160 likes | 314 Views
Dynamics of reconnection and multiple activation of substorms. Study X-line signatures and examine their relationship to substorm development -Current sheet observations Jan. 09, 2008 ~ 700 UT event Feb.16, 2008 ~ 220 UT event -Remote sensing Feb.10, 2008 425UT, 545 UT event.
E N D
Dynamics of reconnection and multiple activation of substorms Study X-line signatures and examine their relationship to substorm development -Current sheet observations • Jan. 09, 2008 ~ 700 UT event • Feb.16, 2008 ~ 220 UT event -Remote sensing • Feb.10, 2008 425UT, 545 UT event 2008/02/26 Rumi Nakamura (IWF/OEAW)
Major conjunction ~0700UT AE ~400 nT With multiple activations
Tailward evolution of X-line THB: lobe PSBLPS I: BY increase II: Bz - Bz + THC: PSBL lobe PS I: BY increase, Bx decrease short dBz>0 while Bz decrease II: Bz - + THD, THE: two dipolarizations I: 654 UT THE THD II: 722 UT THD, THE Thinning CS Dipolarization I II
For reconnection current sheet, Determine flow reversal is useful DATA QUESTION? How far can we use ESA,SST moments. Looks SST portionimportant. What should we do ?
BBF-like signatures observed at D and E with differences (interesting to compare for these two different activations) DATA QUESTION? SST moment is important!? THD THE
20080109 07UT event summary • Modest substorm with multiple activations (AE 400 nT) • Bz reversal (flow reversal?) observed by B and C with time difference motion/evolution of Xline. • Two dipolarizations observed by D-E I. during current sheet thinning at C and B II. associated with X-line at C (and B) Plan: Confirm X-line signatures with particle/field data, compare flow evolution for I. II.
centered high-lat. (Rank) or Greenland(?, tbd) Minor conjunction 0220 UT - AE ~250 nT
Bz reversal around II Two X-line activations rather than in-site Xline observation? THC: PSBLPS I: negative Bz tailward of Xline II: postive Bz earthward of X line THD, THE : dipolarization I: ~220 UT II:~0244 UT Dipolarization I II
For studying reconnection current sheet, determine flow reversal timing is very important DATA QUESTION? Similar to 20080109 event, SST seems to show reversal... How far can we use ESA,SST Moments?Recommendation ? Like 20080109 event THEMIS D and E have also similar issue
Similar to 20080109 eventBBF-like signatures observed at D and E with differences (interesting to compare for these two different activations) DATA QUESTION? SST moment is important!?
20080216 0220UT event summary • Small activation (high-lat.) (AE ~250 nT) • +Bz and –Bz enhancement (or Bz reversal) observed by C associated with two dipolarization event (D, E) and ground-based activation. Different activation of X-line(s?) at different location (first Earthward then tailward side of C) • Plan: Confirm X-line signatures with particle/field data (Timing of flow reversal essential) Compare flow evolution for I. II.
Two small activationscentered high-lat. (Rank) or Greenland(?, tbd) Major conjunction 0430UT AE ~200 nT 0540UT AE ~350 nT
Remote X-line sensing between C and B THB: Tail lobe Bz + - THC: lobe/PSBL Bz - + 1 flux rope, 2 TCR D, E: expansion of plasma sheet
Relationship between earthward motion of flux ropeand innermagnetospheric signatures could be studied THB THD DATA QUESTION? Is this taiward flow OK ? THE The spectra around 0552-55 UT may look dark region at two place? (multi composition ?)
Tailward motion or two of very weak TCR ? THB: lobe Bx - , Bz - THC: lobe Bx + , Bz -
20080210 0430-0550 UT event summary • Two modest activations (200, 350 nT) • Lobe/PSBL signatures may allow to remote-sensing the X-line • Plan: Using transient reconnection model (Semenov et al., 2007) to model location/motion of X line, temporal change of reconnection rate (by Stefan Kiehas) • .. We are still on search of this kind of event...