibition, certiori, procendendo, quo warranto, habeus corpus • Feature of administrative law (law of regulatory state) • Highly contested/politicized area: brings up basic questions of jurisdiction and authority in democratic theory

  26. Public vs. Private • Willes: private is individual (plaintiff vs. defendant), public is individual versus state • What is use of this distinction?

  27. Substantive vs. procedural • An heuristic distinction • Usually made to distinguish the right or obligation from the way it is enforced • E.g., right to have a promise kept, but enforced through rules of civil procedure • Is there such thing as a right without a remedy? Is it “law”?

  28. Above the law?

  29. Some questions • The question of certainty • Litigation was a response to trial by ordeal. What’s different? • Do judges follow stare decisis? • Are court proceedings relatively certain ways of deciding disputes? • Do legal rules or principles have robust connection to individual or group behaviour? • Are, therefore, courts efficient from a business perspective?

  30. Addendum: case law • Elements of most reported cases/how to read a case: • Recitation of material facts • Applicable law (statutes or precedent cases) • List of issues to be decided • Analysis of issues as law is applied to facts (ratio decendi) • Ruling or outcome • In fact, the paper involved in a typical criminal case is at least a banker’s box of documents, so reported cases are stylized reports • No case law reading requirements – a waste of time

  31. Next class • Setting up the system • Current constitutional arrangements • The set up: court system in general • Can we talk about process? Procedure in general • Administrative law and regulatory state • More Simpsons?

More Related