1 / 10

The Federated Model

The Federated Model. Myth busting. The 4 CCGs have chosen to work together in a federated model The Federation does not exist as a separate body The CCGs remain the statutory bodies responsible for all the functions and duties of CCGs They formally delegate function to federated committees.

damien
Download Presentation

The Federated Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Federated Model

  2. Myth busting • The 4 CCGs have chosen to work together in a federated model • The Federation does not exist as a separate body • The CCGs remain the statutory bodies responsible for all the functions and duties of CCGs • They formally delegate function to federated committees

  3. Why work in a federated model • Help each CCG to fulfil its statutory duties in an economic, efficient and effective way e.g. FOIs, IFRs • Achieve best use of the £25 per head running costs with economies of scale • Maximise influence with large providers such as RBFT and BHCT • Share risk – annual risk sharing arrangement

  4. Access to skills and capacity it would be difficult to access as single CCGs • Achieve consistency and integration where a pan CCG approach is required • Still scope for CCG level initiatives to address local needs

  5. Berkshire West CCGs Governance Structure Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Member Practices Council of Member Practice Council of Member Practice Council of Member Practice Council of Member Practice South Reading CCG North & West Reading CCG Newbury & District CCG Wokingham CCG Delegation to shared Committees Remuneration Committee QIPP and Performance Committee Audit Committee Commissioned Service Quality Committee CCG Commissioning Committee Quarterly PRN Monthly Monthly Joint Commissioning (NB in partnership with UAs) Long Term Conditions Urgent Care Network Planned Care

  6. 2 key strands • Governance • Planning and service redesign

  7. Governance • Audit committee • Remuneration working group • Quality committee • QIPP and finance committee • Commissioning committee

  8. Planning and Service Redesign • Planned Care • Long Term Conditions • Urgent Care • Partnership Board – now developing a mental health and children’s group • Maternity task and finish group - new

  9. Programme Boards • Agree and manage joint programmes of work across all 4 CCGs where all 4 need to be aligned • Contribute to the development of the QIPP – investments and savings • Manage delivery of the QIPP at programme level but each CCG still has statutory duty

  10. Challenges • Programme Boards cause most concern • Make the link between member practices, CCG Boards and programme boards work • Ensure the process doesn’t stifle valid CCG based initiatives • Retain the ability to make rapid decisions across the 4 CCGs.

More Related