1 / 16

All Children Are Equal (ACE) Act Webinar

All Children Are Equal (ACE) Act Webinar. Noelle Ellerson Sasha Pudelski AASA: The School Superintendents Association July 8, 2013. Background. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) is the farthest-reaching federal legislation affecting education.

daniel-gentry
Download Presentation

All Children Are Equal (ACE) Act Webinar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. All Children Are Equal (ACE) ActWebinar Noelle Ellerson Sasha Pudelski AASA: The School Superintendents Association July 8, 2013

  2. Background • The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) is the farthest-reaching federal legislation affecting education. • Title I of ESEA distributes funding to local education agencies (LEAs) to improve achievement of disadvantaged children. • In order to allocate more funding per Title I student to LEAs with higher concentrations of poverty, the current formula weights the count of eligible students in an ELA. • Unfortunately, the current weighting system has the perverse effect of diverting funding away from higher-poverty LEAs, toward lower-poverty LEAs, regardless of the actual poverty rate.

  3. Background • This misallocation stems from the use of two alternative weighting systems: • One based on the percentage of students in poverty (percentage weighting) • One based on the sheer number of students in poverty (number weighting) • Both poverty indicators (number and percentage) are run through their respective weighting scale, and the LEA receives its final Title I allocation based on the system that is of most benefit.

  4. Weighting Brackets Based on Percentage of Students Who Are Title I Eligible

  5. Weighting Brackets Based on Number of Title I Students

  6. The current weighting system has the perverse effect of diverting funding away from higher-poverty LEAs, toward lower-poverty LEAs, regardless of the actual poverty rate. • How? • # weighting gives a big boost in student count to a large LEA even if it has a low % of poverty, while small ELAs, even with high poverty rates, get no benefit from # weighting. • Since Title I distributes funding from a fixed appropriation, all funds gained by an LEA that benefits from number weighting are at the expense of those LEAs that do not.

  7. The current weighting system has the perverse effect of diverting funding away from higher-poverty LEAs, toward lower-poverty LEAs, regardless of the actual poverty rate. • How? • As a result, all small and moderate-sized LEAs with high poverty rates receive far less than they would if all districts were weighted using percentage weighting only. • In fact, some of the highest poverty LEAs are so disadvantaged by number weighting that they receive less than if there were no weighting system at all. • This runs counter to Congressional intent and negates the fact that poverty is poverty and all children should be treated equal under the law.

  8. How Does ACE Address # Weighting? • The ACE Act gradually phases out the number weighting system while leaving percentage weighting in place. • By reducing the weight factors used in the number weighting system over four years, the formula becomes balanced and accurately reflects Congressional intent to allocate funding to LEAs with higher concentrations of poverty. • Large LEAs with high concentrations of poverty would still benefit from percentage weighting, as would all smaller LEAs with higher percentages of poverty.

  9. Source: US Education Department

  10. Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) • Created in NCLB • Dedicated funding stream for small and rural schools and rural and low-income schools • How is rural defined? • Urban-centric locale codes • How is small defined? • Less than 600 students • How is low-income defined? • Census poverty data Note: To find out if you’re CD has REAP eligible districts, ask ED.

  11. REAP Funding • How much do districts receive? • Base grant amount is 20k, max is 60k • Annual appropriation for REAP is $180 million • What do districts use REAP $ for? • Professional development, ed technology, teacher recruitment/retention, school climate improvements, curriculum purchases

  12. HR 5: Student Success Act • Maintains student disaggregation by subgroup • Provides school leaders the flexibility to target dollars where they’re needed most • Eliminates HQT • Returns assessment & accountability to state and local leaders • Eliminates SES/Choice • Returns school improvement interventions for low performing schools to states • Puts states in charge of designing a teacher evaluation system that includes student performance

  13. Questions? Noelle Ellerson nellerson@aasa.org Sasha Pudelski spudelski@aasa.org

More Related