1 / 16

Federal Regulation: 25 C.F.R. 162.017

This presentation discusses the federal regulation 25 CFR 162.017 and its impact on taxation on Indian reservations. It covers the definition of Indian land, what taxes apply to leases, and potential impacts on local governments.

damianv
Download Presentation

Federal Regulation: 25 C.F.R. 162.017

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSAC-HLT Committee Presentation Federal Regulation:25 C.F.R. 162.017 & The Questions It Raises Over Taxation On Indian Reservations By: Jennifer C. Klein, Deputy County Counsel Sonoma County Counsel’s Office May 30, 2013

  2. 25 CFR 162.017Overview • Federal Regulation • Adopted December 5, 2013 • Effective January 4, 2013 • Attempt to prohibit certain state and local taxes and fees imposed on Leased Indian Land for: • “Permanent Improvements” • “Activities” • “Leasehold or Possessory Interest”

  3. 25 CFR 162.017“On-Reservation” • “Indian Land” means land held in trust or restricted status for a tribe or individual Indian. Essentially “reservation” land. • In general, state and local governments do not have “civil regulatory” jurisdiction (i.e. land use) on Indian land, but do have “criminal prohibitory” jurisdiction (i.e. assaults).

  4. The Regulation Covers the Following… • “Permanent Improvements” • Buildings, other permanent structures • “Activities” • Sales, business activity, other transactions • Delivery of water, electricity, other services • “Leasehold or Possessory Interest” • Non-tribal concession at tribal casino (i.e. restaurant) • Non-tribal use and possession of exempt tribal land. …When on Leased Tribal Land

  5. 25 CFR 162.017Text of the Provision • § 162.017 What taxes apply to leases approved under this part?

  6. 25 CFR 162.017Text • (a) Subject only to applicable Federal law, permanent improvements on the leased land, without regard to ownership of those improvements, are not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy, or other charge imposed by any State or political subdivision of a State. Improvements may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with jurisdiction.

  7. 25 CFR 162.017Text • (b) Subject only to applicable Federal law, activities under a lease conducted on the leased premises are not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy, or other charge (e.g., business use, privilege, public utility, excise, gross revenue taxes) imposed by any State or political subdivision of a State. Activities may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with jurisdiction.

  8. 25 CFR 162.017Text • (c) Subject only to applicable Federal law, the leasehold or possessory interest is not subject to any fee, tax, assessment, levy, or other charge imposed by any State or political subdivision of a State. Leasehold or possessory interests may be subject to taxation by the Indian tribe with jurisdiction.

  9. 25 CFR 162.017“Subject to Applicable Federal Law…” • Existing Law: • Concept of Preemption • Balancing Test from U.S. Supreme Court • Cotton Petroleum v. New Mexico (1989) • White Mountain Apache v. Bracker (1980) • Federal Statute: 25 USC Section 398c.

  10. 25 CFR 162.017Gathering Info on Potential Impacts • General Financial Impact? • How much is County collecting in fees and taxes? • Now? • In the future? • Any casinos under construction? Expansion?

  11. 25 CFR 162.017Potential Impacts • Think broadly: sales tax, property tax, assessment, fees, other charges? • What services or infrastructure are supported by those taxes and fees? • Impacts to those services or infrastructure? • Some jurisdictions will have more or less “lease Indian Land” falling under this regulation.

  12. 25 CFR 162.017Potential Impacts • Other Considerations: • Unfair competitive advantage enjoyed by those who operate on leased Indian lands – particularly if Tribe does not impose equivalent tribal tax or fee.

  13. 25 CFR 162.017Potential Impacts • Other Considerations: • Timing of Impacts may vary depending on the type of tax or fee. • Possessory Interest taxes determined based on possession on January 1st of any given year. • Sales taxes – date of transaction • Water, utility delivery – potentially on going • Other?

  14. 25 CFR 162.017Current CA Lawsuits: • Desert Water Agency v. Dept. of Interior, BIA • Suit filed March 29, 2013 • DWA argues regulation either doesn’t apply to DWA or that the law is invalid because it conflicts with authorizing statute, 25 USC sec. 398c. • Feds have 60 days to respond. • Test Case

  15. 25 CFR 162.017Next Steps: • Identify potential impacts for each county or taxing authority • Talk to Assessor and Tax Collector • Collecting information concerning on reservation activities may already be a challenge; information may be incomplete • Develop legal strategy for responding to regulation with County Counsel • Consider coordinating response with state or other affected public entities.

  16. 25 CFR 162.017 The End Thank you

More Related