1 / 17

A Historical Perspective NGAC created 88 years after the 1 st AC

Learn about the historical roots, advisory committee, and the role of the FGDC in facilitating geospatial activities and implementing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI).

danialk
Download Presentation

A Historical Perspective NGAC created 88 years after the 1 st AC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Historical PerspectiveNGACcreated88 years after the 1st AC J. Milo Robinson Framework & Partnership Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee For NGAC March 24, 2010 www.fgdc.gov

  2. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) • A US Federal interagency committee responsible for facilitating geospatial related activities and implementation of the NSDI across the Federal government • Cooperate and coordinate with organizations from state, local and tribal governments, the academic community, and the private sector • Created by revision to OMB Circular A-16 www.fgdc.gov

  3. National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) The vision of the NSDI: to assure that spatial data from multiple sources (Federal, State, and local governments, academia, and the private sector) are widely available and easily integrated to enhance knowledge and understanding of our physical and cultural world. www.fgdc.gov

  4. Historical Roots of FGDC Source Year Description EO T.R. 1906 Created U. S. Geographic Board. EO 3206 Wilson 1919 Created a new Board of Surveys and Maps that took over the responsibilities of U.S. Geographic Board. EO 9094 FDR 1942 Abolished Board of Surveys and Maps and authorizes Director of OMB to perform the functions of the Board. OMB (BOB) A-16 1953 Describes responsibilities of Federal agencies with regard to the coordination of surveying and mapping activities. www.fgdc.gov

  5. Executive orders • Avoid duplication of work and improve the standardization of maps (1906) • A central information office that was to furnish all map and survey data information within the government as well as from other sources (1919) • Invite the ”map using public” to meetings for ”conference and advice” (1919) www.fgdc.gov

  6. How did the Board of Survey and Maps get Advice? • Created an Advisory Committee • Major focus was the need for • Topographic Map of the U.S. • Held first public conference March 1920 “..great possibilities, if we can do our work in harmony within the organizations and in full cooperation with agencies from the outside.” www.fgdc.gov

  7. by Board Chair to the Advisory Committee “we hope that you will be able to organize in the outside agencies, states, municipalities, technical societies and universities a method by which their work may be correlated. It is not enough that government alone should correlate its activities and establish its own standards, but it is necessary that other organizations public and private engaged in mapping and surveying work come into sufficiently close contact with the government that we may be operating under common standards” www.fgdc.gov

  8. Who was on the Advisory Committee? • American Automobile Association • American Forestry Association • American Institute of Electrical Engineers • Amer. Inst. Of Mining & Metallurgical Eng. • Amer. Railway Eng. Association • Association of State Geologists • Engineering Council • Geologic Society of America • Map Publishers • National Research Council • Society of Automotive Eng. • Later on: American Society of Photogrammetry • Later on: Rand McNally www.fgdc.gov

  9. How was Advisory Committee (AC) Organized? • Chairman • Secretary • Executive Committee • 22 members • AC will disseminate information so that everyone interested can write to the AC • Board would always be glad to receive suggestions from AC www.fgdc.gov

  10. Advisory Committee aligned with Board’s Standing Committees • Coordination • Cooperation • Technical Standards • Topographic Maps • Highway Maps • General Maps • Control • Photographic Surveying • Information www.fgdc.gov

  11. Minutes of Meeting March 1921 …there were not 12 Federal agencies which were making topographic maps … careful investigation had shown that only 5 or 6 Federal agencies were actually engaged… www.fgdc.gov

  12. From the minutes (1921) • The Advisory Council could help in expediting the mapping of the United States, particularly by urging congress to recognize it as a major engineering activity • Congress would pay more attention to non-official presentations then to bureau chiefs www.fgdc.gov

  13. Undated Report circa 1941 “One reason for the creation of the Advisory Council was to serve as a watch dog over the Board and to prevent it going to extremes. The Board is please that ‘disciplinary action’ has not been necessary. Instead it seeks a more active and a larger participation by the Advisory Committee in Board and Committee meetings” www.fgdc.gov

  14. Advisory Committee • Continued participation at Board meetings through 1942 • Generally 2-4 members attend public meeting • Little separate information about the AC • Six EO (1920-1936) amending EO 3206 • 1942 Board & AC abolished and Bureau of Budget (OMB) took over responsibilities (EO 9094) www.fgdc.gov

  15. OMB Rules • Bureau of the Budget, began its program of geospatial coordination in 1940 when it hired Robert Randal, an engineer, to perform this task. • He became responsible for all the mapping production programs of the Federal Government. He held this position until he retired in 1960. • He was the first President of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping and played a vital role in improving geospatial coordination. • OMB Circular A-16, first issued in 1953 and since revised, mostly recent in 2002, remains the leading policy document for geospatial coordination in United States. www.fgdc.gov

  16. Conclusions • Coordination policies have well-established roots • Policy goals are the same as in the past • standards • authoritative information source • broad participation in the coordination process. • Coordination of geographic data is important. • Ways to improve the organizational effectiveness of often stove-piped organizational structures within the Federal Government are needed. • Need to stimulate cross agency coordination and collaboration • History has shown that improving coordination and fostering organizational change that will benefit the development of the NSDI is difficult. If it was easy it would have been done 100 years ago. www.fgdc.gov

  17. Thank You Questions? mrobinson@usgs.gov 703.648.5162 www.fgdc.gov

More Related