1 / 16

Pilot Light

Pilot Light. An incremental plan to transition to a predominantly electronic federal depository. Background. Based on Arizona Pilot Project Only these agencies: B, C, CC, CR, D, HE, HS, I, IA, ID, IC, ITC, SE, SSA, T, TD, TDA, VA, X, XHJ, XJS, Y. Purpose.

damisi
Download Presentation

Pilot Light

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pilot Light An incremental plan to transition to a predominantly electronic federal depository

  2. Background • Based on Arizona Pilot Project • Only these agencies: B, C, CC, CR, D, HE, HS, I, IA, ID, IC, ITC, SE, SSA, T, TD, TDA, VA, X, XHJ, XJS, Y

  3. Purpose • Exert a little more control over our own future • Evaluate duties of staff to ensure that we are taking advantage of all opportunities • To process a large backlog of retrospective materials

  4. Purpose • Increase Public Service • Assess the implications of a “more electronic” fdlp • Share our findings with the Documents Community

  5. University of Arizona Research University Land Grant Selective Selection Rate 59% Team Environment Collection Focus Project summary

  6. Clemson University Research University – but not ARL Land Grant Shared Regional Selection Rate 82% Traditional structure Collection Focus

  7. Organization Chart

  8. Clemson University Research University Land Grant Shared Regional Selection Rate 82% Traditional structure Collection Focus Project Summary

  9. Preparation • Talked with Atifa • Administrative Support from Clemson • Administrative Support from USC • Communicated with GPO • Heads up to Marcive

  10. Preparation • Zero-based collection review • Evaluated documents in the collection • Identified unneeded items • Identified item numbers that have EL but are not listed as such

  11. Impact

  12. Staffing • Evaluated staffing needs • Upgraded 3 LTA positions • Upgraded a Library Specialist • Completely rewrote planning stages

  13. Training • Reviewed all existing written procedures • Automated many procedures • Shared goals of identifying and checking in retrospective documents • Allowed staff to participate in establishing procedures for project

  14. Summary Purpose of the project re-focused • Investigate alternatives to using item numbers as a selection tool • Consult with GPO about print equivalents • Incorporate more tracking of staff implications

  15. Where we are right now • Poised on the edge of “de-selecting” a lot of tangible items • Trying to figure out how to assess • Waiting for the final MOU from GPO

  16. Thank You! Jan Comfort comforj@clemson.edu (864) 656-5168

More Related